Posted on 02/01/2020 4:59:19 PM PST by Kaslin
Senators who are running to replace Trump should automatically be disqualified.
And yet an unelected official prevented Rand Paul from getting his question answered.
Democrats complained that this is a trial needing witnesses.
Jurors, which 4 Senators running against the President are in this trial, should be excused due to biad against the defendant just like in any other trial.
Too late. Justice Roberts gave himself the badge of Supreme Authority when he declined to read Sen Paul’s question.
This is true.
Yes! Why shouldn’t the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court break the law to pwn the libs!
And the Dems sure the hell aren';t gonna play that card. Not with the girls on the court.
“It is true that even if a certain act amounts to ‘precedent’, as in the case of Johnson’s impeachment, it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s correct”
This quote will be remembered, if Roe v Wade ever gets readdressed in court.
I would think that Roberts was looking forward to possibility of the whistle blower being involved in one or more court cases. They would, undoubtedly, go all the way to the Supreme Court of the US. If Roberts had allowed the man’s name to be known, when the case(s) reached the Supreme Court he would have to recuse himself.
“”should another motion garner such a close result.””
I would think that Schumer would be all finished with his motions. He wasted the time he wanted to waste on Friday and shouldn’t be given any more time.
“”And yet an unelected official prevented Rand Paul from getting his question answered.””
From even being ASKED!!
Senators who are running to replace Trump should automatically be disqualified.
They should have been banned from any entrance into the Capitol building during their Faux Impeachment bs.
Rams Paul should have screamed out his name and ask Roberts as head of the FISA courts what is he hiding? He would have gotten so much media.
Nor should he EVER has self-decided to adjudicate the Senator’s questions-— as he did with Rand Paul and the Eric Ciaramella question.
Which was brilliant, btw— and exposed Robert’s Deep State connex, either due to agreement with this ruling class of Stasi spy state, or due to the blackmail the Deep State has continued on him, from the time of a Chief Justice writing LAW from the bench and declaring the Healthcare Mandate— a TAX... when it never was. That sort of thing.
He exhibits any more behaviour of the like and it IS time to Impeach the Chief Justice.
Indeed they should be “RECUSED” from voting, because of Conflict of Interest.
That would remove Klobuchar, Sanders and Warren-— just like that. They really should not be voting on conviction of a known Presidential candidate that would face them. In fact, their voting of the conviction... would set in motion legal challenges.
Because voting for conviction on clearly NON-impeachable acts— is Against the Constituion. Period.
And even SCOTUS would recognize that, not being asleep except for Baeder Meinhof Ginsburg.
I dont know who is in the middle of this media scrum but It is hilarious. The short dude on the outside doesnt stand a chance
https://twitter.com/PeterHamby/status/1223292927503405056
An unelected chief justice who is blackmailed should not make any decisions affecting the rest of our lives. In that category certainly resides Healthcare.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.