Answer: Miss Trial
Posted on 11/05/2019 5:46:17 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
At the beginning of jury selection, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson, an Obama appointee, said that she would not remove potential jurors solely on the basis that they work for the federal government or because of their views of Trump.
That position was tested at the very start of jury selection at Stone’s trial, which recessed early after the longtime political operative fell ill.
The potential juror served as a press secretary in the Office of Management and Budget during the Obama administration, according to Politico and Reuters. She also admitted to having a negative view of Trump.
The potential juror’s husband also currently works in the Justice Department’s national security division, which was involved in the investigation of the Trump campaign and other Trump associates, including Stone.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
A few plants help. My guess.....they’re ALL plants.
A kangaroo court is a court that ignores recognized standards of law or justice, and often carries little or no official standing in the territory within which it resides.
The term may also apply to a court held by a legitimate judicial authority who intentionally disregards the court’s legal or ethical obligations.
The deck is stacked against any Republican facing trial. Political partisans should always be excluded from a jury.
If one juror votes not guilty and does not cave, does it go to mistrial or acquittal?
How can you have a juror whose spouse was investigating STone. Unbelievable
That depends on what the judge had for breakfast. Total judge call there. Judges like guilty verdicts. They do not like not-guilty verdicts.
Rigged trial. Appeal should find the judge unfit for duty and have her disbarred.
I hope this judge is prepared to have their conduct scrutinized at every level of appeal.
Evil people are often stupid.
One more slip on the Banana Republic peel.
Amy Berman Jackson Can rot her sorry ass in ....... never mind.
Well, there’s his appeal if he needs it.
The judge doesn’t care if it gets reversed because that will happen after the 2020 election.
The only goal is to take scalps of Trump associates to play the guilty-by-association card on him.
Answer: Miss Trial
Mis-trial
That would leave it up to Stone's lawyer to challenge those jurors. - Tom
Ha! Love it.
Verdict first, trial later. Classic leftist nonsense.
roger stone is a trip. Now he has food poisoning
What are the restrictions on the prosecutors? Are they able to remove pro-Trump jurors?
If the prosecutors are allowed to remove pro Trump jurors while the defense cannot remove anti-Trump jurors then it is rigged.
The same rules need to be equally enforced.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.