Posted on 01/13/2020 5:14:31 PM PST by conservative98
The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal by three women arrested for violating a New Hampshire city ordinance by exposing their breasts in public as part of the so-called "Free the Nipple" movement.
The rejection leaves in place a 2019 ruling by New Hampshire's top court that upheld their convictions for violating a Laconia, N.H., measure that prohibits female toplessness in public. The women -- Heidi Lilley, Kia Sinclair and Ginger Pierro -- argued the ban violates the Constitution.
The ordinance makes it illegal to uncover female breasts with less than a fully opaque covering of any part of the nipple. The women said it punishes women for exposing their breasts while allowing men to go topless in public.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I'm going to need a bigger jug! (just NOT those jugs!)
Most American women look and act like prostitutes anyway.
Objection, your honor. Objection.
Res ipsa loquitur. (It speaks for itself.)
Travesty of justice!
nice set of tats
freedom is the mother’s milk of our country
Lordy..
Accedo ut scamnum honos?
Sed hoc non dicitur de multis mulieribus.
((May I approach the bench, your honor?
The statement does not apply to many women.))
Haha, good! (Why of a sudden do I have a craving for warm milk?)
Well, I didn’t need your warning.
That one deserves the full Muslim treatment, head to foot with a little slit to see through.
Just picture Helen Thomas, RBG, Rosa Delorio. THAT should make you change your tune!
But as with abortion, to support this right a myriad of others will become entangled and compromised.
the constitution provides equal justice under the law.
the constitution provides equal justice under the law.
*****************************
You forgot your sarc tag.
You get arrested and fined for being topless, I don’t that’s not equal justice.
“Where the hell in the Constitution is there the right to go topless? “
It’s not prohibited. Maybe it’s covered by the right to keep and bare arms, legs, breasts?
“...with less than a fully opaque covering of any part of the nipple.
That sucks. Who the hell do they think they are writing laws like that?
Nah, I'd rather picture this, and what a tune:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.