Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barr Orders U.S. Attorneys to Look for Civil Liberties Violations, ‘Take Action to Correct Them’ if Needed
lawandcrime.com ^ | 5:21 pm, April 27th, 2020 | by Jerry Lambe

Posted on 04/27/2020 11:55:25 PM PDT by Syncro

U.S. Attorney General William Barr on Monday released a memo to federal prosecutors which sought to balance public safety measures with the preservation of “constitutional rights and civil liberties” during the coronavirus pandemic. The memo instructs U.S. Attorneys to “be on the lookout” for orders by state and local governments which encroach upon the rights of citizens.

Barr said he is expanding the mandate on prosecutors previously directed to prioritize cases against persons accused of illegally profiting from PPE hoarding and price gouging to also encompass constitutional violations.

“Now, I am directing each of our United States Attorneys to also be on the lookout for state and local directives that could be violating the constitutional rights and civil liberties of individual citizens,” Barr wrote.

Per the memo:

“As the Department of Justice explained recently in guidance to states and localities taking steps to battle the pandemic, even in times of emergency, when reasonable and temporary restrictions are placed on rights, the First Amendment and federal statutory law prohibit discrimination against religious institutions and religious believers. The legal restrictions on state and local authority are not limited to discrimination against religious institutions and religious believers.”

Barr said he is authorizing the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Eric Dreiband and the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan Matthew Schneider to coordinate DOJ’s “efforts to monitor state and local policies and, if necessary, take action to correct them.”

Barr also provided an example of the conduct the DOJ should be ensuring does not take place.

Read the rest at Law and Crime


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agbarr; barr; constitution; doj; eeyoreparty; ericholderswallows; overreaching
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: krogers58
"Any US attorney who has a law degree should be able to sail an injunction through a federal court."

Agreed, particularly with the burden of proof on the state to defend "essential" vs. "non-essential" business.

A co-ordinated effort could open most red states with GOP governors & AGs rapidly -- FL, OH, IN, etc., the right federal suit could open all businesses without this phased-in garbage but merely subject to the distancing guidelines.

Would also like to see this tested in states with Donkey governors and Republican AGs, like that hillbilly Brassiere.

21 posted on 04/28/2020 1:39:38 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (I don't owe you my freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: guitar Josh
It's nice to have an AG who actually defends our rights

I like Barr, but so far he has only talked about defending our rights.

24 posted on 04/28/2020 2:02:47 AM PDT by KevinB ("Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." - Charles Darwin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

It will scare some into re-opening, just to cover their butts.

Even if they don’t actually get prosecuted personally, it might make them look bad during the election - which could be enough to influence behavior.


25 posted on 04/28/2020 2:07:31 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krogers58

Too little, too late.
States are easing restrictions now, starting with those restrictions thta bump up against “the enumerated rights” found in the constitution.
18USC242.


26 posted on 04/28/2020 2:28:33 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Scatology is serendipitous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

I don’t know if Barr has been sleeping or what but there already have been many violations. Freedom of assembly and freedom to worship to name a few. Wake up!


27 posted on 04/28/2020 2:37:17 AM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

That includes every American who belongs to a church, Mr. Attorney General.


28 posted on 04/28/2020 2:52:23 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Amen to that, and ESPECIALLY Christians.

It’s a 1st amendment thing.


29 posted on 04/28/2020 3:01:43 AM PDT by Syncro (Facts is Facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: HighSierra5

Really

Maybe when we see things of this nature, we need to send the violations to the Fed Attorneys for the particular area.

I think he is calling on us to wake up our governors etc with a call or notice of some kind to let them know what their BOSS wants!


30 posted on 04/28/2020 3:06:09 AM PDT by Syncro (Facts is Facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Not here in California, at least some areas.

The SF Bay area has extended house arrest for another month, closed down until end of May.


31 posted on 04/28/2020 3:08:46 AM PDT by Syncro (Facts is Facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: All

They are talking about this on FOX AND FRIENDS right now.


32 posted on 04/28/2020 3:09:32 AM PDT by Syncro (Facts is Facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver; krogers58

I was very surprised by this letter, coming so soon after a promise to join litigation with amicus briefs. As so many of the restrictions are demonstrably arbitrary and the harm to potential plaintiffs so very great and often irreparable, we are likely to see some action here.

To those on this board who suggest long and drawn out investigations, that is not what this is about. Rather it is stopping a behavior from continuing. How long did it take the Left to get injunctions against PDJT policies? That was often hours. If there are good cases here, this can pay off quickly.


33 posted on 04/28/2020 3:16:47 AM PDT by jimfree (My19 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

The thing that gives me hope is that Barr actually did take action against that Mississippi mayor who banned drive-in church.


34 posted on 04/28/2020 3:43:51 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
“Now, I am directing each of our United States Attorneys to also be on the lookout for state and local directives that could be violating the constitutional rights and civil liberties of individual citizens,” Barr wrote.

"be on the lookout"?

"could be violating"?

Uhhhhh…..open your eyes Bagpipes. And where have you and your Dept of Injustice bureaucrats been while states and city mayors have run roughshod over the Constitution for over a month?

And thanks for nothing, once again.

I expect Barr to be as effective in this endeavor as he was in concluding that Epstein committed "suicide."

'Nothing' to indicate Epstein death was not a suicide: Attorney General William Barr

35 posted on 04/28/2020 3:49:02 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
The thing that gives me hope is that Barr actually did take action against that Mississippi mayor who banned drive-in church.

All it takes is a few demonstrations of injunctive relief to have mayors and governors looking over their shoulders.

36 posted on 04/28/2020 4:20:45 AM PDT by jimfree (My19 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jimfree
mayors and governors looking over their shoulders.

Most of them should be looking over their shoulders, after all, there are plenty of "experts" out there.

37 posted on 04/28/2020 4:46:55 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (We need to reach across the aisle, extend a hand...And slap the crap out of them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: VideoDoctor

he beats the living hell out of Eric Holder and Janet Reno.


38 posted on 04/28/2020 4:56:55 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Syncro; impimp; bagster

18USC242

Are you staying under “house arrest”?
Have you changed your normal routine out of fear of being arrested/fined/jailed?

Do you fear the laws more than the minute chance of catching the virus, the smaller chance of becoming symptomatic and the nearly impossible risk of being hospitalized?

If you go about your normal business are you afraid of being arrested? You should know that you have “Constitutionally enumerated rights” (e.g., rights due solely to your existence/birth) that come into play. There is no “spin of law” or executive emergency order that can deny your those rights. Travelling about freely and peaceably cannot be considered “public nuisance” or “disturbance” without some legalistic sophistry (color of law).

This includes the 1st Amendment right to “petition the government for redress of grievances”. You may say, “Huh?” but I say, if you suspect you are being deprived of any “Constitutionally enumerated rights”, call the FBI and report a federal felony in progress; AKA, petitition the government for redress of grievances”. I have the regional FBI saved in my phone.

It looks like Barr WANTS you to exercise that right.

What would that look like, you ask? If you are prevented by the State (CHP, in your case) from utilizing your coastal summer cabin, that is considered a “taking” and is a direct violation of the 5th Amendment, even if only “temporary” (absent market value compensation from the State). By fact of ownership, you have the “enumerated right” to use and enjoy your property as you wish, within the confines of LEGISLATION to which you voluntarily agree (i.e., environmental regulations concerning such things as burning and waste/trash disposal). There are numerous other examples that can be offered, such as attending worship services (1A, “free exercise” of religion).

18USC242 provides PENALTIES for all involved of violation, right down to the individual officer who would likely use the “I was only following orders.” excuse or, the “greater public safety” canard. Rolled up into this would be the authority who enacted the order; the governor.


39 posted on 04/28/2020 5:04:18 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Scatology is serendipitous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

I’d love to see a slew of 18USC242 actions filed.

L


40 posted on 04/28/2020 5:10:26 AM PDT by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson