Posted on 12/31/2019 8:58:40 AM PST by SeekAndFind
In 2008, as the Obama administration prepared to take control in Washington, retired Army Gen. Barry McCaffrey offered a list of bold predictions for the coming five years. Some of them bore out: The economy performed well globally despite the Great Recession, relations with Russia became more hostile without devolving into outright dysfunction, and the United States withdrew from Iraq right at the 36-month mark, which McCaffrey specified. Other predictions, such as a North Korean collapse, improved prospects for success in Afghanistan following a massive commitment of resources, and a nuclear breakout for Iran, never occurred.
A year later, geopolitical analyst George Friedman published the widely read “The Next 100 Years.” Like McCaffrey, Friedman correctly predicted a new cold war between the United States and Russia, but he also foresaw the emergence of Turkey as a major regional power, the consequences of demographic change in Europe and North America, and tensions between the United States and Mexico as instability in Latin America threatens to generate a crisis on the southern border. Friedman got some things wrong, to be sure, but the number of things he got right is fascinating.
Making accurate predictions is no easy feat, leading some to take the “wait and see” approach. However, I offer six predictions, in no particular order, that will have serious implications for American national security and foreign policy in the 2020s.
The American left, along with its compatriots in the media, have thrown everything toward fashioning Russia as a geopolitical menace that must be defeated at all costs, lest it conquer all of Europe and facilitate the electoral victory of the “wrong” presidential candidate once again. This is quite a departure from earlier this decade, when the prevailing wisdom was that the 1980s wanted its foreign policy back.
Russia no doubt possesses geopolitical clout, a large economy, and a strong military. But Russia is a dying country. Its aging population is wracked by poor health, combined with minuscule growth following decades of decline. Most, if not all, projections show considerable population loss for Russia by mid-century.
Russia’s dependence on oil and natural gas also belies the size of its economy. Extreme sensitivity to the price of oil equals prolonged periods of economic instability, leading to greater poverty and domestic discontent, forcing Russia to scale back its global role. Despite its instrumental role in saving the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad, history may well look back on Russian foreign policy in the 2010s as an aberration, as realities on the home front mean the bear may soon go into hibernation indefinitely.
Inspiring as the Hong Kong protests have been to lovers of democracy and freedom all over, it’s a movement destined for failure. Without direct intervention from the outside, the protesters will never overcome the sheer might and violence the Communist Party of China can bring to bear. The protests will eventually fizzle out, or Beijing will decide, as it did in Tiananmen Square three decades ago, to end the uprising once and for all.
When Beijing doubles down, the world will be unable to do little differently than it does now: offer platitudes of support for the freedom-fighters, enact limited sanctions, and harshly condemn the socialist state. Beyond that, however, not a single country, the United States included, is willing to risk a confrontation with a nuclear-armed power that’s also the world’s second-largest economy over the fate of Hong Kong.
Meanwhile, the People’s Republic will continue its campaign of terror against its own citizens, most notably the Uyghurs of Xinjiang Province, to ensure total obedience of its population to the Communist Party and the rule of President Xi Jinping and, as some reports suggest, to ethnically cleanse the Uyghurs from China. With time, this same strategy will be applied to China’s other ethnic and religious minorities. When its economy eventually declines, expect to see a level of totalitarianism unseen since the days of Mao Zedong.
“Japan was, is, and will be the major power in Asia, not China,” says retired Army Col. Douglas Macgregor. “China is a large, lumbering brontosaurus with an insatiable appetite for food and energy. Japan is analogous to a pack of [velociraptors].”
To be sure, Japan faces substantial obstacles, not the least of which its aging population and economic stagnation. As Macgregor observes, however, Japan is blessed with features that set it aside from other countries facing similar challenges: “Japan and Germany were alike in that both states emerged as very homogenous populations with a strong, cohesive society supported by an effective culture. Germany now confronts serious internal weaknesses, while Japan has avoided that outcome and, as a result, is in a very strong position for the future.”
The inevitable Chinese decline will create a power vacuum, which Tokyo may ably fill. Murmurings of a shift in Japan’s foreign policy will become more real as Beijing continues to pose a regional security threat, combined with the ongoing nuclear crisis in Korea. The already firm U.S.-Japanese alliance will become even stronger and more important, reinforcing Japan’s emergence as Asia’s top power and guaranteeing America’s access to the economies and markets of the region.
Speaking of Germany:
Brexit may be all the rage now, but all eyes will be on Germany in the 2020s. Arguably the leading continental power and the linchpin of the EU, Berlin will be forced to confront myriad challenges that will define its fate and that of Europe for decades to come. These include a demographic crisis, the migrant influx that refuses to abate, and the pressure that accompanies being the one country responsible for sustaining the EU experiment.
It’ll be interesting to see what happens after 2021, when Angela Merkel is expected to step down as chancellor. If the 2017 federal election was any signal, significant percentages of German voters are no longer buying what the more establishment, centrist parties are selling. Germany may well follow the United Kingdom and United States in a more nationalist, populist direction, especially with trouble lurking on the economic horizon.
By the end of the 2020s, all the crises and the pressure will add up to create enough enthusiasm for a departure from the EU, which will then experience an existential crisis. It’s difficult to say whether Germany would actually leave, given the difficulties Britain is enduring in its own attempt. But history makes this much certain: Where Germany goes, continental Europe follows.
If the situation at the U.S.-Mexico border isn’t yet a crisis, it’ll become one in the 2020s. Mexico, which saw nearly 30,000 killed in 2019 due to the drug war, will continue to be consumed by the inferno. Nor is the problem limited to Mexico. Extraordinary levels of violence, corruption, and instability in Central America are the primary movers of northerly migration.
Even relatively stable South America isn’t quite so these days. Venezuela teeters on the brink following its disastrous two-decade experiment with socialism, creating a brand-new migrant crisis. Crime, an economic crisis, and corruption embroil Brazil, once considered an emerging great power. The long-term forecast for Latin America is gloomy.
In fact, by the mid-2020s, the United States will feel a noticeable political shift as the left reaches a breaking point over its support for illegal immigration, similar to its breaking point over homelessness. It’ll be impossible to ignore the glaring contradiction of promoting de facto open borders while decrying increasing levels of poverty, overcrowding, and declining quality of life, coupled with ever-increasing levels of violence. Likewise, the inability of any nation to sustain an influx of low-skill migrants who ultimately depend more on state and society than the reverse will become more apparent.
This is hardly a comprehensive list of predictions. Missing are those pertaining to the endless wars in the Greater Middle East, the enduring threat Islamist militants pose, the conflict with Iran that’ll soon enter its fourth decade, and the lingering question of North Korea disarmament. The futures I’ve offered here, however, if they come to pass, will have the most lasting effects upon America in the 2020s and beyond. May the 2020s prove more peaceful and prosperous than the decade we leave behind.
I don’t agree with any of them.
Edward Chang hates the Chicoms.
What sort of "direct intervention from the outside" could protect the HK protestors from the fate they are asking for?
1. Democrats, Deep State, Left Wing Media, and Democrat/Deep State allies outside the U.S.
2. Iran will be a pain in our backside until that is resolved. Hopefully before they nuke anyone.
3. China will be a bit of a paper tiger. They will have a lot of big boy military toys, but without the human means to effectively employ them. Economically they will continue to just stave off collapse due to massive corporate debt.
4. Africa. A lot of work needs to be done there to keep it from being a colossal mess that we have to deal with later.
5. Russia can never be off the list, but I see it settling down even more with President Trump at the helm.
A note about the EU: The U.K. has been a top three contributer to the EU budget. This will create a significant strain on the others. The EU unelected leadership will not want to cut their budget, so the other countries will have to make up the difference. All eyes will turn to Germany (#1 payor) and France (#2 payor). France is having serious internal problems and Germany will not want to pay a third of the overall bill. Add to that a peaceful revolt in Germany that will likely take them out of the EU as well.
Germany leaving EU is the biggest joke I ever heard. EU is basically Germany’s 4th Reich. Why would they leave?
As for Russia its collapse within a next five years is perpetually predicted since 1240.
The article just says Russia Will Lose Great Power Status, not that it will collapse ( Well, technically, it’s USSR empire collapsed already ).
RE: I don’t agree with any of them.
It would be more helpful if you could elaborate on your reasons why.
It’s hard for Russian to maintain military superpower status with a second rate economy.
Points 1,3 and 4 are highly unlikely in the next 5 years.
Russia still has military clout and an internal economy.
Japan is still declining and refusing to recognize that and take measures
Germany isn’t going to leave the EU by 2025
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.