Posted on 01/13/2020 5:14:31 PM PST by conservative98
The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal by three women arrested for violating a New Hampshire city ordinance by exposing their breasts in public as part of the so-called "Free the Nipple" movement.
The rejection leaves in place a 2019 ruling by New Hampshire's top court that upheld their convictions for violating a Laconia, N.H., measure that prohibits female toplessness in public. The women -- Heidi Lilley, Kia Sinclair and Ginger Pierro -- argued the ban violates the Constitution.
The ordinance makes it illegal to uncover female breasts “with less than a fully opaque covering of any part of the nipple.” The women said it punishes women for exposing their breasts while allowing men to go topless in public.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
The topless season in New England is short.
“Because you argued breasts are not sexual.”
They control blood flow in a normal male. Amazing.
I would recommend Nitric Acid after that.
Have these women not heard of pasties?
They have a Free the Nipple event in Asheville every year. You need eye bleach after seeing the participants.
In addition to droopytitz, she’s also suffering from Frontward Butt Syndrome.
Most that want to show them are the ones you don’t particularly want to see.
____________________________________
Sometimes that is true...Sometimes that is not the case...
When the weather is very good, I sometimes go to Venice Beach...I go there to exercise. It is hard to believe...But, you sometimes see women go topless...Some are ugly...Some are not ugly...
By the way, it is not legal for women to go topless while sunbathing on Venice Beach...Apparently LAPD officers are not busy trying to make sure women keep their tops on...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.