I will judge the process by its parallels to “Alice in Wonderland”, “1984”, and “Animal Farm”. So far it's a screaming success.
But, here's the one line in his article that sums up his agenda. You're not going to believe what he writes. Ready?
"Congressional Republicans should be careful what they ask for. Their defense of the president has addressed process, not proof. The proof is largely undisputed, except by the president himself. It consists of admissions, testimony and documents, which show that Trump sought to induce the government of Ukraine to become involved in the 2020 presidential election.
Specifically, Trump held up $391 million in American military hardware and financial aid to Ukraine – which is at war with Russia after the Russian seizure and continual occupation of what was until 2014 a Ukrainian province – until Ukrainian prosecutors commenced a criminal investigation of former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter."
I can't believe, that this guy is/was a judge, and secondly they keep him on this station. You ever notice that he seldom appears on Tucker, Laura or Hannity? The man is a joke, and this article is also
I’ll judge it on whatever the Hell I choose to judge it on, “Judge”.
I make up the rules for me, not you.
The fat pole smoker should have left with Shemp. I have no use for this Trump hater.
Which Law (of the super-multitude that there are) did The Donald break?
How do you judge on merits when they won’t let you see the witnesses or the evidence?
Why are Democrats hiding evidence from the American public?
They are just re-working the old bogus "it's about the seriousness of the charge".
When only one side can ask questions and other side is allowed to doctor the answers, this is not bipartisan, nor legal... "judge".
I can’t stand this guy. Glad he unwittingly helped get rid of Shemp
I will judge the process by its parallels to “Alice in Wonderland”, “1984”, and “Animal Farm”. So far it's a screaming success.
Can we just ignore Fudge Nappy?
He’s never right about ANYTHING.
It has no merits ...
Laughable contention. It is not to facilitate candor, it is to firm up the concocted story, strengthen the witness by preparing him for future hostile questioning, and to gather quotes that can be selectively leaked to influence public opinion.
And this lying asshat knows exactly what the closed hearings are all about.
I believe the expression “TURNCOAT” fits here!
[Judge Napolitano]
Shut up, Napolitano, you Shep Smith Eddie Munster poofter.
We judged you on your merits.
Could not agree more with your analysis.
I thought Judge N. had been sincere all these years. I now realize he’s only been in it to promote himself.
I’d love to see this abomination stripped of his “Judge” title. POS that he is.
This guy has become a real clown. He used to be okay but it seems that the deep state totally cowed him after he said the Brits were helping the fed to circumvent rules about spying on US citizens (which they were) and was made to apologize and grovel. They let him know who really owns him and he’s been towing the deep state line ever since.
Why have “process” when mob rule will suffice.