Posted on 12/03/2019 12:51:54 PM PST by Morgana
Elizabeth Warren continued to show her devotion to the abortion industry Monday by promising to wear a pink Planned Parenthood scarf to the inauguration if she wins the presidency.
Speaking at a University of Iowa town hall in Iowa City, the Democrat presidential candidate said she wore the scarf twice before to important political events, and she will wear it again, according to Business & Politics Review.
Warren, who is touting a radical pro-abortion platform that includes unrestricted abortions up to birth and taxpayer-funded abortions, described her fashion choice in response to a question about making “reproductive health care easily accessible to all women,” Disrn reports.
“I made the decision when Donald Trump was elected — I decided I would go to the inauguration … but it was important to me what I wore,” Warren responded. “I’ll tell you what I wore: I wore my scarf that has in big letters on it embroidered, ‘Planned Parenthood.’”
Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion chain in America. Last year, the abortion group reported more than 330,000 abortions and a record $1.66 billion revenue. In October, Planned Parenthood announced plans to spend at least $45 million to defeat President Donald Trump and support a pro-abortion candidates in 2020.
A Massachusetts senator, Warren has a 100-percent pro-abortion voting record, including a recent vote against protecting newborns from infanticide.
Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com
On Monday, she touted her abortion advocacy at the Women’s March where she wore her pink scarf for the second time.
“I spoke and I wore my pink Planned Parenthood scarf,” Warren said. “Now that’s two, so here’s my plan for number three: I’m gonna be wearing that scarf when I’m sworn as president of the United States.”
Warren may not get the opportunity, though. Her position on abortion is radical and out of touch with most Americans.
She would force taxpayers to pay for elective abortions, something polls consistently show the public is opposed to. Warren also opposes even modest limits on abortion after viability; most Americans want viable, late-term unborn babies to be protected from abortions.
During the November debate, Warren insisted that killing unborn children in abortions is a “human right.” She falsely claimed that “three out of four” Americans support Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court case that essentially allowed abortions up to birth.
But that is false. A January national poll conducted by Marist University found an overwhelming majority of Americans support restrictions on abortion.According to the poll, three in four Americans (75 percent) say abortion should be limited to – at most – the first three months of pregnancy.
A poll from YouGov/Americans United for Life this fall also found that 70 percent of Americans support abortion limits. Additionally, a 2019 Gallup poll found 60 percent of Americans take a pro-life position on abortion, wanting all (21 percent) or almost all (39 percent) abortions to be illegal. And in May, a Hill/HarrisX poll found that 55 percent of voters said they do not think laws banning abortions after six weeks – when an unborn baby’s heartbeat is detectable – are too restrictive, according to The Hill.
Democrat voters who believe abortions should be limited do not have much of a choice in 2020. All of the top Democrat presidential contenders believe abortions should be legal for any reason up to birth and taxpayer funded.
I know right? I think if she was really brave, she would perform an abortion at her inaugural acceptance speech. That would show everyone how down she is with fighting “oppression of women”.
Delusional.
Brought to you by Carls Junior.
Maybe she can strangle herself with it when it gets caught in the doors of a MTA commuter train.
‘How is abortion considered “health care for women”?’
the current zeitgeist for the pro choice crowd is the unborn child as a ‘parasitic invasion’, that the child is leeching nutrients and other vital essences from the bearer, so as to compromise her well being...this negates the obvious rejoinder to their claim that a woman can do what she wants with her body, to wit, ‘well, sure, but a baby is somebody else’s body...’; this casts the woman as biological prey, and the baby as biological predator, thus requiring medical intervention...that it is to date the only way in which our species can replicate doesn’t seem to enter their calculus at all...
This puts the proper perspective on their whole foolosophy.
Pink scarf? Get bold Warren. Wear the pink pussy hat.
The true aim of PP is “cancelling production health care,” especially for the baby. In short, Murder!
The Mother should agree to her own death at the same time as her baby’s.
When she goes to the Inauguration, in 2021, won’t she feel a little annoyed that it is The Donald and not her on the podium? Will she still wear the scarf?
G.K. Chesterton, from an essay, “I despise Birth Control”:
“I despise Birth-Control first because it is a weak and wobbly and cowardly word. It is also an entirely meaningless word; and is used so as to curry favour even with those who would at first recoil from its real meaning. The proceeding these quack doctors recommend does not control any birth. It only makes sure that there shall never be any birth to control.”
Always better to murder children in the womb, isn’t it Lizzy?
Warren has dropped from 26% to just 14% support according to real Clear politics.
Maybe she will wear accessories to the scarf such as a purse made out of aborted baby skin, or aborted baby skin shoes, or may some novel jewelry constructed out of baby parts ..... she’s such a classy communist.
NO matter what you believe about the legality of abortion, believing it’s something heroic, worth celebrating, shows what a sick sick society we have become.
First you need to become the candidate, Lizzie. 8>)
Eh, what's one more lie? She'll never be inaugurated, unless they inaugurate trash collectors these days.
She should wear it with her liawatha headdress. LMAO!
Just wear it for your booking photo.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.