Posted on 08/13/2020 9:45:42 AM PDT by Kaslin
On August 18, 1920, with the ratification of the 19th Amendment, all U.S. females of age became enfranchised and by decree, for the first time, enjoyed the rights and responsibilities of citizenship. Who could have foreseen that such rights are now in peril for both women and men?
The women's suffrage movement in the U.S. represented both a moral and legal decades-long struggle to secure the right to vote and to hold public office. As we approach the 100th anniversary of this momentous occasion, it is ironic that our one-person, one-vote rule of law is in deep jeopardy, and that female politicians such as Nancy Pelosi, Kamala Harris, and others in prominent positions are doing all that they can to thwart the voting process.
Voter Fraud is Rampant
Recent reports of fraud and manipulation have already surfaced in California, Nevada, West Virginia, and New Jersey. Despite the bogus claims from legions of media outlets and research centers (who all know better) that voter fraud in America is a minor issue, through investigative efforts and, as a case in point, two Washington Post reporters determined it is likely that 17,800 non-U.S. citizens, just in North Carolina alone, voted in the 2008 elections.
The buried Washington Post feature also cited that 1 in 16 non-citizens in the U.S. voted in the 2008 election. Nationally, illegal immigrants now total 15.7 million people, so upwards of nearly 1,000,000 illegal votes might have been cast.
Barack Obama carried North Carolina in 2008 by a mere 14,177 votes. With more than 80 percent of these 17,800 individuals voting Democratic – when they had no right to vote at all – one quickly sees that John McCain's electoral votes from North Carolina may have been stolen.
In Wake County alone, the NC Voter Integrity Project identified 532 non-citizens who were registered to vote. How were these people revealed? Jay DeLancy, the founder of the Voter Integrity Project, said, “Actually, they revealed themselves.” When called to serve on jury duty, over a three-year period, 532 people disqualified themselves by demonstrating to an officer of the court that they were not U.S. citizens.
Only 18 of the 532 obeyed the law by obtaining a “legal presence” on the path to citizenship. Then, over time, seven of the 532, or 1.3 percent, eventually became U.S. citizens. Now, add in millions of deceased voters on the rolls nationally, double voters, mail-in vote malarky, and late ‘found’ votes, and you have the formula for utter chaos.
The Implications are Staggering
If a single illegal vote is cast for one party, that vote neutralizes a legitimate vote cast for the other party and effectively shreds the one-person, one-vote rule.
When voter fraud and vote tampering incidences are uncovered and publicized, some people, primarily on the Left, are quick to say that such fraud represents ‘isolated incidents.’ Their reflexive response, always, is to downplay any indication that voter fraud occurs en mass across America, all the time. Let's consider, however, the implications of The Washington Post findings.
From a three-year snapshot, in a single county, at least 532 people are registered to vote who should not be. Considering that North Carolina has 100 counties, and recognizing that the 532 people who jumped jury duty likely represent a tiny subset of all illegal voters, the situation reveals a likely staggering contortion of democracy in all 50 states.
Suppose we were to undertake a study in 49 other states to determine who voluntarily attempted to jump jury duty and then, in a like manner as described above, determine how many people were illegal voters. The answer would be unfathomable.
Such findings, however, would not make the front page or, perhaps, even the back page of The New York Times, or The Washington Post, or your own city paper. The Post slipped this feature discussed above onto their website, late on a Friday; an opportune time to ensure that a distracted public will not see it. Why hide it? Continuing evidence of voter fraud does not serve the agenda of left-leaning media moguls.
A Not so Hidden Agenda
Media and political pundits who claim voter fraud to be a minor issue don’t wish to reveal that they are at odds with the effective functioning of our democracy. Why aren't more people aware of outright voter fraud? Major media outlets bury any findings by staff reporters or via their own surveys which don't support their agenda.
What could that agenda be? The most obvious answer is to steal elections, to contort democracy, and to ensure that their side wins by any means necessary. After all, they know best, so get out of their way.
Is there something you can do about voter fraud? Absolutely. When citizens, on both the left and right, and even in the middle, volunteer to be observers at every precinct, the incidence of voter fraud declines. The national election is within a few months. That gives you plenty of time to contact your county board of elections and let them know that you are willing to volunteer.
You can be an observer, be involved in the final count for your precinct, or possibly be involved in safeguarding the transportation of any paper ballots. When the opportunity for fraud is diminished, democracy benefits.
We really need to revert back to the original definition of natural-born citizen, with sanguinity (both parents US citizens at time of birth, if not conception), and location (born on US soil). Current law allows people like Harris (possible duel loyalty to Jamaica or India), Cruz (possible duel loyalty to Canada or Cuba) and Obozo (possible duel loyalty to Kenya or UK) to shoot for the moon.
As a companion agenda, we really also need to reverse the SCOTUS ruling that allowed for duel citizenship.
Well, it is important to look at the results of giving women the right to vote. And the results speak for themselves. It was a very bad idea. Women office holders? Fine. Women voters? Bad idea.
Oink! Isaiah 3:12.
(Look at the grooming gangs in England, at Malmo, at Germany.)
Regarding the failing voting power of ordinary, qualified citizen voters, the real problem is, ironically, the ill-conceived 17th Amendment (17A) in conjunction with the corrupt, constitutionally undefined political parties imo.
Excerpted from 17th Amendment: "The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof [emphasis added], for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures."
The biggest consequence of state lawmakers ratifying that amendment, foolishly giving up their voices in Congress by doing so, is out-of-control federal interference in the affairs of the sovereign states, especially unconstitutional federal taxes which are arguably stolen state revenues.
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
In fact, patriots can bet that if a given federal domestic social spending program isn’t reasonably related to the US Mail Service, the program in unconstitutional and be right probably most of the time.
"Article I, Section 8, Clause 7: To establish Post Offices and post Roads;"
And when the sleepy states finally wake up and repeal 17A, they can make the 16th Amendment disappear too.
"16th Amendment: The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."
Send "Orange Man Bad" federal and state government desperate Democrats and RINOs home in November!
Supporting PDJT with a new patriot Congress and state government leaders that will promise to fully support his already excellent work for MAGA and stopping SARS-CoV-2 will effectively give fast-working Trump a "third term" in office imo.
"The “Holy Grail” of organized crime is to party with Uncle Sam's "unlimited credit card.”" —me
"The power to tax involves the power to destroy, [...]” —Chief Justice John Marshall, McCulloch v. Maryland, 1819.
"The 16th Amendment effectively repealed the involuntary servitude aspect of the 13th Amendment imo, evidenced by unconstitutional federal taxes." —me
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"13th Amendment, Section 1:
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude [emphasis added], except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."
"16th Amendment:
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."
"It’s politically correct, under the Democratic Party and its tyrant judges, to use your voting power to make your fellow citizens involuntary servants." —me
"The Democratic elite define a "pro-choice" democracy as being able to vote for your preferred master." —me
"The ill-conceived 17th Amendment not only effectively politically repealed the 3/4 state supermajority requirement of the Constitution’s Article V for ratification of proposed amendments to the Constitution imo, politically correct interpretations of the Constitution now prevailing under Democratic judicial tyranny, but also consider this. That amendment also effectively nullified Congress’s constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers along with the Supreme Court’s clarification of Congress’s limited power to appropriate taxes." —me
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"The constitutionally undefined political parties are basically rival, corrupt voter unions, “union dues” paid by means of unconstitutional federal taxes. Belonging to a political party means that you are a subject, not a member.” —me
"Patriots need to support PDJT in demanding that Congress moves "April 15" tax day to the day before election day." —me
"The smart crooks long ago figured out that getting themselves elected to federal office to make unconstitutional tax laws to fill their pockets is a much easier way to make a living than robbing banks." —me
"Federal career lawmakers probably laugh all the way to the bank to deposit bribes for putting loopholes for the rich and corporations in tax appropriations laws, Congress actually not having the express constitutional authority to make most appropriations laws where domestic policy is concerned. Such laws are based on stolen state powers and uniquely associated stolen state revenues." —me
i remember the 2008 election of the muzzie...that’s all i heard from every woman i know and voted for that punk...”and he loves her so much!!!”....yea, real smart reason to vote for someone. Now with kamala, they just love when she dances...and they just love her laugh...oh brother, dark days ahead...
The 19th is the root cause of almost every problem we have today.
“I know there are some Freepers around that claim that women should not be allowed to vote. I refer to them as chauvinistic pigs,”
I wager there’s a great many more than you imagine, but staying quiet just like Trump supporters.
Not chauvinistic pigs, but men with an honest and rational view (versus emotional and misandrist) of the overall effect of 19A on America today, after100 years — Illegitimacy, drugging our boys, abortion as birth control, leftism, lost & unhappy & drunkard women, faggotry glamorized, Godless schools, easy divorce, broken homes, rampant misandry and much more, enabled largely by womens’ emo votes.
This situation parallels calling blacks racists. Are they? If I say they are, will you hammer me for speaking THAT unwelcome (by them) truth?
Women are wonderful people but generally speaking they make horrible leaders - they are too controlled by emotions rather than rationality. It’s in their nature
If they make bad leaders they will also choose bad leaders.
The Margaret Thatchers are the rare exception. That’s not to say that men always make better leaders, far from it, but it’s just that the probabilities are better due to the nature of the beasts. It’s a numbers game.
I'm no longer convinced this is the worst outcome. For all of its faults, at least Islam is a patriarchy where men are allowed to be men and not pussified soy boys. There's no "Me Too" in Islam. No trannies in the locker rooms in Muslim countries.
Hell, hand the place over to the Muslims and I may convert myself, out of spite. Won't the libs be surprised when a bunch of white guys change their names to Achmed and stop putting up with their bullshit! "You weren't supposed to do that!"
“I’m fine with women not being allowed to vote as long as we don’t have to pay any taxes...”
OK if, conversely, those that pay no net taxes cannot vote. That’s most pf those taking entitlements (welfare, food stamps, college kids, etc.), Romney’s 47%.
most are just way too simplistic in their critical thinking...
Yep. Europe lost so many men in WWI and then WWII. And what happened afterward over there? Where are they now, socially?
“most are just way too simplistic in their critical thinking...”
I consider our original, millennia old programming:
Men to procreate, hunt, build shelter, protect.
Women to procreate, raise children til teenagers, run the shelter, socialize.
Mens’ nature is technical, making tools and buildings.
Women’s’ nature is emotional, primarily dealing with emotional, illogical beings called children.
We ignore our core natures at society’s peril (imho).
I agree the Dems have nothing to offer women as well, but I can see why some women might THINK they do.
But why any man would vote for a Dem is truly mystifying to me. The fact that they are so screwed in family court alone should be enough to convince them.
And wealthy, white men? Those who vote for Dems are simply self-loathing.
“I am sure there are some males that should not be allowed to vote”
No question, but in a “democracy” the game is a numbers game. And more women are ruled by emotions than men, and when women vote and get elected to office you end up with a more touchy-feely and short-term thinking society...which is what we have today.
Sign me up.
Bookmark
I think that both men and women landowners should be able to vote.
One vote per acre. Those who live in cities would have their votes divided to equal one vote per acre.
I think only veterans with honorable discourages should be allowed to vote for President
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.