Skip to comments.The Top Contender for RBG’s Seat Has a Fundamentally Cruel Vision of the Law(Barfely funny)
Posted on 09/22/2020 2:34:54 PM PDT by rktman
There is no question that, if confirmed, Barrett would cast the fifth vote to either hollow out Roe v. Wade or overturn it altogether. Similarly, there is no doubt that Barrett would dramatically expand the Second Amendment, invalidating gun control measures around the country. Its quite possible, perhaps even likely, that within a year of her confirmation, Americans will be forbidden from terminating a pregnancy in 21 statesbut permitted to purchase assault weapons and carry firearms in public in every state.
(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...
They want a judge that would use their position for judicial tyranny and activism, just like their sainted ruthie.
A devout catholic and a firm believer of 2nd Amendment Rights. That is just A OK by me!!! Confirm!!!!}
What does Slate claim makes her “cruel”?
Be still my heart.
Screw the anti-Catholic faggots, Amy is the one.
To quote another FReeper, it’s not RGB’s seat. It’s an empty seat on the Supreme Court.
So the top girl is a strict constitutionalist. We need a no crybaby sign.
I am hoping the Court can remove many of the 2nd Amendment INFRINGEMENTS that have been allowed to stand.
There's more: Protect innocent life and drive a stake in the heart of the ORWELLIAN named "Affordable Care Act."
If Roe v Wade was good law the Dems wouldnt be so worried about it. It would go back to the states. If you want legal abortion then move to a state that allows it.
Hey, I was already a supporter of Amy — Mark Joseph Stern can stop trying to sell me on her. I’m sold!!
its not RBG seat, she didn’t own it, it is a VACANCY left on the court.
It’s a short article filled with the author’s opinion of what would be considered as cruel. Take a minute and read it if you’re interested.
I cannot think of anything more CRUEL that the slaughter of the unborn. This is monsterously cruel.
The left wants to DEFUND and DISBAND police, while at the same time DISARMING the law abiding. This is INSANELY CRUEL.
I can’t think of a better endorsement for President Trump’s pick than Slate writing this article.
You can bank this: no state is going to outright ban abortion. Some will limit it to 1st tri or detection of a heartbeat but a total ban nope
Slate wants you to think all these things are bad. But I read their prediction and thought “OK, I can go with that.”
The Senate will just have to have the vote based upon what they know, because there IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR HER TO ENDURE ANOTHER SET OF SENATE HEARINGS!!!!!!
Watch this video of Amy Coney Barrett explaining her judicial philosophy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.