Posted on 11/30/2019 5:20:16 PM PST by jocon307
Q. What was your initial reaction to the 1619 Project?
A. Well, I didnt know anything about it until I got my Sunday paper, with the magazine section entirely devoted to the 1619 Project. Because this is a subject Ive long been interested in I sat down and started to read some of the essays. Id say that, almost from the outset, I was disturbed by what seemed like a very unbalanced, one-sided account, which lacked context and perspective on the complexity of slavery, which was clearly, obviously, not an exclusively American institution, but existed throughout history. And slavery in the United States was only a small part of a larger world process that unfolded over many centuries. And in the United States, too, there was not only slavery but also an antislavery movement. So I thought the account, which emphasized American racismwhich is obviously a major part of the history, no question about itbut it focused so narrowly on that part of the story that it left most of the history out.
So I read a few of the essays and skimmed the rest, but didnt pursue much more about it because it seemed to me that I wasnt learning very much new. And I was a little bit unhappy with the idea that people who did not have a good knowledge of the subject would be influenced by this and would then have a biased or narrow view.
(Excerpt) Read more at wsws.org ...
And, I guess I'm not sure what to think about this, they don't have a 'share on facebook' thingy, otherwise I would have shared it there.
But, evidently they are more serious minded than that, and so are we, so I shall share it here.
Because it needs to be about.
You wouldn’t get anything close to this published in the NY Times or Washington Post.
The world turned upside-down! A communist paper publishing a balanced article refuting the New York Times’ Communist propaganda..
So, what does this tell you? Who are the “real” commies?
The MSM seems to be a place for totally thoughtless pseudo commies, certainly. But we are not really in an ideologic struggle. We are seeing a power struggle between government mandarins and the citizens of the Republic.
This whole debate is merely grasping a handy stick to beat an opponent — no matter what it means later.
For later
No America Wasn’t Built on slavery but by men of faith.
https://thefederalist.com/2019/08/21/no-america-wasnt-built-slavery-faith-men-created-equal/
This went on for too long so I didn't get to the end but I think McPherson misses a major change brought on by the war, just as he missed it in the introduction to one of his books when he quoted a professor who lived in Cambridge, Massachusetts, writing in 1869, "It is as if I am no longer living in the country in which I was born."
This had nothing to do with the war or slavery as Cambridge was essentially untouched by both. He was talking about our system of government. I once remarked in a class at an Ivy I attended as an adult, "Lincoln destroyed the system of government bequeathed to us by the Framers." After the class I spoke privately with the professor and his comment about my comment was, "Well, he had help."
But it was gone.
ML/NJ
That was a very good linked article about slavery in America. The “1619 Project” is just another attempt by the Left, using “Critical Theory,” to tear down America and convince people that it is not worth saving in its current form. This tactic is part of their overall strategy of “Cultural Marxism” that was started by Antonio Gramscii.
Isn’t it weird? Clearly communism cannot STAND to NOT cover every bit of land it can get its guantleted hand on.
Anyone sane would simply LEAVE the place they hate so much and find greener pasture. But being commies, they instead INSIST on CHANGE to their thinking.
Could you remember from whom that 1869 quote might be? I’d love to know.
Do you mean Gen. James B. Mcpherson, the Union general? I do not believe he is related to James McPherson the author.
Really? I guess it still is "One Nation" technically. I even remember when we really were one nation, united. I also remember hearing and seeing the B-36's flying over my Grandparent's house and the steam driven coal fired trains when the diesels were new. We are very much less a single nation today than we were post WWII / pre-Korean Conflict. I guess that an existential, external national threat causes that attitude.
I believe that the author is descended from the CWII GENERAL.
An unbalanced, one-sided account? Hell, that describes McPherson’s entire career. He’s the chief PC Revisionist.
I was wrong- The author is NOT related to the General-
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
“I am not related to Gen. James Birdseye McPherson. I did have two Civil War ancestors: a great-grandfather, Luther Osborn, who enlisted in the 93rd New York Volunteer Infantry in December 1861, rose to corporal, became a lieutenant in the 22nd U.S. Colored Infantry in January 1864, rose to captain in that regiment; and a great-great-grandfather, Jesse Beecher, who enlisted in the 112th New York Volunteer Infantry in August 1862, rose to sergeant, died of typhoid fever in April 1865, is buried in the National Military Cemetery at Wilmington, North Carolina.”
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
https://www.thedailybeast.com/25-years-of-battle-cry-of-freedom-an-interview-with-james-m-mcpherson
I shall synopsize the excerpt: It’s propaganda.
Had to look for several minutes to find the book where I found it: McPherson's Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution. The preface opens:
Four years after the guns fell silent at Appomattox, Harvard historian George Ticknor reflected on the meaning of the Civil War. That national trauma had riven "a great gulf between what happened before in our century and what has happened since, or what is likely to happen hereafter. It does not seem to me as if I were living in the country in which I was born."An endnote indicates that this quote comes from some other relevantly recent history authored by Morton Keller.
ML/NJ
McPherson said he was and I believe him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.