Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump order to ban chokeholds unless officer's life in danger
The Hill ^ | 06 15 2020 | Morgan Chalfant

Posted on 06/16/2020 10:27:48 AM PDT by yesthatjallen

President Trump on Tuesday signed an executive order on police reform amid a broad national debate sparked by the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, which has itself led to heightened calls to address racial justice issues in the United States.

Trump held a Rose Garden event to sign the order, the text of which has yet to be released by the White House.

“What is needed now is not more stoking of fear and division. We need to bring law enforcement and communities closer together, not to drive them apart,” Trump said.

The executive order would use federal funding to incentivize police departments to improve training on the use of force and de-escalation techniques, administration officials said in a briefing ahead of the president's remarks. They said it also aims to strengthen information sharing so the federal government can better track officers who have excessive use of force complaints.

Trump offered few details on the legislation, though he said that chokeholds will be banned except for situations where an officer’s life is at risk. It is not clear who would make that judgement. Administration officials have said local leaders will largely shoulder the responsibility of getting law enforcement to comply.

The president said additional funding will be allocated to help police departments deal with homelessness, substance abuse and mental illness.

“We must build upon our heritage, not tear it down, and we must cherish the principles of America’s founding as we strive to deliver safe, beautiful and elegant justice and liberty for all,” Trump said shortly before signing the order.

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chokeholds; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

1 posted on 06/16/2020 10:27:48 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

How is that any business of any President to make such an “order”?


2 posted on 06/16/2020 10:29:06 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

So, take away a non lethal technique and leave only the lethal ones...?


3 posted on 06/16/2020 10:30:31 AM PDT by 2banana (Common ground with islamic terrorists-they want to die for allah and we want to arrange the meeting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Laws have become “whatever”.

The Supreme Court legislates from the bench.
Governors order churches to shut down.
Mayors take away the right to assemble.
No one really has the right to free speech anymore.

It’s free-for-all, not a republic.


4 posted on 06/16/2020 10:31:17 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Wonderful. No more chokeholds.

But what difference does that make now in light of the fact George Floyd DID NOT DIE OF A CHOKEHOLD??


5 posted on 06/16/2020 10:32:03 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (Click my screen name for an analysis on how HIllary wins next November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
How is that any business of any President to make such an “order”?

Election year.

6 posted on 06/16/2020 10:32:09 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Sounds like Javanka idea .


7 posted on 06/16/2020 10:32:19 AM PDT by ncalburt (Gop DC Globalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Help me out here.

It wasn’t a chokehold that was used against George Floyd in that video, was it?

It was a knee on his back or his neck, wasn’t it?

Why are we switching the conversation to chokeholds?


8 posted on 06/16/2020 10:32:22 AM PDT by rintintin (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

An overstep of Presidential authority, Mr. President.


9 posted on 06/16/2020 10:33:03 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
How is that any business of any President to make such an “order”?

I love President Trump, and he is a great president, but he is not exactly going to get bound up with the details of federalism. It comes with the package.
10 posted on 06/16/2020 10:33:53 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Exactly.

I hate to say it, but this is little more than a Bible waiving march to St. John’s.


11 posted on 06/16/2020 10:35:18 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (Click my screen name for an analysis on how HIllary wins next November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

No choke hold? Then bring back the slapjack.
Leather strap with a few ounces of lead sewn in one end. It will get their mind right.


12 posted on 06/16/2020 10:35:38 AM PDT by 9422WMR (democRATS are destroying the country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Was a chokehold used against George Floyd?

I thought it was a knee on his neck or back, apparently depriving him of air.

Why are we talking about chokeholds all of a sudden?


13 posted on 06/16/2020 10:35:50 AM PDT by rintintin (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

No constitutional authority for the feds to regulate local police.

I love Trump, but to MAGA we MUST not only stop ongoing unconstitutional and, thus, illegal, federal acts, but DISMANTLE the pre-existing 80%+ unconstitutional portion of the feds.

MAGA by restoring our Free Constitutional Republic.


14 posted on 06/16/2020 10:36:48 AM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
The Police should have those little devices the Aliens used on the TV Show The Invaders.

They press it on the back of your neck and you die from a Cerebral Hemorrhage.

Still can't figure how David Vincent survived through two Seasons.

15 posted on 06/16/2020 10:36:55 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Kill a Commie for your Mommy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

I thought kneeling was a good thing ?


16 posted on 06/16/2020 10:37:39 AM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom Hi Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

George Floyd DID NOT DIE OF A CHOKEHOLD??

My question exactly. The video showed a KNEE ON HIS NECK OR HIS BACK

Why isn’t Trump talking about that maneuver? Where did the issue of chokehold come from?


17 posted on 06/16/2020 10:37:41 AM PDT by rintintin (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

> How is that any business of any President to make such an “order”? <

Excellent question. It’s just another example of turning the states into provinces of the federal government. Because I’m betting it will be one of those “If you receive federal funds, you must obey this order.”

Bad policy no matter who is president.


18 posted on 06/16/2020 10:37:44 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

If state and local LEO’s receive federal monies, I suppose the President can dictate terms.

Otherwise, this only should pertain to federal law enforcement.


19 posted on 06/16/2020 10:37:44 AM PDT by Bratch (If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Good stuff!


20 posted on 06/16/2020 10:37:49 AM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson