And yet an unelected official prevented Rand Paul from getting his question answered.
I would think that Roberts was looking forward to possibility of the whistle blower being involved in one or more court cases. They would, undoubtedly, go all the way to the Supreme Court of the US. If Roberts had allowed the man’s name to be known, when the case(s) reached the Supreme Court he would have to recuse himself.
“”And yet an unelected official prevented Rand Paul from getting his question answered.””
From even being ASKED!!
Amazing conservative statement.......underlining what we here all believe: the people are in control of the government.
==================================================
ROBERTS SUMS UP: I think it would be inappropriate for me, an unelected official from a different branch of government,
to assert the power to change that result so that the motion would succeed, he explained.
Just wondering....does that also apply to interim appointees to the Congress?