Posted on 02/06/2020 10:56:57 AM PST by Kaslin
To the extent that Mitt Romney, handsome rich guy, is a sympathetic figure, it is because his attempts to prostrate himself before the left fail so consistently. The binders full of women comment, perverted as it was by the media, was also a total capitulation to the idea that there ought to be more quotas and affirmative action in hiring. But even then even then! they still painted him and Paul Ryan as racists who wanted to kill grandma and crawl through your window at night to steal your birth control. The lesson Republican voters took away was: whats the point in nominating some nice guy? So they stopped.
I will brook no argument that anyone has a stronger negative opinion about Mitt Romney than me. It is no secret. From the moment Romney told me in the only interview weve ever done, in 2006, that he never considered himself pro-choice despite also being the same man who ran to Ted Kennedys left on the issue Ive thought of him as the definition of the chameleon-like politician who aspires to patrician statesmanship. His technocratic approach to politics rankles, his hubris is without charm, and his outward niceties do nothing to disguise his clumsily savage approach to politics. He lost in 2008 when every other candidate hated him, and won in 2012 by nuking anyone more likable than him from orbit with a metric ton of cash. Hugh Hewitt wrote an entire chunk in his book, A Mormon in the White House, just dedicated to rebutting me.
That he would run for Senate struck me as a way to salvage his political career after a loss, but also to potentially chart a path back to leadership. Maybe not the White House, but if Romney could remake himself as so many American politicians have into a leader within the body, whos to say he couldnt have a fourth act? The unsubtle secondary reason, of course, is in case of disaster, break glass where a Mueller Report that eradicates the Trump presidency provides Romney that long dreamed of opportunity to save Republican hopes. Arise! Your man on a horse is here.
Alas! His hopes dashed, Romney is now relegated to a body he clearly finds frustrating. Yesterday John Cornyn was asked about Romneys decision to vote to convict on the first article he split his vote, he is Mitt Romney after all and he responded that Romney keeps his own counsel as a Senator. But thats because he doesnt really want to be a Senator. A Senator who wanted to lead and believed deeply that Trump deserved conviction would have worked tirelessly to convince his fellow Republican Senators to join him in this vote. Instead, Romney waited until after the decisions made by all his fellow Republicans were announced to take his stand ineffective as the protesters outside. Except to the extent it is helpful to the campaigns of Democratic candidates running against Cory Gardner and Susan Collins.
(Perhaps my favorite plot point of the whole thing was Romneys decision to give not one, but three exclusive branded interviews to The Atlantic, Deseret News, and Chris Wallace at Fox. Oh, Mitt.)
As for Trump, the past month must seem like a glee-filled dream. He has soundly defeated his political adversaries in their attempt to remove him from office. He has killed terrorists at will and not gotten sucked into another war. He closed trade deals, crushed a State of the Union, and watched his strongest potential general election opponent crumble. He enjoys the economic winds at his back, a Republican Party at their highest popularity in 15 years, and his highest personal rating since he was inaugurated. And at the end of the day, the one Republican out of the 250 in Congress who broke with him is the one he most enjoys having as a political foil.
What Milt didn't realize is that Schitt has got a lisp, and that he hangs around with Ed Buck.
You can bet that come payday, Schitt will be behind Mitt all the way...
uh oh, are YOU gonna get in trouble with that post, ha!
but anyway it will generate far more interesting replies than more discussion about the Utah dickhead
You nailed it. Greasy sleazy conman RomneyRat.
"Benedict Arnold made the Revolutionary War bi-partisan."
Nobody respects a traitor, not even the side he helped.
Well how do you trust him now that he’s on your side?
Money covers a lot of blemishes and character faults.
You don’t. He’s made himself completely ineffective in the Senate. I would be mad if I voted for him.
I realized Fully that he was a narcissist when he boxed holeyfield for charity.
There’s LOTS of ways to raise money for charity besides making yourself look like a buffoon.
Only problem is he didn’t think he looked like a buffoon.
Because he’s a narcissist.
So many narcissists can’t take that Trump has what they want. The adoration of the people.
romney, mccain before him, bloomberg, soros and more.
To paraphrase Citizen Kane..they want people to love them but on their terms.
Nobody respects a traitor, not even the side he helped.
—
Of course.
If Romney had all the integrity he claims he has would resign and stand for election to see if the people of Utah agree with his position.
A worthless piece of feces. I didn’t vote for him in 2012, so my conscience is clear. But Mitt should have easily won in 2012 when it was quite obvious what an inept and incompetent buffoon B Hussein Obama was, and an economy that just wasn’t recovering. But Mitt couldn’t even pull it off when running against the worst president in our nation’s history. Ironically, Mitt’s legacy is by losing in 2012, he paved the way for Donald Trump in 2016. And for that, our nation should be eternally grateful.
Romney needs to run against Trump for POTUS, just so he can lose and get it rubbed in his face that he lost and won’t ever be POTUS.
Chamberlain may have been fooled at Munich but even Winston Churchill had praise for his later activities after he woke up to the fact that Hitler couldn't be trusted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.