The expectation of privacy only applies when you want to snuff out your baby...
Sounds like criminal trespassing - the stores don’t want him in there. Except for Target, of course.
...it’s not a crime in Tennessee to film fully clothed women without their consent if they’re in public.
However, “how” you film may be a problem. e.g. stalking or “up the skirt”, etc. But yeah. It sorta hast to be legal or all photography where people are around could come under legal scrutiny. You couldn’t even take a picture of your family without worrying about who or what is in the background. And just one slip up could cost you. And things like Google Glass or the equivalent will eventually be so common people won’t even think about it.
Pedo Joe is pleased.
Correct legal decision. But I love how the story emphasizes that the judges were all MEN!!!! Oh, those evil men who uphold the law and the Constitution. BTW, someone should have just kicked this guy in the nuts a few times. That would end the problem.
I would not be surprised to find out that the creep has a map with x’s on it to mark the burial places of his victims. He bears watching, IMO.
It sounds like he’s a perv who is trying to get up as close to the legal line as possible.
Which, in that way, I concur with the judges. If I read this right, he simply took photos from a long distance at the butts, breasts, and crotches. This is different than upskirt or other forms of voyeurism where a woman is reasonably certain others will not see their private areas. By filming then in public, he’s not technically violating anything.
It’s little different than a man staring a woman’s breasts in public. It’s rude and creepy but it’s not something the law need be involved in. He could very well take full body photos with a high quality DSLR and zoom in the favored body parts.
If we made a law against what he did, that’s something he’d probably move to. What then? Ban photographs in public.
I think the line is set fairly reasonably.
The judge is Biden’s cousin.
I have no words. How’d he survive without getting his ass kicked? Nobody gets that close to me, unless I am married to him.
Cell phones lenses are so small they are wide angle cameras, so to ‘zero in’ and anything they have to be on top of it.
I realize his behavior was annoying to the women, but taking pictures of ‘their private parts’ when they are dressed sounds silly.
Husband/boyfriend of said woman who’s being photographed; can that camera take pictures in the dark?
This is the logical result of the consequences of the legal term "reasonable expectation of privacy.
Why is anyone surprised by this?
Then they deserved it!
out in cali a judge ruled that photographers can take photos through people’s windows on their homes- said it wasn’t against the law- don’t know if that’s been overturned or not- hopefully it has-
He wasn’t upskirting them with a shoe cam was he?
Govt has to rule this way, they are the biggest filmers of anyone in public.
Did somebody tell creepy joe?
This is a chinese hacker who goes by the name of "Sexycyborg" this is how she hacks systems
"With my shadowless shoes I distract the target with my…upper body and they don’t see the real danger on my feet, " she wrote.
Within her high heel lurks a variety of hacking devices including a USB keylogger, which can be plugged into a computer and record every letter type by its user - allowing her to harvest passwords or other sensitive information.
The stiletto also hides a pen testing device which can be plugged into a network, allowing her to remotely access it.
Someone who knows how to use her assets and isn't afraid to uses them.
Well, what will the population of women in that state look like in a few years? Imagine that, and recoil.