[yesthatjallen]

That's all John wrote other than 'Developing'.

[Responsibility2nd]

He deserves one. Between the Obama Judge, The Obama prosecutors. And that Obama loving lead juror - he never had a chance.

He really deserves more than a new trial. He deserves to have all charges dismissed.

[JoSixChip]

I’d ask for a new judge to. Not that he will get ether.

[JonPreston]

Assuming he gets a new trial, it’s up to Justice to refile. What will Bob Barr do?????

[centurion316]

Apparently, Roger Stone himself may be his biggest enemy. He is said to have left more than enough evidence in his text messages. A treasure trove, as it was characterized by a prosecutor who has seen the evidence. His only hope is probably that the government would decide that a new trial would not be worth the effort.

[conservative98]

He deserves Barr to put down the bagpipes and drop the charges.

Stop tweeting. I'm bagpiping here!!!

[Gay State Conservative]

I've only been called to a courthouse twice to serve on a jury.I was called about 10 years ago but,when I reached the entrance to the courthouse,a man in uniform looked at my card and said I wasn't needed and that I could go home.I was also called a couple of years ago.On that occasion I was told I needn't serve because I wouldn't be impartial.It was a drunk driver case and when I told the judge that my niece was killed by a drunk driver (which was true) he said "go home,you're dismissed".

I don't know if there are occasions when a potential juror is asked about political beliefs...but in a case like Stone's one would think that such questions might be asked.If any of the jurors in the Stone case had strong political opinions...as the foreman of his jury clearly did...that juror should have been dismissed.

Sounds like juror misconduct (or even perjury) to me...meaning verdict must be thrown out and new trial ordered.

[ETCM]

The man has been in jail for over a year, virtually bankrupted, had his name dragged through the mud, and his life is in ruins, all for “process crimes” brought during a hoax investigation and failed attempt to topple a President. Tried by a corrupt judge and prosecutors, and convicted by a biased jury. What an injustice. What a Country.

[RooRoobird20]

Even Eddie Munster—who hates all things Trump—said what the deceptive jury foreman did was really bad and that Stone should have a new trial.

The corrupt jury foreman should face charges for lying to the judge about who she was and because of her outrageous public anti-Trump bias. She absolutely deceived the judge and the court, she needs to be held accountable.

[Old Retired Army Guy]

This Judge will not let that happen, but it will provide a good basis for Appeal which has a good chance of succeeding.

[lastchance]

There was nothing potential about the bias.

[lastchance]

There was nothing potential about the bias.

[tallyhoe]

He should ask for and get a new trail!

[T Ruth]

Hart’s role as the jury foreperson became publicly known Wednesday when she confirmed to CNN that she had written a Facebook post defending the prosecutors in Stone’s case.

Especially as Hart is a lawyer, she would have had a large influence on the other jurors.

Every aspect of this trial was corrupt: the prosecution, the judge, and the jury.

[griswold3]

freerogerstone.com FWIW

[DoodleDawg]

That’ll be a big, fat “no” from the judge on that one. May help with the appeal though.

[preacher]

L8r

[JerseyDvl]

So he can be found guilty again?

[tbw2]

Roger Stone jury foreperson comes forward to defend prosecutors - but social media history of the failed Democrat candidate reveals she mocked his arrest, labeled Trump supporters racist and posed with ex-DNC chair Donna Brazil
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7998815/Tomeka-Hart-Roger-Stone-jury-foreperson-revealed-anti-Trump-activist.html