Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump order to ban chokeholds unless officer's life in danger
The Hill ^ | 06 15 2020 | Morgan Chalfant

Posted on 06/16/2020 10:27:48 AM PDT by yesthatjallen

President Trump on Tuesday signed an executive order on police reform amid a broad national debate sparked by the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, which has itself led to heightened calls to address racial justice issues in the United States.

Trump held a Rose Garden event to sign the order, the text of which has yet to be released by the White House.

“What is needed now is not more stoking of fear and division. We need to bring law enforcement and communities closer together, not to drive them apart,” Trump said.

The executive order would use federal funding to incentivize police departments to improve training on the use of force and de-escalation techniques, administration officials said in a briefing ahead of the president's remarks. They said it also aims to strengthen information sharing so the federal government can better track officers who have excessive use of force complaints.

Trump offered few details on the legislation, though he said that chokeholds will be banned except for situations where an officer’s life is at risk. It is not clear who would make that judgement. Administration officials have said local leaders will largely shoulder the responsibility of getting law enforcement to comply.

The president said additional funding will be allocated to help police departments deal with homelessness, substance abuse and mental illness.

“We must build upon our heritage, not tear it down, and we must cherish the principles of America’s founding as we strive to deliver safe, beautiful and elegant justice and liberty for all,” Trump said shortly before signing the order.

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chokeholds; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: yesthatjallen

While he was at it he shoild have banned indian rope burns, camel bites and knuggies too. throw in the figure 4 leg lock the scorpion suplex and the “claw”.. and no more “SURF BOARDS” EITHER!!


21 posted on 06/16/2020 10:38:10 AM PDT by Ikeon (They see me roll'n and they be hate'n. they think Im talkin dirty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

To say that something is being done to reform the police forces.


22 posted on 06/16/2020 10:38:15 AM PDT by Morpheus2009 (If you want me to be afraid, then be consistent in your logic, standards, and your lies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: al baby

“I thought kneeling was a good thing ?”

Whether it’s good or bad, why are we changing the subject from kneeling on someone’s back, to chokeholds?

Is Trump ok with kneeling on the neck? So he’s changing the subject to chokeholds? I don’t get it. And the media doesn’t seem to be curious either (but that’s not new).


23 posted on 06/16/2020 10:39:16 AM PDT by rintintin (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I think what’s happening is a financial incentive. The holds are banned if you want that money. That’s how I got it. I can’t blame Trump now as the media won’t deal in nuisance. Get him re-elected before he can keep going 1 v establishment. It’s clear Trump’s instincts are 180 than this.


24 posted on 06/16/2020 10:39:37 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim W N

Financial conditions, not regulation per se.


25 posted on 06/16/2020 10:40:10 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Well, if an officer's life is in danger (or civilian bystanders') then a choke hold shouldn't be used - lethal force should be immediately employed to end the threat.

This is one of the few times I disagree with our (current) President. A choke hold is a valid non-lethal option. Yes, it is not without risks if applied "over zealously" - heck even under nominal circumstances & use there's always a chance other conditions may combine/impact the result ah "unfavorably."

Banning these and other techniques just means confrontations are going to drag out longer. It will embolden suspects/criminals to resist more and longer. If a LEO is putting a suspect into a choke hold they are obviously well past the point of discussing the suspect's behavior over tea.

26 posted on 06/16/2020 10:40:11 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It would appear to only cover police departments using federal funding and to federal law enforcement.


27 posted on 06/16/2020 10:40:39 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

“To say that something is being done to reform the police forces.”

Right, but why isn’t he addressing the maneuver that was actually used on George Floyd? Are knees to the neck OK?


28 posted on 06/16/2020 10:41:03 AM PDT by rintintin (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Our nation’s original notions of dispersed power, local, self-government, and limited centralized powers have been steadily eroded, starting mainly in the Progressive era.

Really all that’s left of significance is local policing, and management of elections. That’s why the Left are constantly seeking “reform” of both.


29 posted on 06/16/2020 10:46:17 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Are they going to specifically define what a chokehold is, because most people don’t know?


30 posted on 06/16/2020 10:46:35 AM PDT by Moonman62 (http://www.freerepublic.com/~moonman62/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Not really. All it is, is if you want our money do what we ASK. Don’t want our money, then you won’t get ANY.


31 posted on 06/16/2020 10:48:11 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Where is the banning of Antifa Executive Order?


32 posted on 06/16/2020 10:48:20 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Mocking Liberals is not only a right, but the duty of all Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It sounds like it is not so much an “order” as a string attached to the federal funding incentive. So you change your police department use-of-force guidelines to disallow choke holds, or you’re not getting your slice of the pork pie.


33 posted on 06/16/2020 10:49:40 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Dumb. Sounds like another stupid idea coming from his daughter and son in law.


34 posted on 06/16/2020 10:50:56 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isnÂ’t common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Really? In your world, the chokehold was the only non-lethal option?


35 posted on 06/16/2020 10:51:01 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

Bingo!


36 posted on 06/16/2020 10:51:24 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isnÂ’t common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jim W N

“No constitutional authority for the feds to regulate local police.”

Nobody is forcing the local police to accept federal funding, or the rules that come with it.


37 posted on 06/16/2020 10:52:25 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

Yeah!
Where is it?
President Trump is flailing around in the wind right now.


38 posted on 06/16/2020 10:53:09 AM PDT by right way right (May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our only true hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

now the rioting will stop in 3...2.. ????


39 posted on 06/16/2020 10:53:16 AM PDT by proust (Justice delayed is injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

“Are knees to the neck OK?”

Well, BLM is always telling us to “take a knee”.


40 posted on 06/16/2020 10:53:45 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson