Posted on 08/01/2020 7:36:24 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The myth has become legend. Some an assclown wearing a shirt yesterday with “GUILTY because the color of my skin!” SMDH! Act like an asshat, get treated like an asshat. Act respectfully and get treated respectfully. I know that’s a stretch to figure out for some folks but.........................
A fervent movement based upon a lie? Read the history of Joseph Smith.
Got my lizard; where's my hat?
So all that Brown stuff was a set up for bringing up the sufferings of perverts?
Poofters: must everything be made about them?
Just like the myths about saint Skittles.
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
Or as Dan Rather would say, Fake, but accurate. It was made up, we know it was made up, but it’s still truthful. You can’t make the whole thing go away by saying it didn’t happen as we know it didn’t happen. Hands up, don’t shoot, say his name, Michael Brown...
Reality is that he stole from a store, then marched his big man butt down the middle of the street, attacked the officer who contacted him, and got shot. But it’s about police brutality.
Saint Brown’s actual actions, what actually happened, to the liberal mind, it doesn’t matter. In their faith, he transcended from being a neighborhood thug who finally punched the wrong man to someone who was shot while innocently holding his hands on high.
Who says we don’t have a state religion...
Police Brutality....... Negro Defense Lawyer falderal, legal disgrace, American travesty.
The problem is not Cops, the problem is molly coddled black criminals that reject America and live by continuously breaking the law. Presently, it is a black societal disgrace to be apprehended and an absolute right to resist arrest and flee.
Injuring cops in the process and totally disregarding the cops civil right to a safe workplace is points on positive in ordinary black society be it criminal or non criminal. The black right to transgress the law in every possible manner is the first item on being black. There is no law.
There was a negro president of the united States who promoted the black law less ness in the name of equality. If blacks were truly equal, there would not be enough taxpayer money to buy the prison facilities to house them.
Any one who claims these statements are racist has forfeited his right to be American. He has surrendered to the black criminal class
Michael Brown's thuggish brain
burned with rage and disdain,
but the last thing passing through his racist head
... was Darren Wilson's hot service lead.
The lesson here is plain,
be good, play nice, reach old age,
be bad, be thuggish, you soon be dead.
LOL
When emotion is involved there is no room for logic and reason.
TWENTY FIVE TOP QUOTES FROM THE DOJ’S REPORT ON THE MICHAEL BROWN SHOOTING
(For official DOJ report, Google “DOJ Report on Shooting of Michael Brown PDF.”)
[01] The evidence, when viewed as a whole, does not support the conclusion that Wilsons uses of deadly force were objectively unreasonable under the Supreme Courts definition. (Page 5)
[02] when the store clerk tried to stop Brown, Brown used his physical size to stand over him and forcefully shove him away. (Page 6)
[03] Wilson was aware of the theft and had a description of the suspects as he encountered Brown and Witness 101. (Page 6)
[04] Autopsy results and bullet trajectory, skin from Browns palm on the outside of the SUV door as well as Browns DNA on the inside of the drivers door corroborate Wilsons account that during the struggle, Brown used his right hand to grab and attempt to control Wilsons gun. (Page 6)
[05] there is no credible evidence to disprove Wilsons account of what occurred inside the SUV. (Page 7)
[06] autopsy results confirm that Wilson did not shoot Brown in the back as he was running away because there were no entrance wounds to Browns back. (Page 7)
[07] witnesses who originally stated Brown had his hands up in surrender recanted their original accounts (Page 8)
[08] several witnesses stated that Brown appeared to pose a physical threat to Wilson as he moved toward Wilson. (Page 8)
[09] The physical evidence also establishes that Brown moved forward toward Wilson after he turned around to face him. The physical evidence is corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses. (Page 10)
[10] evidence does not establish that it was unreasonable for Wilson to perceive Brown as a threat while Brown was punching and grabbing him in the SUV and attempting to take his gun. (Page 11)
[11] Wilsons account is corroborated by physical evidence and that his perception of a threat posed by Brown is corroborated by other eyewitnesses (Page 12)
[12] Wilsons account was consistent with those results, and consistent with the accounts of other independent eyewitnesses, whose accounts were also consistent with the physical evidence. Wilsons statements were consistent with each other in all material ways, and would not be subject to effective impeachment for inconsistencies or deviation from the physical evidence.8 Therefore, in analyzing all of the evidence, federal prosecutors found Wilsons account to be credible. (Page 16)
[13] Witness accounts suggesting that Brown was standing still with his hands raised in an unambiguous signal of surrender when Wilson shot Brown are inconsistent with the physical evidence, are otherwise not credible because of internal inconsistencies, or are not credible because of inconsistencies with other credible evidence. (Page 78)
[14] Multiple credible witnesses corroborate virtually every material aspect of Wilsons account and are consistent with the physical evidence. (Page 78)
[15] several of these witnesses stated that they would have felt threatened by Brown and would have responded in the same way Wilson did. (Page 82)
[16] there are no witnesses who could testify credibly that Wilson shot Brown while Brown was clearly attempting to surrender. (Page 83)
[17] There is no witness who has stated that Brown had his hands up in surrender whose statement is otherwise consistent with the physical evidence. (Page 83)
[18] The media has widely reported that there is witness testimony that Brown said dont shoot as he held his hands above his head. In fact, our investigation did not reveal any eyewitness who stated that Brown said dont shoot. (Page 83)
[19] Wilson did not know that Brown was not armed at the time he shot him, and had reason to suspect that he might be when Brown reached into the waistband of his pants as he advanced toward Wilson. (Page 84)
[20] Wilson did not have time to determine whether Brown had a gun and was not required to risk being shot himself in order to make a more definitive assessment.
[21] In addition, even assuming that Wilson definitively knew that Brown was not armed, Wilson was aware that Brown had already assaulted him once and attempted to gain control of his gun. (Page 85)
[22] Wilson has a strong argument that he was justified in firing his weapon at Brown as he continued to advance toward him and refuse commands to stop, and the law does not require Wilson to wait until Brown was close enough to physically assault Wilson. (Page 85)
[23] we must avoid substituting our personal notions of proper police procedure for the instantaneous decision of the officer at the scene. We must never allow the theoretical, sanitized world of our imagination to replace the dangerous and complex world that policemen face every day. (Page 85)
[24] It may appear, in the calm aftermath, that an officer could have taken a different course, but we do not hold the police to such a demanding standard. (citing Gardner v. Buerger, 82 F.3d 248, 251 (8th Cir. 1996) (same))). Rather, where, as here, an officer points his gun at a suspect to halt his advance, that suspect should be on notice that escalation of the situation would result in the use of the firearm. Estate of Morgan at 498. An officer is permitted to continue firing until the threat is neutralized. See Plumhoff v. Rickard, 134 S.Ct. 2012, 2022 (2014) (Officers need not stop shooting until the threat has ended). For all of the reasons stated, Wilsons conduct in shooting Brown as he advanced on Wilson, and until he fell to the ground, was not objectively unreasonable and thus not a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242. (Page 85)
[25] Given that Wilsons account is corroborated by physical evidence and that his perception of a threat posed by Brown is corroborated by other eyewitnesses, to include aspects of the testimony of Witness 101, there is no credible evidence that Wilson willfully shot Brown as he was attempting to surrender or was otherwise not posing a threat. (Page 86)
For the reasons set forth above, this matter lacks prosecutive merit and should be closed.
Is this a call to THE FLYING INMANS?
Maybe the Dancing Itos.
A call to the Flying Inmans!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.