To: NewJerseyJoe
Personally, I don't think Ciaramella is the real "whistleblower" at all -- and we're being taken for a ride through a major misdirection play by the Democrats.
In fact, I don't think there really is ONE "whistleblower" at all -- but a group of 4-6 people (or more) who could be credibly brought forward by Adam Schiff as "the whistleblower" if the situation required it.
9 posted on
11/07/2019 6:32:34 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")
To: Alberta's Child
To: Alberta's Child
To: Alberta's Child
That fits what I was going to propose as option 3: The Dems deliberately left that one unredacted name buried deep on the transcript as a red herring.
To: Alberta's Child
Personally, I don't think Ciaramella is the real "whistleblower" at all --
and we're being taken for a ride through a major misdirection play by the Democrats.
In fact, I don't think there really is ONE "whistleblower" at all -- but a group of 4-6 people (or more) who could be credibly brought forward by Adam Schiff as "the whistleblower"if the situation required it
sounds right to me...
To: Alberta's Child
I think it might be worse than that.
The intelligence agencies are running a psyops on U.S. citizen’s.
There is a war room somewhere where “operation impeachment” is coordinated across a broad range of assets.
Hollywood
Media
Congress
Foreign assets
...to create this dangerous effort to remove Trump and save themselves from prison or worse.
45 posted on
11/07/2019 7:33:53 AM PST by
Eddie01
(My very first mistake in life was believing that life was fair.)
To: Alberta's Child
Probably... if so they planned his debut as far back as Jan 2017.
54 posted on
11/07/2019 8:06:49 AM PST by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: Alberta's Child
“...we’re being taken for a ride through a major misdirection play...”
Very interesting thought. We know Ciaramella is a leaker, it is why he was sent back to Langley. But do we know the WB?...I would think Jordan or another Republican actually in the SCIF testimony hearings would be able to key in allies if indeed there was misdirection play occurring.
To: Alberta's Child
He’s already said that.
He’s already said they don’t need the original whistle blower’s statements at all.
I don’t know how everyone forgot that.
But Rs must hit schiff for meeting with him BEFORE he went to the proper channels.
They must make this look as illegitimate as it is
77 posted on
11/07/2019 10:19:26 AM PST by
dp0622
(Radicals, racists Don't point fingers at me I'm a small town white boy Just tryin' to make ends meet)
To: Alberta's Child; NewJerseyJoe
Personally, I don't think Ciaramella is the real "whistleblower" at all -- and we're being taken for a ride through a major misdirection play by the Democrats. Bump
101 posted on
11/07/2019 5:04:19 PM PST by
Doofer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson