Plus he hurt their feelings...
They’re going to need some nouns and verbs.
What does the number mean?
What’s the difference between 1 or 10?
Are they saying three different crimes were committed?
A##holes.
thanks ahead of time.
Predicted by many quite some time ago, and most were ridiculed for thinking it. Just because people thinks it’s stupid doesn’t mean it won’t happen. And while conviction remains a bit of a long-shot (GOP Senate does not give me a warm fuzzy here), that was never the must-have. It was to neuter Trump and re-take Congress. They’ve done that with the House, and the Senate is next.
I have nothing but contempt for that bunch of pr!cks myself.
If contempt of congress was a crime, the vast majority of the country would need to be in jail.
DO IT.
Drum roll please for the demonrats bull spit “charges” once again proving that a grand jury can indict a ham sammich.
Impeachable offense is anything they want it to be I guess.
Three pieces of $hit.
3 or 100 it doesn’t matter, nothing will come up it.
4th article is just because “orange man bad!”
ROFL
Prediction: Democrat “Impeachment Articles” will just happen to magicly match the criminal referrals in the IG report. Any takers???
No, no, you heard us all wrong, one of the representatives’ little kids were demanding ice cream, and we’re sending out for the imp’s peach mint.
It may take until early next year, but when the Left's whacked-out base stumbles out of their stupor and realizes what the Democrat/Left Party has again done to them ... well ... that's when the fun really begins!
Democrats Consider Three Articles of Impeachment before Barr has all Hell break loose ,LOL
I read a book like this a long time ago entitled: “Jokes for the John”.
The blower got his info told to him through 3 different people of whom the first claims he got the info from DJT, the other guy testifying is testifying about his opinion of a story written in the NYT.
So obviously the seriousness of the charge (since there is absolutely no evidence of any kind) is the basis of the impeachment articles and DJT will have to prove a negative if it comes to a Senate trial. This is all a political theater without any actual evidence of any sort and while this is in the House (with absolute powers), DJT will be denied any sort of rebuttal, lawyer, or questioning.
If contempt of congress is wrong I don’t want to be right.
Is butt-hurt an impeachable offense?
First of all, this Congress is contemptible so nothing there.
Second, obstruction of justice as applied by a Star Chamber is a patriotic duty so nothing there.
That just leaves abuse of power, and I read nothing abusive in the transcript.
It’s time to move on.