Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The US Air Force is removing height restrictions for pilots, which will allow more women to serve
CNN ^ | May 25, 2020 | Harmeet Kaur

Posted on 05/25/2020 10:56:38 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement

(CNN) — The US Air Force has removed its minimum height requirements for prospective pilots, doing away with a barrier that had disadvantaged women.

Previously, aspiring Air Force pilots were required to have a standing height of 5'4" to 6'5" and a sitting height of 34 to 40 inches. Applicants shorter than 5'4" or taller than 6'5" had to submit a waiver.

Though most height waivers were approved, the restrictions eliminated about 44% of the US female population ages 20 to 29, according to the Air Force.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: height; military; usairforce; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Grognard49

I am in the air force NOW and we have an epidemic of pornographic bimbos trying to get attention. They have no interest in the technicalities just being around guys, preferably superior officers they seek to blackmail with complaints of sexual harassment if they do not get their way

These whomen do not envy, they do not know good, nor evil, nor pretty nor ugly, they are nothing who want it all handed to them, they have no passion because they are full of drama and passion themselves.


41 posted on 05/25/2020 12:05:28 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security in hatse:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

LOL! Agreed. Hope you’re having a great day, FRiend.


42 posted on 05/25/2020 12:07:04 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to says it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: stanne

With every real flying women, you have hundreds of bimbos who have no interest in flying and only do it because it makes them look cool like the real flying woman. They just go there for the guys. They have zero interest in the technical work and some secretely hate it like the kid who became a pilotinstesd of a poet sbecause daddy told him to


43 posted on 05/25/2020 12:09:09 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security in hatse:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

My GF’s son went into the AF. He’s got bad eyes and is 6’8”. Decided on being a mechanic.


44 posted on 05/25/2020 12:10:51 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

No. I’m talking about back when it was not a mob recreational activity to pummel people with a brain

Hub was not exactly a feminist. I did use the term ‘express’. One knows. Wives know.


45 posted on 05/25/2020 12:12:27 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

Yep. We have a Dead Poet society military. These feminine kids who belong to pausing in paintings like Obama or the Mona Lisa who want to join the airforce for the cool looks of it, not for the action. They start crying when discipline is imposed or sueing for sexual harassment when they do not make the mark


46 posted on 05/25/2020 12:13:30 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security in hatse:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Oh I’m not talking about insane practices. I’m talking about when women started flying within the military in the early eighties.


47 posted on 05/25/2020 12:14:15 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll

I don’t doubt it.

But I’m just talking about pilots. The subject of the thread.


48 posted on 05/25/2020 12:15:25 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

This is STUPID.

For the Navy - there is a ‘Manual of Anthropomorphic Measurements’ for each ‘platform’ (plane). It specifies what are acceptable for each platform. Sitting height - minimum and maximum. Arm Reach - minimum and maximum. Back of seat to end of knees (don’t want knees clipped if ejecting). Weight - min/max (an ejection seat might not work properly for someone too heavy - and it might compress the spine and harm someone too light.

It is VERY expensive to design a plane that has more ‘flexible ranges’ - to try to allow someone say 4’11’ up to 6’6”. So - you design a plane within certain constraints- and you limit the crew to fit within those constraints. PERIOD.

A few years ago - one of my son’s USNA friends wanted to fly F-18 jets - but was too tall - so he went to P-3’s and P-8s. A young lady I worked with in Civil Air Patrol weighed too little to fly F-18s - so she decided to go to West Point and work to fly combat helicopters...(more flexible range of values for pilots/co-pilots).


49 posted on 05/25/2020 12:19:07 PM PDT by Vineyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyclops08

Phone books.


50 posted on 05/25/2020 12:30:20 PM PDT by DeplorableGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Beat me to it!


51 posted on 05/25/2020 12:30:51 PM PDT by DeplorableGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

For resisting G-forces, wouldn’t short/stout be better than tall/thin?


52 posted on 05/25/2020 12:32:35 PM PDT by Sooth2222 ("The natives are growing restless")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Saburo Sakai said that in the prewar Japanese Navy, they had an extreme standard for pilots vision. Part of their training and selection was to be able to find certain bright stars during daylight hours. Then to look away and see if you can find it again. He felt like their policy was so strict that the IJN Passed on hundreds of pilots they should have accepted.


53 posted on 05/25/2020 12:34:26 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
...which will allow more women to serve

Yeah, they can serve me a sandwich.

54 posted on 05/25/2020 12:38:02 PM PDT by real saxophonist (If you don't have a gun, sell some toilet paper, and go buy a gun. - Colion Noir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne

Well, I don’t even think they should be on golf courses, or in locker rooms after sports events.


55 posted on 05/25/2020 12:41:00 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

I don’t think women should be in men’s locker rooms nor doing commentary. I’m a girl so ...


56 posted on 05/25/2020 12:45:35 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
3 You Must Be This Tall to Ride CLOWN Vinyl Decals for Car Truck ...
57 posted on 05/25/2020 12:52:04 PM PDT by Ben Dover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

“Nothing good will come of this. Not a damn thing.”

You got that right!


58 posted on 05/25/2020 1:10:59 PM PDT by Taxman (MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, AGAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

I just looked it up: 20 - 40 correctable is the requirement. Did not specify whether pilot or NFO.

Was 20 - 20 when I entered USN pilot training in 1964.

Obviously, some things have changed - probably not for the better!


59 posted on 05/25/2020 1:14:28 PM PDT by Taxman (MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, AGAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: stanne

They HAD to lower the standards!

Otherwise, not enough girls would have made it into or through the pipeline!


60 posted on 05/25/2020 1:18:56 PM PDT by Taxman (MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, AGAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson