Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clapper: 'Routine' to ask to 'unmask' unknown individuals in intelligence reports
The Hill ^ | 05 14 2020 | Tal Axelrod

Posted on 05/14/2020 10:36:50 AM PDT by yesthatjallen

Former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper said Thursday it is “routine” to “unmask” American citizens who have been caught up in surveillance of foreign individuals as Republicans spark an uproar over allegations that officials spied on former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

“Over the six and a half almost seven years when I served as DNI I would say perhaps once or twice a week perhaps,” Clapper said on CNN when asked how frequently he would request an American’s identity to be revealed.

“It’s a routine thing. It’s appropriate and legitimate when you have a valid foreign intelligence target engaging with a U.S. person. Is it, for example, an insider, someone in the government engaging with a foreign adversary? So it’s important from the standpoint of potential jeopardy to national security that you understand what’s going on.”

Clapper was one of several Obama-era officials named on Wednesday by the Trump administration and Republican senators who they say asked for documents that led to Flynn being “unmasked” from intelligence reports between the 2016 election and President Trump’s inauguration.

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abuseofpower; civilrights; clapper; dni; domesticespionage; flynn; spying; unmasking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 05/14/2020 10:36:50 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

His mouth will be his undoing. We are just a couple of toe nails and fingers away from the truth.


2 posted on 05/14/2020 10:39:23 AM PDT by samadams2000 (Get your houses in order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

hmmm....maybe Grinnell should publish ALL of his unmasking requests.


3 posted on 05/14/2020 10:39:37 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I’d say I am stunned but, more numb these days...


4 posted on 05/14/2020 10:39:38 AM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Ah... Mufti James bin Clapper, C_A Jihadist.


5 posted on 05/14/2020 10:39:39 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

My question is why were so many unmasking Flynn.


6 posted on 05/14/2020 10:39:59 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

What he or any of the others say now is irrelevant. What matters is the evidence sealed away awaiting trial


7 posted on 05/14/2020 10:40:45 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I wish holding government employees accountable “happened all the time”.


8 posted on 05/14/2020 10:41:22 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (#openupstateny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

It’s routine, they now say, to spy on an incoming national security adviser during a “lame duck” administration. They are isolating the “unmasking” term and will ride that horse with their media co-conspirators.


9 posted on 05/14/2020 10:41:23 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

sounds like we had a bunch of paranoics running things.. all working for the best interests of the chilrun’ of course.. and protecting their own cabal of malcontents.


10 posted on 05/14/2020 10:42:25 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Including Ambassadors


11 posted on 05/14/2020 10:43:15 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (Open up America! Enough! COMMUNISM was and IS the problem Boycott China)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
"Lyin' Jim" Clapper weighs in.

He would never lie to you.

12 posted on 05/14/2020 10:44:02 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer's p*ssboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

As head of DNI, Flynn only needed it once in his whole career.

Shows the difference between a patriot and a criminal.


13 posted on 05/14/2020 10:45:54 AM PDT by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

It is so “routine” that there are special procedures to follow when asking for an unmask.


14 posted on 05/14/2020 10:47:16 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator

What a dumb ass..

I would love to see Adm Mike Rogers question Clapper about his “routine” unmaskings.


15 posted on 05/14/2020 10:47:45 AM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO

(derived from COunter INTELligence PROgram) (1956–1971) was a series of covert and illegal[1][2] projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting American political organizations.

...The FBI has used covert operations against domestic political groups since its inception; however, covert operations under the official COINTELPRO label took place between 1956 and 1971.[12] COINTELPRO tactics are still used to this day and have been alleged to include discrediting targets through psychological warfare; smearing individuals and groups using forged documents and by planting false reports in the media; harassment; wrongful imprisonment; and illegal violence, including assassination.[13][14][15][16] The FBI’s stated motivation was “protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order”.[17]

...Illegal surveillance
The final report of the Church Committee concluded:

Too many people have been spied upon by too many Government agencies and too much information has been illegally collected. The Government has often undertaken the secret surveillance of citizens on the basis of their political beliefs, even when those beliefs posed no threat of violence or illegal acts on behalf of a hostile foreign power. The Government, operating primarily through secret and biased informants, but also using other intrusive techniques such as wiretaps, microphone “bugs”, surreptitious mail opening, and break-ins, has swept in vast amounts of information about the personal lives, views, and associations of American citizens. Investigations of groups deemed potentially dangerous—and even of groups suspected of associating with potentially dangerous organizations—have continued for decades, despite the fact that those groups did not engage in unlawful activity.

Groups and individuals have been assaulted, repressed, harassed and disrupted because of their political views, social beliefs and their lifestyles. Investigations have been based upon vague standards whose breadth made excessive collection inevitable. Unsavory, harmful and vicious tactics have been employed—including anonymous attempts to break up marriages, disrupt meetings, ostracize persons from their professions, and provoke target groups into rivalries that might result in deaths. Intelligence agencies have served the political and personal objectives of presidents and other high officials. While the agencies often committed excesses in response to pressure from high officials in the Executive branch and Congress, they also occasionally initiated improper activities and then concealed them from officials whom they had a duty to inform.

Governmental officials—including those whose principal duty is to enforce the law—have violated or ignored the law over long periods of time and have advocated and defended their right to break the law.

The Constitutional system of checks and balances has not adequately controlled intelligence activities. Until recently the Executive branch has neither delineated the scope of permissible activities nor established procedures for supervising intelligence agencies. Congress has failed to exercise sufficient oversight, seldom questioning the use to which its appropriations were being put. Most domestic intelligence issues have not reached the courts, and in those cases when they have reached the courts, the judiciary has been reluctant to grapple with them.[92][93]


16 posted on 05/14/2020 10:47:48 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Joe Biden- "First thing I'd do is repeal those Trump tax cuts." (May 4th, 2019))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Yeah, sure.

39 times and the unmasked one just happens to be the next National Security Adviser for the opposition party.

Happens every day!

Dope. Keep peddling!


17 posted on 05/14/2020 10:48:27 AM PDT by dan on the right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Col Frank Slade

It’s like asking Hillary Clinton why she illegally had a dozen FBI files and she says, What? I have 900 files.

Just another day


18 posted on 05/14/2020 10:49:06 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Joe Biden- "First thing I'd do is repeal those Trump tax cuts." (May 4th, 2019))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

It’s truly amazing how the crap of the crop wind up in government.


19 posted on 05/14/2020 10:49:07 AM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dan on the right

2 weeks before leaving office Sloe Pervy Joe needed to see.

WHY? What was he going to do with the intel?


20 posted on 05/14/2020 10:50:00 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Joe Biden- "First thing I'd do is repeal those Trump tax cuts." (May 4th, 2019))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson