Posted on 12/20/2019 6:59:26 AM PST by Kaslin
When the Department of Justice inspector general released his report on Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act abuse, coverage focused on the top-line findings contained in the executive summary. Then the news cycle whizzed by, leaving many details discussed throughout the 480-page tome unexplored.
One significant gap in media coverage concerns the potential complicity of former FBI Director James Comey in the FISA abusea possibility the IG report hints at in several spots. The first suggestion that something was amiss with Comeys conduct came early in Inspector General Michael Horowitzs report, when the IGs office spoke of the methodology underlying the FISA investigation.
Certain former FBI employees who agreed to interviews, including Comey and Baker, chose not to request that their security clearances be reinstated for their OIG interviews, read the IG report. Therefore, we were unable to provide classified information or documents to them during their interviews to develop their testimony, or to assist their recollections of relevant events.
Taken alone, this perfunctory comment might have meant little, but the IG report would stress this point several more times throughout its 400-plus-page analysis of FBI misconduct.
For instance, according to the IG report, Baker said he obtained more information regarding Ohrs interactions with Steele during a Crossfire Hurricane leadership meeting with Comey and McCabe in spring 2017. Baker further stated that he learned that Ohr was providing to the FBI information that Ohr had received from Steele, and, in Bakers view, this [was] not good.
But Comey told the IG he had no knowledge of Ohrs communications with members of the Crossfire Hurricane investigative team and only discovered Ohrs association with Steele and the Crossfire Hurricane investigation when the media reported on it. Comeys claims, though, conflicted with both Bakers statements, and notes taken by Strzok during a November 23, 2016 Crossfire Hurricane update meeting that Comey attended.
Those notes referenced a discussion at the meeting concerning strategy for engagement [with Handling Agent 1] and Ohr regarding Steeles reporting. Strzok also told the IG that he believed he informed FBI leadership that Ohr approached the FBI concerning his relationship with Steele and that Ohr relayed Steeles information regarding Russia to the team.
However, as the IG report explained, because Strzoks notes of the meeting were classified at the time we interviewed Comey, and Comey chose not to have his security clearances reinstated for his OIG interview, we were unable to show him the notes and ask about the reference in them to Steele and Ohr.
The IG report also stressed Comeys lack of a security clearance in discussing inconsistencies between his and former Attorney General Loretta Lynchs statements to the IG. The report noted that Lynch told the OIG that after one of her weekly security meetings at FBI Headquarters in the spring of 2016, Comey and McCabe pulled her aside and provided information about Carter Page, which Lynch believed they learned from another member of the Intelligence Community.
Lynch further stated that Comey and McCabe informed her that Russian intelligence reportedly planned to use Page for information and to develop other contacts in the United States, and that they were interested in his affiliation with the campaign. According to the IG report, Lynchs understanding was that this information from Comey and McCabe was preliminary in that they did not state that any decisions or actions needed to be taken that day.
Lynch added that they discussed the possibility of providing a defensive briefing to the Trump campaign, but she believed it was preliminary and something that might happen down the road, but that she did not recall receiving any further updates on this issue following this conversation.
The IG report noted that Lynchs recollection of what Comey and McCabe told her is consistent with information referenced in connection with the 2015 [Southern District of New York] indictment and subsequent conviction of a Russian intelligence officer referenced earlier in this chapter. However, Comey told the OIG that he did not recall having such a conversation with Lynch, and that he did not think it was possible for such a conversation to have occurred in the spring of 2016 because the FBI did not receive the [Friendly Foreign Government] information concerning Papadopoulos until late July.
Comey also told the IG that he did not recall himself having any knowledge of Carter Page’s existence until the middle of 2016. But, as the IG report stressed, Comeys statements are called into question by internal email communications that reflect that in April 2016, the New York Field Office prepared summaries of the information that ultimately led NYFO to open a counterintelligence investigation on Carter Page on April 6, 2016. Those were provided to officials at headquarters for a Directors note; and a separate Director’s Brief to be held on April 27, 2016.
Notwithstanding these inconsistencies, the IG report stressed, that the IG was unable to question Comey further using classified details Lynch described to us because, as noted in Chapter One, Comey choose not to have his security clearances reinstated for our interview.
The IG report then stresses twice more Comeys lack of a security clearance as a reason investigators were unable to assess Comeys level of knowledge of the facts misstated in the FISA applications. In discussing the extent of FBI leaderships knowledge as to each fact stated incorrectly or omitted from the FISA applicationsseven significant inaccuracies and omissions in totalthe IG stressed that multiple factors made it difficult to assess the knowledge of the FBI hierarchy.
These factors included, among other things, the IG report noted, limited recollections, the inability to question Comey or refresh his recollection with relevant, classified documentation because of his lack of a security clearance, and the absence of meeting minutes that would show the specific details shared with Comey and McCabe during briefings they received, beyond the more general investigative updates that we know they were provided.
However, while noting the IGs inability to determine the extent of FBI leaderships knowledge, the report highlighted reasons to believe such knowledge existed: As the FBI’s senior leaders, Comey and McCabe would have had greater access to case information than Department leadership and also more interaction with senior [Counterintelligence Division] officials and the investigation team. Further, as described in Chapter Three, [Counterintelligence Division] officials orally briefed the Crossfire Hurricane cases to FBI senior leadership throughout the investigation. McCabe received more briefings than Comey, but both received oral briefings of the teams investigative activities.
The IG then reiterated this point later, stating that although they found no evidence that Comey had been made aware of these issues at the time he certified the application, there were multiple factors making it difficult for us to precisely determine the extent of FBI leaderships knowledge as to each fact that was not shared with OI and not included, or inaccurately stated, in the FISA applications.
These factors, the IG explained, included, among other things, limited recollections, the inability to question Comey or refresh his recollection with relevant, classified documentation because of his lack of a security clearance, and the absence of meeting minutes that would show the specific details shared with Comey and McCabe during briefings they received, beyond the more general investigative updates that we know they were provided.
As these excerpts illustrate, the IG report concluded that several of Comeys statements were inconsistent with statements provided by other individuals connected with the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, as well as other evidence gathered as part of the FISA investigation. Investigators with the IGs office were unable to resolve the conflicts or to fully assess Comeys complicity in the filing of the fraudulent FISA applications because Comey claimed limited recall and then refused to have his security clearance reinstated. That prevented the IG team from sharing documents with Comey to either refresh his recollection or to question him about statements made in those classified documents.
In short, then, Comey avoided the difficult questions and the possibility of having no satisfactory answers, by hiding behind the lack of his security clearance. Yet, because of the breadth and depth of Horowitzs investigation, the contradictions in Comeys testimony and his of gaming the classification system exposed in the IG report has gone unnoticed.
So much so, in fact, that Comey felt comfortable taking a victory lap immediately after the IG report released. But after telling Chris Wallace the IG report was a vindication, when pushed, Comey admitted the FBI did not handle the FISA process in a thoughtful and appropriate way. Yet, Comey portrayed himself as a mere bystander to the misconduct, telling Wallace:
I was overconfident in the procedures that the FBI and Justice had built over 20 years. I thought they were robust enough. It’s incredibly hard to get a FISA. I was overconfident in those. Because he’s right. There was real sloppiness, 17 things that either should’ve been in the applications or at least discussed and characterized differently. . . I’m responsible for it. That’s why I’m telling you I was wrong. I was overconfident as director in our procedures and it’s important that a leader be accountable and transparent.
However, when asked what he knew about the FISA applications and the misrepresentations and omissions highlighted by Horowitz, Comey deflected, responding, First, again, the report will speak for itself, before claiming I didn’t know the particulars of the investigation. As a director sitting on top of an organization of 38,000 people, you can’t run an investigation that’s seven layers below you.
While Wallace did not call Comey out on his claim that the investigation was seven layers below him, Attorney General William Barr did a few days later when he joined Martha MacCallum for an exclusive interview. The Fox News reporter noted that Comey had claimed he was seven steps removed from what was going on, the director doesnt get involved in these kinds of things, the actual investigation. Do you believe that? MacCallum queried.
No, Barr replied, I think that one of the problems with what happened was it was run and bird-dogged by a very small group of very high-level officials. And the idea that this was seven layers below him is simply not true.
Barr also took issue with Comeys premise that criticism of the FBI is an attack.
One of the things that I object to is the tack being taken by Comey, which is to suggest that people who are criticizing or trying to get to the bottom of the misconduct are somehow attacking the FBI. I think that is nonsense, Barr said. Were criticizing and concerned about misconduct by a few actors at the top of the FBI, and they should be criticized if they engaged in serious misconduct.
Barrs correct, of course. But the unanswered question is whether Comey was one of those few actors at the top who engaged in serious misconduct. The IG report didnt answer that question, but dropped enough hints to suggest that its a real possibility.
Hints? Oh boy, another sternly written memo. /s
Ya think?
No....I’m pretty sure that bad stuff was “seven layers down.” /s/
There’s nothing I love more than a stern letter.
“In on”? Is that the same as “co-conspirator”?
No, Barr replied, I think that one of the problems with what happened was it was run and bird-dogged by a very small group of very high-level officials. And the idea that this was seven layers below him is simply not true.
I’m trying to remember the last time anyone besides a Democrat actually called someone else a LIAR.
Comey said some really stupid things...I am really busy overseeing 28,000 agents. And this was 7 layers down from me. Agents handle it. That's the gist...
EXCEPT, he took the dossier to the President, signed off on it for a FISA.
And acted as if it wasn't important...ridiculous.
Barr talks like a guy who has the goods.
Comey sounds scared.
Bottom line: Comey’s signature is on a FISA application, SWEARING that the Woods Process was followed and the data truthful and validated.
Comey KNEW it was not truthful, and KNEW it was not validated by the Woods Procedure, but he signed off on it.
I do think he plays chess in his head.....and he's very good at it.
Sick of hearing..hints, intent, mistakes...IF ANYONE of us would’ve done 1/2 of what the swamp bastards had done we would be in jail in a heartbeat!! They would’ve dragged our coccus out of bed early in the wee hours of the night and frogged marched to prison, gas chamber or to the Electric chair!
Comey is an enormous liar.
No way he wasn’t in on every detail of the Clinton and Trump investigations.
An enormous case like investigating a Presidential candidate and sitting President, an he doesn’t know every detail? Yeah right.
Unless, investigating and spying on republican candidates is common practice for the FBI. Look at the Mitt Romney melt down. Maybe the FBI let him in on a “dossier” about him in 2012.
Let’s not forget that Comey went to try to trap Trump to “inform” him about the dossier.
Comey needs to go down. (to jail) and so does Brennan.
If they don’t, there is no equal justice in the US. And then All laws are moot.
BTW, I love Seven Layer Dip.
“Barr shot the hell out of that little Comey fairy tale.”
AG Barr is all but foreshadowing that Comey has legal problems of a criminal kind.
Bump
CNN is reporting on this - not.
"Misconduct" is like using "misbehaving" to define a gang shoot out.
INDICTMENTS and PROSECUTIONS are what should be the focus.
“And the idea that this was seven layers below him is simply not true.
Well, don’t go Sessions on us...
This FISA situation is getting ugly enough that someone may have to take a fall in order to let the bigger players in the Deep State walk. James Comey might have been informally nominated as the sacrificial lamb. While it would be very satisfying to see this smug piece of crap take a fall, it would be unsatisfying if he was the last person to take a fall rather than the first in a long series.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.