Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
-- Demonstrate? How exactly? Wouldn't there have to be a dispute about the electors? Or what? --

The constitution anticipates that a state or states may fail to send electoral ballots, or send conflicting sets. If THAT dispute results in inability to choose a POTUS, then the Congress picks.

The law likewise allows Congress to dispute a states electoral ballots. This has happened recently, John Kerry moved for this recently. Congress rejected the motion, but it (Congress) can reject a state's slate of electors.

113 posted on 11/05/2020 3:25:16 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt; Iowa Slim

Maybe the Michigan and Wisconsin GOP should formally challenge the vote counts at some point. We have videos of very suspicious activity. My guess is that SCOTUS doesn’t want to get involved. If the House decides each state gets one vote, as you know.


116 posted on 11/05/2020 4:48:34 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson