IF nanzi ever ponies up the documents that is.
1 posted on
01/08/2020 11:17:14 AM PST by
rktman
To: rktman
NAnZI?
Very tempting when it comes to the masters of deceit, propaganda, and defending those who work to kill our people.
2 posted on
01/08/2020 11:21:27 AM PST by
DoughtyOne
(The Leftistist media and particularly CNN NEWS should come with a ten day supply of Cipro.)
To: rktman
Why should he back down now?
What possible reason, what possible gain?
3 posted on
01/08/2020 11:22:11 AM PST by
samtheman
(I hope someone close to Trump is reading FR every day.)
To: rktman
The report today is that DiFi told Nancy to get the lead out and transmit the articles
4 posted on
01/08/2020 11:22:20 AM PST by
bert
( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
To: rktman
Did they ever release all the transcripts?
5 posted on
01/08/2020 11:22:49 AM PST by
McGavin999
(“Look into it” does not mean dig up dirt, it means find the truth)
To: rktman
Did they have the vote to adopt the Clinton rules?
6 posted on
01/08/2020 11:23:31 AM PST by
Magnum44
(My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
To: rktman
he’s already caving in to the Democrats demands. Full cave-in is just right around the corner now.
7 posted on
01/08/2020 11:25:16 AM PST by
Bullish
(Covfefe Happens)
To: rktman
Why wait? The Articles of impeachment should be in the House records. Hold your discussions and then dismiss as not prosecutable.
8 posted on
01/08/2020 11:25:40 AM PST by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said theoal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
To: rktman
9 posted on
01/08/2020 11:26:10 AM PST by
McBuff
(To be, rather than to seem)
To: rktman
McConnell described a "Phase One" of the trial, which would include arguments from both the prosecution and the defenseThis makes no sense. There is no prosecution. As we all know, Nancy has refused to deliver the articles. So there is no valid process for an argument from the "prosecution".
12 posted on
01/08/2020 11:44:31 AM PST by
Responsibility2nd
(As a matter of fact, I DID only read the excerpt. OK, I intended to. Next time for sure.)
To: rktman
IF nanzi ever ponies up the documents that is.
Well come on.. Nancy needs to have a guarantee on the outcome of a Senate trial before she submits the Articles.
I guess Mitch is saying “ You have to pass the articles to us before you can read our conclusion.”
To: rktman
Let the Rats have their witnesses, and Trump can have his...both whistle blowjobbers, the President of Ukraine, both the former and present prosecutors of Ukraine.
16 posted on
01/08/2020 12:19:42 PM PST by
davidb56
To: rktman
from senators, who are not allowed to speak during the trial.Could we make this rule permanent?
17 posted on
01/08/2020 12:25:39 PM PST by
Raycpa
To: rktman
Witnesses are the last thing either side wants or needs.
The dims have none, and the thugs are as guilty of Ukrainian laundering as they are.
21 posted on
01/08/2020 12:28:03 PM PST by
rawcatslyentist
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfuAJcWl6DE Kill a Commie for Mommie)
To: rktman
....”arguments from both the prosecution and the defense”....
Letting the Demo-rats continue to expose themselves...
23 posted on
01/08/2020 12:32:03 PM PST by
caww
To: rktman
McConnell will treat a make-believe case against Trump as if it is based on reality.
Something is not right.
The shooting civil war might start this year.
27 posted on
01/08/2020 1:27:31 PM PST by
odawg
To: rktman
First, the Republicans should hear all the Republican witnesses that the democrats controlling the House hearings would not allow, and that was all of them. Then they should do the same and not allow any democratic witnesses.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
