So....what id PR becomes a state, and gets two senators. This Governor, and two of the last four, are Republicans. Why do we assume that PR’s two senators will be dems?
They do not vote in the election....just the primary.
Adding one more star to the flag will screw up the design.
5 of the last 6 governors of Massachusetts have been republicans.
“So....what id PR becomes a state, and gets two senators. This Governor, and two of the last four, are Republicans. Why do we assume that PRs two senators will be dems?”
It’s the same crowd of pearl-clutchers as always. It’s *always* bad news. Always. They can’t imagine a positive outcome. PR becoming a state in the next few years (assuming Trump is President) could very well cement it as a RED state for the next few decades.
But according to the NNNs here on this site (FR, how you have fallen), the election is *over* and we already lost to a corrupt senile pedophile who campaigned from his basement until two months before the election.
That’s what I was wondering. RATs want to give statehood to PR. Maybe they’re re-thinking that now.