Posted on 09/25/2020 3:22:30 AM PDT by GonzoII
A media campaign has erupted against Amy Coney Barrett, even though President Trump hasn’t actually nominated her to the Supreme Court.
Barrett is clearly the front-runner, having spent a second straight day at the White House as the president moves toward his Saturday announcement. And of course there should be substantial scrutiny of her record if she’s picked, given that replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a lifetime appointment.
But there are early signs this is going to be ugly, and that her religion will be front and center. That subject came up in 2017 when the Senate approved her as a federal appeals court judge in Chicago.
Newsweek jumped on the judge with a smear that turned out to be factually wrong.
Barrett is a devout Catholic, and the magazine described her (as previous profiles have) as a member of People of Praise, “the charismatic Christian parachurch organization, which was founded in South Bend, Indiana in 1971, teaches that men have authority over their wives. Members swear a lifelong oath of loyalty to one another and are expected to donate at least 5 percent of their earnings to the group.”
So she should be disqualified because of her religious affiliation? Isn’t that the essence of anti-Catholic prejudice?
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Its ok to be religious as long as you arent REALLY religious. Thats how American society works.
Allison Jones Rushing!
She is in a warm place now.
Great! By ALL means Donkeys! DO tell us how much you hate Catholics, how you see them as silly, stupid, narrow-minded and unfit for judgeships. Speak right into the cameras.
“Allison Jones Rushing!”
She’s certainly the leading dark horse candidate.
Maybe 70 years ago.
Theyre not going to have a long list of anonymous men claiming she raped them? I thought that was the dem SOP.
Yes, perhaps we can get an evangelical this time?
Well, I don’t know that much about her, but she certainly has all the right enemies.
33 hours to go till the announcement of whomever!
Totally agree with you. Why have hearings when dems will vote NO in the end. They will enjoy persecuting her.
The Satanic cult hates Christians.
Dear President DJT,
If you are reasonably certain you have the votes to pass your selection through to the SCOTUS, spare your selection the Kavanaugh treatment and proceed directly to the vote.
BraveMan
Whoever is nominated, it should go directly two up or down vote. No hearings. Nobody should have to be treated like that.
“So, judge, in your organization, the women are called “handmaidens?”
“Sure, Senator, and and in your group the Masons (or whatever) senior members are called ‘masters’”
Her Catholicism isnt issue, not that she is a mainstream Catholic. She has explicitly stated faith comes before the law as a judge. Thats not what we need on our courts. Thats not a religious test, thats a question of whether she is a textualist or if shell start at her conclusion and work towards it with tortured legal justification based on her personal religious beliefs. A bigger concern is her support for lockdowns and pattern of deference to government and big businesses over individual rights.
I hope she’s ready for the mean-spirited assaults the dems are about to throw at her, and that she remembers them as she serves on the court.
As a Catholic voter I’d have to conclude sadly that most Catholic voters will still vote Dem no matter how badly she is savaged.
They never cease to disappoint me with their blind allegiance to party loyalty over all that is Biblical, decent and just.
Because Grandpa said they is FO DA WORKIN’ MAN. And Uncle Stan marched with Father Coughlin. Or something.
It’s up to Linda to keep the hearings disciplined and cut the Rats off at the knees. Grassley was far too accommodating of Feinstein and her cast of Lawfare actors smearing Kavanaugh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.