Skip to comments.
The most destructive hurricanes are hitting the U.S. more often
AP via NBC ^
| 11 11 2019
| Staff
Posted on 11/11/2019 6:05:17 PM PST by yesthatjallen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
A Danish research team came up with a new measurement that looked at just the how big and strong the hurricane was When you're losing the game, change the rules.
Now the global warming alarmists have come up with a new fungible metric. Area of Total Destruction.
Now they can go to hurricane records before satellites and estimate previous hurricanes used to be smaller.
To: yesthatjallen
When I want to know about snow, I’ll ask a Dane. Otherwise, STFU!
2
posted on
11/11/2019 6:08:03 PM PST
by
RedMonqey
To: yesthatjallen
Just like the rat congress - when the facts don’t exist, make them up.
3
posted on
11/11/2019 6:08:44 PM PST
by
Some Fat Guy in L.A.
(Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
To: yesthatjallen
As we witness record cold bearing down on the Midwest we subjected to this kind of global warming BS being reported as fact. Orwell really underestimated how bad things would be.
4
posted on
11/11/2019 6:09:34 PM PST
by
gibsonguy
To: yesthatjallen
Even the “cost” measurement overstates: there is more to be damaged.
Maybe if it was adjusted for GDP.
5
posted on
11/11/2019 6:10:21 PM PST
by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: yesthatjallen
"Now they can go to hurricane records before satellites and estimate previous hurricanes used to be smaller."
I'm sure they calculated the big storms that went undetected, outside the shipping lanes and never made landfall...(/sarc)
6
posted on
11/11/2019 6:10:45 PM PST
by
RedMonqey
To: yesthatjallen
No they aren’t. We really seem to be getting fewer hurricanes. It is the media hype before one that is overkill and hyper.
7
posted on
11/11/2019 6:11:13 PM PST
by
dforest
(Just shut up Obama. Maybe everyone should just shut up. Particularly Mutt Romney)
To: yesthatjallen
Destructive hurricanes hitting the US have been down for decades.
8
posted on
11/11/2019 6:12:30 PM PST
by
Williams
(Stop Tolerating The Intolerant.)
To: yesthatjallen
“Experts generally measure a hurricanes destruction by adding up how much damage it did to people and cities”
As the coasts build up there is more destruction.
9
posted on
11/11/2019 6:13:10 PM PST
by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(If you want a definition of "bullying" just watch the Democrats in the Senate)
To: yesthatjallen
Ive researched it and proclaim due to the lack of Danish hurricanes, climate change will make us all happy and rich. Shoot, Im just as credible as those guys.
To: Some Fat Guy in L.A.
Yep! First it was " hair on fire", RECESSION and now it's hurricanes! 😱 I swear these bastards don't have lives!
To: yesthatjallen
A little over a year ago, a Cat 5 hit just East of Panama City. Michael was the most powerful one to hit the Florida Panhandle since records have been kept.
That statistically means absolutely nothing
12
posted on
11/11/2019 6:18:14 PM PST
by
yarddog
( For I am persuaded.)
To: yesthatjallen
Very scientific. </sarcasm>
13
posted on
11/11/2019 6:18:27 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Democrats only believe in democracy when they win the election.)
To: yesthatjallen
Jehovah Witnesses believe in the same crapola.
To: yesthatjallen
Why go to a Dane when we already have a Swedish teenager?
15
posted on
11/11/2019 6:19:53 PM PST
by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: yesthatjallen
If they would just ban SUV’s and air conditioners, hurricanes would cease.
16
posted on
11/11/2019 6:20:12 PM PST
by
Rennes Templar
(Heaven has a wall and gates. Hell has open borders.)
To: yesthatjallen
It is an interesting postulate. Has the US territory in the study changed? So are we comparing area to area and there is just some feature of the USA that make bigger storms? With out data and something new I cannot get into this idea.
17
posted on
11/11/2019 6:20:54 PM PST
by
KC_for_Freedom
(retired aerospace engineer and CSP who also taught)
To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
I have noticed that the most severe weather tends to follow the MSM forecasts of severe weather.
18
posted on
11/11/2019 6:21:59 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: yesthatjallen
Now they can go to hurricane records before satellites and estimate previous hurricanes used to be smaller. Yes, we must apply "correction factors" to all previous weather events, just as we have "corrected" previous temperature and sea level data. Control the data and you control the argument.
19
posted on
11/11/2019 6:22:50 PM PST
by
ETCM
To: yesthatjallen
A Dane?
20
posted on
11/11/2019 6:23:28 PM PST
by
TADSLOS
(You know why you can enjoy a day at the Zoo? Because walls work.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson