Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Sued Over Law Requiring Corporations To Adopt Woman Quotas
Reason ^ | November 14, 2019 | CHRISTIAN BRITSCHGI

Posted on 11/15/2019 4:31:09 PM PST by karpov

A new lawsuit is challenging a California law that requires corporations to elect a minimum number of women to their boards of directors.

On Wednesday, the Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) sued California Secretary of State Alex Padilla, the state official in charge of administering SB 826. That law, passed in 2018, requires that, by 2020, all publicly traded companies headquartered or incorporated in California have at least one woman on their board of directors.

Come 2022, companies with five-member boards will need to have at least two female directors. Firms with six or more directors will need at least three women on their board.

Failing to fulfill the law's gender quota or to properly report the composition of their boards to the state can net companies fines of $100,000 for the first violation, and $300,000 for each subsequent violation. Each board position required to be occupied by a woman, but isn't, counts as a separate violation.

The purpose of the law, according to its sponsor, state Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara), is to make the top of the corporate ladder more equal and to improve corporate decision making.

...

The potential constitutional flaws of SB 826 are not news to anyone. Even supporters of the bill have acknowledged that it might not withstand legal challenge.

"There have been numerous objections to this bill, and serious legal concerns have been raised," wrote then-Gov. Jerry Brown in a statement after signing the bill into law. "I don't minimize the potential flaws that indeed may prove fatal to its ultimate implementation."

(Excerpt) Read more at reason.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: California
KEYWORDS: quotas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
So Jerry Brown knew the bill was unconstitutional but signed it anyway? How much time and money have California companies wasted complying with this law?
1 posted on 11/15/2019 4:31:09 PM PST by karpov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: karpov

“All right. Two of youse gotta wear the wig and high heels tonight.”


2 posted on 11/15/2019 4:35:34 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

That’s good. They should be sued about this artificial requirement. This is part of the reason many european countries are now screwed up with laws demanding a certain appearance. Never mind demanding a certain level of competence. Countries such as Norway, Sweden and Denmark.

I still think of that photo from Sweden, showing a dozen men on a social committee, all of them wearing pink pussyhats.


3 posted on 11/15/2019 4:37:05 PM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

“Liberty? What’s that?”


4 posted on 11/15/2019 4:37:37 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Well wait a minute, I thought gender didn’t matter anymore and it could be whatever someone says it is?
The libs better make up their mind.


5 posted on 11/15/2019 4:38:13 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland (I have no incriminating evidence on the Clintons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
Tom and Jerry identify as women during the meetings therefore we are in compliance.
6 posted on 11/15/2019 4:40:40 PM PST by BipolarBob (Bipolars have more fun. No we don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Simple. The board simply needs to draw straws to determine which ones will identify as women.

Done!


7 posted on 11/15/2019 4:41:28 PM PST by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

“You can be on our Board, but you’re going to have to identify as a woman”.

Because ruining women’s sports hasn’t been enough.


8 posted on 11/15/2019 4:41:28 PM PST by ameribbean expat (Socialism is like a nude beach - - sounds great til you actually get there. -- David Burge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov
I like their take on chicken tortilla soup... at least when it is in season.

Simple. Just tell the gov't that a couple of your board members identify as female.

They wouldn't dare question it.

9 posted on 11/15/2019 4:41:48 PM PST by TangoLimaSierra (To the Left, The Truth is Right Wing Extremism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangoLimaSierra
Good grief I pasted from a previous post.
#Dumb bass.
10 posted on 11/15/2019 4:42:58 PM PST by TangoLimaSierra (To the Left, The Truth is Right Wing Extremism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: karpov

What a great idea! High taxes on individuals are forcing labor to leave because they can’t afford housing and now the State wants to make sure their employers leave, too, by taking away their right to manage as they see fit. Brilliant move, Stupid.


11 posted on 11/15/2019 4:44:06 PM PST by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

What does it say about a legislature that knowingly passes an unconstitutional law?


12 posted on 11/15/2019 4:45:15 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov
Just have everyone on the board say they’re non-binary as accepted for California Driver’s Licenses. Then there’s no quota. Easy peasy.
13 posted on 11/15/2019 4:47:33 PM PST by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

No problem. Just say all the male board members “identify” as women.

Problem solved.


14 posted on 11/15/2019 4:51:08 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats only believe in democracy when they win the election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell
That’s good. They should be sued about this artificial requirement. This is part of the reason many european countries are now screwed up with laws demanding a certain appearance. Never mind demanding a certain level of competence. Countries such as Norway, Sweden and Denmark.
I still think of that photo from Sweden, showing a dozen men on a social committee, all of them wearing pink pussyhats.

The entire nonsense of racial diversity ONLY applies here.
In Japan EVERYONE is Japanese = no racial diversity.
In China EVERYONE is Chinese = no racial diversity.
In India EVERYONE is Caucasian = no racial diversity.
In the sub-Saharan countries EVERYONE is black = no racial diversity.

Who were the morons that decided that quotas should fill RACIAL quotas? What about REAL diversity ... of thought and ideas?

Yes, I know, there are exceptions to "EVERYONE."

15 posted on 11/15/2019 4:56:42 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: karpov
And, when WOMEN get pregnant they will be able to take an INFINITE amount of time off, probably with pay.
Not fair. But, then this isn't new, is it?
16 posted on 11/15/2019 4:58:21 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Good


17 posted on 11/15/2019 5:04:37 PM PST by Bigg Red (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat
Because ruining women’s sports hasn’t been enough.

The crux of the problem is that most men want to watch MEN playing sports. They don't care to watch women because women simply don't have the strength to achieve those athletic goals that men can.
Besides, women don't play football or baseball.

And, women don't want to watch other women play sports. I know that I didn't/don't want to.
There are a few women tennis players that I watched.
I watched the Williams sisters because I detested them and wanted to see Serena start losing. I ended up liking Venus because she finally GREW up and was nice.

And, poor Serena, she's losing...and even her white husband Alexis Ohanian [from Google: Alexis Kerry Ohanian, also known by the username kn0thing, is an American Internet entrepreneur and investor. He is best known as the co-founder and executive chairman of the social news website Reddit.] can't make Serena 25 years old again.
So it gave me great satisfaction to see that big, nasty, old cow LOSE.

But watch women's golf? YAWN.

I do play golf...or a reasonable facsimile thereof. My husband was the golfer.

18 posted on 11/15/2019 5:11:36 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Wh would do business in California anyway?


19 posted on 11/15/2019 5:15:16 PM PST by Brilliant (David E. Peterson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangoLimaSierra

Not only do they identify as women, but identify as black Hispanic physically challenged women.


20 posted on 11/15/2019 5:25:48 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson