Posted on 03/12/2020 9:58:43 PM PDT by CheshireTheCat
Demoncats kill babies. Whose with THAT ???
Hubert Humphrey and Daniel Patrick Moynihan would be repulsed by todays Democrats.
did they liek to kill babies? Or were they against that?
Humphrey was pro life.
Moynihan broke with the Clintons on late term abortion.
Moynihan also pointed out that the welfare system was turning from a safety net to a way of life. I think he used a term like normalizing deviancy, and caught hell from the rest of the Democrats.
Humphrey was also very much pro 2A
thanks- i know there are, or were at least, some pro life liberals-
Today’s leftists surely aint what they used to be=-
And they’d never let JFK in. Harry Truman would be sick of what they are today.
“Demoncats kill babies.”
The demon cats called. They object to their name being used to describe Democrats, as they are only fulfilling a natural albeit marginally satanic purpose. They point out that this was what they were created for, whereas Democrats do that **** by choice. They suggest calling the Democrats by the moniker “Demon rats” as those hellish denizens would not object.
Moynihan heartily endorsed the Butcheress of Benghazi for his Senate seat. He was already way on the left and had a lifetime leftist rating of 94% from the ACU.
A sex predator like JFK not at home with the Dems ? WHUT ?
Nearly all people like freedom, and most people like having more jobs available. We only need to inform many more of them.
There’s nothing liberal about someone who advocates for governmental control of your life from cradle to grave. I don’t like calling today’s democrats liberal either, I usually refer to them as leftists. In reality they’re totalitarian statists who would control every aspect of others lives through government. Liberty and liberal have the same root word Liber which was the name of a Roman god and meant “free one”. Democrats today are obsessed with state control, the notion of “free” doesn’t exist with them unless it’s free stuff for them at the expense of the taxpayers. There’s nothing “liberal” at all about the democratic party of today.
Why they wouldn’t want him would have nothing to do with sex.
I see your point and agree.
Nearly all people like freedom, and most people like having more jobs available. We only need to inform many more of them.
><
If we had an honest media, the Left would be out of business in short order.
The thing that bothers me is the assumption the person would be “frozen in time” and thrust forward X amount of years and would magically be in the opposition. I have little doubt if most of these people were around today, they would’ve “evolved” (or devolved) with the party.
There’s a former Governor of Alabama, John Patterson, nearly 100 years old, he ran against George Wallace in 1958, painting Wallace as a left-wing integrationist radical (the infamous contest where Wallace disavowed his racially moderate agenda and screamed he’d never be “outniggered” again and would be 100% rock-hard on segregation from then on). Patterson was close with the Kennedys (unlike Wallace), even as the KKK-supported candidate. Flash forward 50 years to 2008 and Patterson heartily supported Zero for President as a “loyal Democrat.”
Exactly, 90 year old JFK would have been first in line to endorse Obama.
And you know how I feel about f8888g Truman. I’ll say it again, I first read his speel from 1948 in the year 2000 and it was indistinguishable from Al Gore’s. The only reason he’s not one of our worst Presidents is because there have been some many other democrat pigs who were even worse.
You mean we have to start from scratch and re-teach them Americanism?
Bump!
There was something strange as to Moynihan stepping aside for Hilary. As in he was encouraged to step aside. Threatened with suicide?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.