Posted on 06/30/2020 7:40:09 AM PDT by JOHN ADAMS
Held: The application of the no-aid provision discriminated against reli-gious schools and the families whose children attend or hope to attendthem in violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the Federal Constitution. Pp. 6–22.
(Excerpt) Read more at supremecourt.gov ...
The potential problem is many nations fund sectarian schools. This has been the lever to force these schools to teach things that go against their values.
Finally, one case that blackmailed Roberts was allowed to vote on the correct way.
Why doesn’t this guy just resign - his decision-making since the Obamacare decision has been pretty UN- Iriginalist, and it is obvious that something happened. Perhaps an emissary from Trump can, after the election, visit with Roberts and let him know that it is highly unethical for a blackmailed judge to rule on cases, with appropriate evidence, and give him a week or two to resign.
Two words: Stopped clock.
He is a sellout. Any case before the court which will evoke liberal riots if his deciding vote is cast against them, he will always vote with the leftist bloc without fail.
If Kennedy was against Obergefell, there’s no doubt in my mind he’d have flipped his vote, just like he did with saving Husseincare.
Somehow you think he ISN'T???!?
John Roberts sides with liberals on Supreme Court to block controversial Louisiana abortion law
Supreme Court Rules Against Trump in DACA Case (Roberts strikes again!)
There are many more leftist decisions by Roberts, listed here:
7 Times John Roberts Was A Leftist Hack
Go ahead, attempt to justify your mockery.
I'll wait.
does this mean that federal money could go to islamic schools?
Of course, there is a perfectly logical explanation. They could care less about children and their education. They send their own children to private schools, not public schools. What they care about is the teachers' unions. They can't and will not offend them.
Of course the “liberals” won’t go along. More people who understand their rights flow from their creator and not from government fiat, are a threat to everything they desire.
Of course, there is a perfectly logical explanation. They could care less about children and their education. They send their own children to private schools, not public schools. What they care about is the teachers' unions. They can't and will not offend them.
It’s also a back door for government control of private schools, want government money can’t teach homosexuality is a sin. Can’t fire gay teachers.. can’t fire a transvestite etc etc.
You bet. Be careful what you wish for. Want that gov money then you’ll have to play by anti-religious gov rules.
The four Liberals on the Court believe the statement “separation of Church and State” is written in our Constitution.
The same four Liberals on the Court think the statement “shall not be infringed” is not written in our Constitution.
That is our last best hope Court for you.
Did you read any of those rulings? Trump lost on DACA because he didn’t simply issue an EO overturning it, but let his people d*** around with interpretations of regulations - and do it without the legally mamdated public notice. The ruling was correct; the administration earned the loss.
MONTANA
Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue
(argued January 22, 2020): Challenge to a decision by the Montana Supreme Court invalidating a tax-credit program because the scholarships created by the program could be used at religious schools. Roberts and Justice Stephen Breyer have not yet written opinions for January; because the January argument session only had eight arguments, one of them will not write an opinion
this is the case
Once those vouchers go to Religious schools, they become, for all intents and purposes, Government Schools.
Next thing you know the supreme legislators will rule that religious institutions must do as they dictate.
Roberts may be a loose cannon, but you ALWAYS know how the 4 libtards will vote in lock step. Don’t know how they sleep at night.
When one has had one’s conscience seared, one can sleep very soundly. One’s problem begin when one has to Stand before Almighty God.
Yes it does. That’s why I am now against vouchers. We have a couple of private islamic schools in my state and they are treated like any other private school. I don’t want my tax money going to teach islam to kids. If that means it doesn’t go to catholic or protestant private schools, then too bad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.