Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I asked a question the other day wondering where all the Product Liability and Tort lawyers were on these claims being made regarding masks which offer ZERO protection against what they are selling.

Now I would like to know WHERE IN THE HELL ARE OUR US ATTORNEYS regar5ding Enforcing LONGSTANDING Federal Law regarding Medical Devices??

Governor Howdy Doody here in California should have already been arrested along with his sister Mayor Wonder Boy Garcetti.

And what about these cities that say they will cite you for REFUSING TO VIOLATE FEDERAL LAW?? Shouldn't they all be Criminally Prosecuted also??

WHERE ARE THE US ATTORNEYS and TORT LAWYERS???

1 posted on 07/03/2020 5:57:25 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: eyeamok

Wow, those are great points all!

I also fail to see how mandating a particular item of clothing falls within the powers of government at any level. It’s an invasion of privacy; you’re being forced to wear an item of clothing, basically to express adherence to the government.


2 posted on 07/03/2020 6:01:28 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

I like this argument.

Thanks for posting.


3 posted on 07/03/2020 6:03:31 AM PDT by Balata (Structure determines Function)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

bttt


4 posted on 07/03/2020 6:05:22 AM PDT by Pajamajan ( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Don't wait. Do it today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

While these are excellent point, it will fall on deaf ears of the covid-19 Karens.


6 posted on 07/03/2020 6:06:04 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

FACT: It is illegal in the United States to sell, offer for sale or promote via any means that touches interstate commerce (which would include any communications form that crosses a state line) any drug or device intended to treat, prevent or cure any disease or disorder of the human body without proof in the form of random clinical trials which are then submitted and analyzed by the FDA.

This is controlled under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (Title 21 USC.) The government goes after sellers of supplements and devices on this basis all the time. The law is crystal clear in this regard; both safety and efficacy must be scientifically proved, reviewed and then formally approved by the FDA

The Covid virus was supposed to be contained in the kind of lab where people wear astronaut suits and go through triple sealed doors. It is a con of massive proportion to assert that now, having escaped those environs, a bandana will magically do the trick.

After all, size matters.*

The pore size of cloth face coverings range from ~ 20-100 microns. The Covid virus is 200-1000x smaller than that, at 0.1 microns. Putting up a chain link fence will not keep out a mosquito. Even the most esteemed medical journals admit their purpose is to calm anxiety. “Expanded masking protocols’ greatest contribution may be to reduce the transmission of anxiety …”

*Simone Gold, MD, JD, FABEM, is a board certified emergency physician. She graduated from Chicago Medical School before attending Stanford University Law School to earn her Juris Doctorate degree. She completed her residency in Emergency Medicine at Stony Brook University Hospital in New York. Dr. Gold worked in Washington D.C. for the Surgeon General, as well as for the Chairman of the Labor & Human Resources Committee.

She works as an emergency physician on the frontlines whether or not there is a pandemic. Her clinical work serves all Americans: from urban-inner city, to suburban, to the IHS. Her legal work has focused on conflicts between hospitals and insurers. She writes on a number of policy issues relating to law and medicine. She always leads with the facts. Read more at The Gold Opinion.

A company that makes ear loop masks, tells its users, their mask will not protect users from
Corona 19 Viruses:

https://media.thedonald.win/thedonald/post/XGdfOknn.jpeg

Doesn’t it depend on how much actual protection from spread the mask provides? It seems to be commonly accepted that masks don’t protect you from getting it, at least that’s what the mask boxes say.

If that’s true, then how can the mask protect you from spreading it, in the slight chance that you happen to be covid positive but pre-symptomatic that day?

How can the mask prevent spread from exhalation but not from inhalation?

https://commonsenseevaluation.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/A-Mask.png

https://media.thedonald.win/thedonald/post/tY3fDNw6.png


7 posted on 07/03/2020 6:08:13 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ( Preserve the American way of life! All lives Matter, not Only BLACK CRIMINAL LIVES MATTER!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

People like me cannot wear one due to asthma. i tired at the beginning and had an attack and then was rushed to hospital. The doctor told me I should not wear one.
So how the hell can the government tell a business that those who are allowed to enter have to wear a mask and those who do not are not allowed which is in violation of the ADA of which asthma falls under and is protected?


8 posted on 07/03/2020 6:23:29 AM PDT by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

Interesting. I just saw a blurb on Fox last night that the wealthy folks on Palm Beach down here (that’s the island on the ocean side of West Palm where Trump, Rush and other affluent live), are suing about mask wearing stating it’s a medical device that hasn’t been proven effective and could be harmful. Seems like the la-de-da have had enough!


12 posted on 07/03/2020 6:31:22 AM PDT by time4good
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data


13 posted on 07/03/2020 6:35:44 AM PDT by Basket_of_Deplorables (This is all a communist plan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

btt


15 posted on 07/03/2020 6:38:45 AM PDT by GailA (I'm a Trump Girl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

If you are not sick, they can not use the color of law to force you to do any of this stuff. They would be violating 18 USC 242. They must ask nicely like the President does. Notice, he has not mandated or sent out storm troopers to enforce any of this. He asked nicely to flatten the curve and then provided massive government medical and financial help.


18 posted on 07/03/2020 6:40:02 AM PDT by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok
Transmission of COVID-19 virus by droplets and aerosols: A critical review on the unresolved dichotomy

Per the above, standard facemasks prevent spread by droplets, but not areosols. For more, see Section 5 from the above.

19 posted on 07/03/2020 6:44:59 AM PDT by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

We are being forced to wear a medical device with the claim that it protects against virus transmission, when all documented evidence based on several studies shows that wearing a mask inhibits proper oxygen intake, which may lead to severe health problems. On the other hand there is no documented evidence, nor have any studies been conducted that would back up the claim that wearing a mask offers any protection against the transmission of viruses.


21 posted on 07/03/2020 6:49:20 AM PDT by semaj (We are the People!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

I hate those laws as it is. No reason for our federal government to have monopoly censorship control over medical speech.

But the sorry fact is the loophole the globalists have found is the health emergency powers held by the states, counties and municipalities now being abused beyond recognition with the support of the Deep State/MSM oligopoly.

It’s going to take massive uprisings and foot putting down on the part of the citizenry to get that reined in and then put back in its proper role again.


27 posted on 07/03/2020 7:00:46 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

All true.

But...but...it will do nothing to stop the despotism.

There are dozens of ways that local and state governments can harass and destroy businesses that are difficult or impossible to stop.

These various governments are telling businesses that they must not allow customers in without masks....or else.

You can’t force a business to allow you in if it demands a mask. Some of these fascists have figured this out and are using this approach. You can’t conduct your entire life online.

Only mass civil disobedience will stop this. Based of the number of sheep wearing masks, that just isn’t going to happen. The despots have already won, even when (more like if) lockdowns and mask orders end. The people are now conditioned.

Flu season will be here right on schedule and you can make book on them starting this mask crap up all over again. I double damn guarantee that.


33 posted on 07/03/2020 8:08:50 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

My Nexcare 8612F respirator is rated N95. It states on the box: “The U.S. FDA has cleared this respirator (model 8612F) for use by the general public i public health emergencies, such as an influenza epidemic, to help reduce wearer exposures to airborne germs. This is not intended for any other use.”

Further, it warns: “This respirator is intended to help reduce breathing in pathogenic biological airborne particles or germs during public health emergencies, such as an influenza pandemic.”

Seems to me that, at the least, the N95 is lawful. Bandanas, cloth masks and the like are not.


34 posted on 07/03/2020 8:30:48 AM PDT by NTHockey (My rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

Bkmk


35 posted on 07/03/2020 8:31:21 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

Apparently you are not aware that there are two sets of laws. One for them and another for us peons.


37 posted on 07/03/2020 8:53:08 AM PDT by saintgermaine (THE TIME TRAVELLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

If the COVID virus is 30 nm in diameter, then what protection is actually afforded by an N-95 type mask that protects down to 100 nm?

Inquiring minds want to know.


38 posted on 07/03/2020 9:13:44 AM PDT by LastDayz (A blunt and brazen Texan. I will not be assimilated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

Bkmrk.


42 posted on 07/03/2020 9:32:55 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...siameserescue.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

Yeah take that argument to the courts and see where it gets you.


51 posted on 07/04/2020 3:42:57 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson