Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Durham Probe Looks at Clintons, Raising Questions
Newsmax ^ | Thursday, 24 September 2020 08:32 AM | By Jason Devaney

Posted on 09/24/2020 8:36:58 AM PDT by Hojczyk

John Durham, the Connecticut U.S. attorney who is spearheading an investigation into the origins of the Russia probe, has branched out to look into allegations that the Clinton Foundation broke the law.

The New York Times reported that Durham's team has reached out to law enforcement officials about the Clinton probe and how they conducted the investigation that began in 2015. Among other claims, the organization is alleged to have sought donations in exchange for backing the sale of the Canadian company Uranium One, which had links in the U.S., to the Russian atomic energy agency Rosatom.

No evidence has been discovered that warrants indictments being issued in the matter, despite claims from President Donald Trump and other Republicans that the Clintons — former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton — were corrupt.

Durham's team is investigating how and why, beginning under former President Barack Obama, the Department of Justice kicked off its Russia probe that targeted several people connected to Trump and his campaign.

The request to learn about the Clinton probe is an effort to compare how the two investigations were conducted, according to the Times. But some view it as evidence that the Durham investigation is political in nature and is designed to help Trump — who defeated Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

The Clinton Foundation told the Times, "The Clinton Foundation has regularly been subjected to baseless, politically motivated allegations, and time after time these allegations have been proven false."

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: connecticut; johndurham
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 09/24/2020 8:36:58 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Let me see, 2015 is five years ago. Where have they been since then??


2 posted on 09/24/2020 8:43:11 AM PDT by Mouton (The enemy of the people is the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Will we have his report by, maybe, 2025?


3 posted on 09/24/2020 8:43:41 AM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk


Alexander Downer, from Australia, paid by Chinese, was instrumental in the Coup, and he raised Millions for the Clinton Foundation.


4 posted on 09/24/2020 8:44:12 AM PDT by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
No evidence has been discovered

A bold claim.

5 posted on 09/24/2020 8:44:21 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Arrests soon!


6 posted on 09/24/2020 8:44:25 AM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Democrat investigations sure run slow...


7 posted on 09/24/2020 8:44:33 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Seems like instead of “branching out,” Durham should be finishing up to get indictments as soon as possible. Very, VERY tired of waiting.

Barr said “by the end of summer.” Flash: summer ended Tue, 9/22/20. LETS GO!!


8 posted on 09/24/2020 8:45:54 AM PDT by upchuck (Congressional subpoenas. Congressional hearings. Criminal referrals to the FBI. It's all just Kabuki)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk; All
".... Clinton Foundation broke the law...."

Isn't that some kind of oxymoron?

Or is it one of those "but then I repeat myself" phrases?

Either way, it is a Capt. Obvious statement.

9 posted on 09/24/2020 8:47:26 AM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

If Durham doesn’t have any indictments before the election, we’ll never see any indictments - (as Joe says) PERIOD!!!


10 posted on 09/24/2020 8:48:39 AM PDT by demkicker (My passion for freedom is stronger than that of Democrats whose obsession is to enslave me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

I’ll put my money on one day after the statute of limitations runs out.


11 posted on 09/24/2020 8:49:38 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HotHunt

it is right in their name... clinton foundation... of course all the money went to the clintons.


12 posted on 09/24/2020 8:50:17 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Wasn’t 2015 when Obama started the war on cops in Ferguson???


13 posted on 09/24/2020 8:52:16 AM PDT by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

He’s dragging this out as long as he can. If Biden wins ,the so called investigation will vanish into thin air.


14 posted on 09/24/2020 8:54:14 AM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Durham looks at Clintons.

“Nothing to see here.”

That’s about the size of it.


15 posted on 09/24/2020 8:56:39 AM PDT by Deo volente ("When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God's creation." Pres. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HotHunt

A tautology, I believe.


16 posted on 09/24/2020 8:57:27 AM PDT by gundog ( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

barr, durham, graham, GOP - ALL are useless.


17 posted on 09/24/2020 9:00:52 AM PDT by rockabyebaby (The next four years will be YUGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surrey

Someone more knowledgeable in the legal process explained a while back on an FR thread about how both statute of limitations works (I think it was explained that the clock stops once an investigation begins) and how a different clock on timely due process starts once an indictment is handed down. So timing is important since to make the indictment or arrest, you have a relatively short time to get evidence in order to begin the court process. It remains to be seen if Durham is delaying to sweep things under a rug, or if he is delaying because the enemy has had years to hide or destroy evidence, and making a solid case is important.

It would be helpful if some of the legal experts on FR could comment as my understanding above is not from extensive knowledge or experience with this.


18 posted on 09/24/2020 9:03:50 AM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

*yawn*


19 posted on 09/24/2020 9:08:27 AM PDT by Chauncey Gardiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Hopefully this won’t delay the release his investigation of the O’bummer coup attempt investigation.


20 posted on 09/24/2020 9:08:45 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson