Skip to comments.After 100 Years of Women Voting, All Votes Are in Peril
Posted on 08/13/2020 9:45:42 AM PDT by Kaslin
On August 18, 1920, with the ratification of the 19th Amendment, all U.S. females of age became enfranchised and by decree, for the first time, enjoyed the rights and responsibilities of citizenship. Who could have foreseen that such rights are now in peril for both women and men?
The women's suffrage movement in the U.S. represented both a moral and legal decades-long struggle to secure the right to vote and to hold public office. As we approach the 100th anniversary of this momentous occasion, it is ironic that our one-person, one-vote rule of law is in deep jeopardy, and that female politicians such as Nancy Pelosi, Kamala Harris, and others in prominent positions are doing all that they can to thwart the voting process.
Voter Fraud is Rampant
Recent reports of fraud and manipulation have already surfaced in California, Nevada, West Virginia, and New Jersey. Despite the bogus claims from legions of media outlets and research centers (who all know better) that voter fraud in America is a minor issue, through investigative efforts and, as a case in point, two Washington Post reporters determined it is likely that 17,800 non-U.S. citizens, just in North Carolina alone, voted in the 2008 elections.
The buried Washington Post feature also cited that 1 in 16 non-citizens in the U.S. voted in the 2008 election. Nationally, illegal immigrants now total 15.7 million people, so upwards of nearly 1,000,000 illegal votes might have been cast.
Barack Obama carried North Carolina in 2008 by a mere 14,177 votes. With more than 80 percent of these 17,800 individuals voting Democratic – when they had no right to vote at all – one quickly sees that John McCain's electoral votes from North Carolina may have been stolen.
In Wake County alone, the NC Voter Integrity Project identified 532 non-citizens who were registered to vote. How were these people revealed? Jay DeLancy, the founder of the Voter Integrity Project, said, “Actually, they revealed themselves.” When called to serve on jury duty, over a three-year period, 532 people disqualified themselves by demonstrating to an officer of the court that they were not U.S. citizens.
Only 18 of the 532 obeyed the law by obtaining a “legal presence” on the path to citizenship. Then, over time, seven of the 532, or 1.3 percent, eventually became U.S. citizens. Now, add in millions of deceased voters on the rolls nationally, double voters, mail-in vote malarky, and late ‘found’ votes, and you have the formula for utter chaos.
The Implications are Staggering
If a single illegal vote is cast for one party, that vote neutralizes a legitimate vote cast for the other party and effectively shreds the one-person, one-vote rule.
When voter fraud and vote tampering incidences are uncovered and publicized, some people, primarily on the Left, are quick to say that such fraud represents ‘isolated incidents.’ Their reflexive response, always, is to downplay any indication that voter fraud occurs en mass across America, all the time. Let's consider, however, the implications of The Washington Post findings.
From a three-year snapshot, in a single county, at least 532 people are registered to vote who should not be. Considering that North Carolina has 100 counties, and recognizing that the 532 people who jumped jury duty likely represent a tiny subset of all illegal voters, the situation reveals a likely staggering contortion of democracy in all 50 states.
Suppose we were to undertake a study in 49 other states to determine who voluntarily attempted to jump jury duty and then, in a like manner as described above, determine how many people were illegal voters. The answer would be unfathomable.
Such findings, however, would not make the front page or, perhaps, even the back page of The New York Times, or The Washington Post, or your own city paper. The Post slipped this feature discussed above onto their website, late on a Friday; an opportune time to ensure that a distracted public will not see it. Why hide it? Continuing evidence of voter fraud does not serve the agenda of left-leaning media moguls.
A Not so Hidden Agenda
Media and political pundits who claim voter fraud to be a minor issue don’t wish to reveal that they are at odds with the effective functioning of our democracy. Why aren't more people aware of outright voter fraud? Major media outlets bury any findings by staff reporters or via their own surveys which don't support their agenda.
What could that agenda be? The most obvious answer is to steal elections, to contort democracy, and to ensure that their side wins by any means necessary. After all, they know best, so get out of their way.
Is there something you can do about voter fraud? Absolutely. When citizens, on both the left and right, and even in the middle, volunteer to be observers at every precinct, the incidence of voter fraud declines. The national election is within a few months. That gives you plenty of time to contact your county board of elections and let them know that you are willing to volunteer.
You can be an observer, be involved in the final count for your precinct, or possibly be involved in safeguarding the transportation of any paper ballots. When the opportunity for fraud is diminished, democracy benefits.
That would be me. Oink oink.
I’m a woman and I’d give up my right to vote if all other women gave up their right to vote too.
But since that’s not happening, men, you must vote in numbers greater or equal to women. Right now women vote more than women. So each of you go tell one non-voting friend to do so.
For the life of me I can’t see why any man would vote Dem. I have 3 brothers and 3 sons and a husband and there is nothing the Dem party offers men. Nothing.
there’s a reason they weren’t allowed to vote until 1920...that’s all im gonna say..
there’s a reason they weren’t allowed to vote until 1920...that’s all im gonna say..
In the aftermath of the Harris Administration, the liklihood that male suffrage will be ended, or curtailed is more than just a possibility. Perhaps males can still vote, but only by mail and only when the ballot is signed by a female. Wait for it. The real Handmaiden Tale.
My wife has TDS very badly.
She thinks Don is going to take her voting rights away.
I’m fine with women not being allowed to vote as long as we don’t have to pay any taxes...men should be the only ones required to pay taxes...all of them...
Single women are NOT a good group to build civilization on; civilization must be built on the FAMILY. Single women are as a whole risk-averse, even cowardly. They tend to view government as a surrogate husband who protects them and provides for their needs. This leads to fatherless families, which demonstrably increase violence. Civilization is not advanced by a matriarchy.
The 19th Amendment was one of the worst mistakes of the American Experiment. A better solution would have been to allow married women a separate vote, but disallow single women from voting.
I don't even know why we discuss the issue. Unless we hand over the country to Muslim clerics, there is no roadmap to ever taking away a women's right to vote.
If you are a married woman, I have no problem with you voting. It’s single women I think should not vote, because their avoidance of marriage and family is anti-civilization.
Yes married women at least tend to vote a bit more GOP, unless they are in CA.
I know what you meant to write, but as written, it sounds like the DEM way. :smirk:
Once the country splits (and it will), a LOT of things will be on the table that weren’t before.
Its too late to stop women voting but no question allowing them to do so liberalized the nation
More than any single factor
True in all of western civilization
Its not married womens fault as much
Its single women.
I know—sorry! I mean to type women vote more than men right now.
Maybe now that there are no sports and we can’t vacation much, men will get off their butts and go vote this year.
I'll pay income taxes, and property taxes, but women must still pay sales taxes nevertheless 'cause they buy too much sh*t as it is.
Primary schoolers should be allowed to vote....that would include Biden. If they can choose their gender...
Not only that, there is no roadmap for a marxist / communist take-over of the USA either.
“I refer to them as chauvinistic pigs”
Oink. It isn’t that women as a rule shouldn’t be allowed to vote, and they never were really completely banned from voting. It is that so many vote liberal because they don’t have skin in life. They have spouses and welfare that cover them. It used to be land owners, not transitory renters, that had rights to vote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.