Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Graham Proposed Senate Resolution relating to House Persecution Process
Lindsey Graham ^ | October 24, 2019 | Lindsey Graham

Posted on 10/24/2019 12:58:18 PM PDT by Cboldt

Bunch of "whereas" followed by:

Resolved, That the Senate--

(1) calls on the House of Representatives, prior to proceeding any further with its impeachment in- vestigation into President Trump, to vote to initiate a formal impeachment inquiry;

(2) calls on the House of Representatives to provide President Trump, like every other American, with due process, to include the ability to confront his accusers, call witnesses on his behalf, and have a basic understanding of the accusations against him that would form any basis for impeachment; and

(3) calls on the House of Representatives to provide members of the minority with the ability to participate fully in all proceedings and have equal authority to issue subpoenas and other compulsory process.

(Excerpt) Read more at judiciary.senate.gov ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: graham; ukrainegate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last
To: MNJohnnie

Takes 34 votes to acquit.


61 posted on 10/24/2019 1:46:42 PM PDT by tirednvirginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Not disagreeing that Atkinson needs to go, just that the exact reason is one of stepping outside of his lane, not one of taking crap evidence and advancing it.


Sunlight is the best disinfectant. Shine the bright lights of a Senate committee hearing on these cockroach coupists and they will crawl back under their Deep State rocks. Graham knows that. Instead, he is choosing for whatever reason to enable the House Dems and their Deep State coup operatives.


62 posted on 10/24/2019 1:54:28 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

linda, it has continued since you made that threat two weeks ago. Where are you?


Lyin’ Lindsay is a total fraud. Tucker played tape of him promising in January to “get to the bottom” of the FBI raid on Roger Stone. Never followed up. Graham threatened Comey in May. Nothing there, too. Really, how stupid does Graham think GOP voters are?


63 posted on 10/24/2019 1:56:07 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
“I’ll take a look at that, " Romney said. “I’d like to see a vote taken in the House to see if there’s support for an impeachment process.

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/24/republicans-vote-condemn-house-impeachment-inquiry-056550

64 posted on 10/24/2019 1:56:11 PM PDT by Fido969 (In!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

That means there are 17 votes to convict. They need three more.


65 posted on 10/24/2019 1:56:28 PM PDT by Jim Noble (There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

FWIW, good defense attorney is not going to start arguing their defense until the prosecution has presented their complaint. There are a lot of reasons for this but chief among the reasons is that the defense does not want the prosecution aware of their own weaknesses. For example, what if the prosecutors in the OJ Simpson case were made aware that the defense was going to prove the glove did not fit?

Patience and let the process play out.


66 posted on 10/24/2019 1:56:37 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Impeachment is Built on a Trap That Obama Created for Romney
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2019/10/impeachment-built-trap-obama-created-romney-daniel-greenfield/


67 posted on 10/24/2019 1:57:14 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
That means there are 17 votes to convict

No, it means there are 17 that want to see which way the wind is blowing and possibly see if they can get something in return for their votes.

68 posted on 10/24/2019 1:58:25 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: lodi90
-- Sunlight is the best disinfectant. Shine the bright lights of a Senate committee hearing on these cockroach coupists and they will crawl back under their Deep State rocks. Graham knows that. --

Yes, he does. That Atkinison was out of his lane (out of jurisdiction) is perfectly known to Graham. Graham instead is captive to the deep state / press operation that advances falsehood.

And when FISA abuse comes out, all he will do is try to finger a fall guy or two, and advance more laws - and he'll proclaim the issue is behind us, government is now cleansed, this can never happen again.

Total enabler of globalism. I detest the man.

69 posted on 10/24/2019 1:58:25 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Graham said he has 41 cosigners and growing at his press conference.


70 posted on 10/24/2019 2:01:15 PM PDT by TexasCruzin (Trump is the man. #TrumpPence16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

Little Marco and girlie man Cory Gardner both need to be primaried .


71 posted on 10/24/2019 2:01:43 PM PDT by Colo9250
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
-- FWIW, good defense attorney is not going to start arguing their defense until the prosecution has presented their complaint. --

Yeah, well, that's when the prosecutor has asemblance of ethics. See Waco biker cases for a counterexample. Obviously innocent people ruined because the prosecutor could, and wanted to. Eventually, charges dropped.

I suppose you are okay-fine that Mueller had free reign? No sweat that baseless accusations are made the prominent publicity relating to Trump? Just let the process play out?

The number of false allegations that can be floated is adequate to preoccupy the presidency for its duration. And after, well, just drop it, and there, the process has played out.

72 posted on 10/24/2019 2:04:17 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Why don’t the Senate Republicans simply start their own investigative hearings, calling the same witnesses, and put them on television?


73 posted on 10/24/2019 2:05:03 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("The rat always knows when he's in with weasels."--Tom Waits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Tough guy? These resolutions don’t mean a hill of beans. One senator can put it up for a vote and one can close it down. He knows. People on this website should know this. He is major swamp, thats why he’s the Chairman. Nothing will get done.


74 posted on 10/24/2019 2:06:14 PM PDT by ivory49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
I figure the resolution will get an hour or two of debate in the Senate, and then it dies. GOP objections will be "stay in our lane," let the House run its business however it sees fit. If the Senate gripes about the House, it means the House can gripe about the Senate.

Intramural quibbles are no way to fool the public into thinking it has a functioning government.

75 posted on 10/24/2019 2:08:01 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

So when did Linda say hearings would start?
Please be specific as to the date Linda said hearings would start.
Those here who continue to support Linda, only enable him
to break his promises to the rest of us.


76 posted on 10/24/2019 2:08:47 PM PDT by tennmountainman (The Liberals Are Baby Killers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
-- Please be specific as to the date Linda said hearings would start. --

He's never given a date, only said that the Horowitz report into "FISA abuse" would trigger hearings.

Lindsey Graham: Horowitz will offer Senate 'chilling testimony' on FISA abuse
by Jerry Dunleavy
The Washington Examiner Magazine, Digital Edition
August 21, 2019

Graham confirmed the widely expected hearing on the "Wake Up Carolina!" radio show with Ken Ard earlier this morning. Graham said he'd call for Horowitz to explain his report to the American public in an open session, though he did not specify exactly when it might happen.

"He will come to the committee to testify -- the chairman -- and we'll make sure he gets all the time he needs to tell the country what happened," Graham said. "He will be in public. We want to do all of it that we can in the open. We don't want to have a classified session unless we have to."

The eventual ramifications will be naming a fall guy or three, and passing more pointless laws.

The real unelected government will remain in power (in fact, be made more powerful), and the elected puppets will carry on, laughing at the gullible public.

77 posted on 10/24/2019 2:14:58 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
Why don’t the Senate Republicans simply start their own investigative hearings, calling the same witnesses, and put them on television?

That's one option. Another plan would be for the Senate to wait and see if the morons in the House actually do anything. Chances are good they will never even schedule a vote to impeach. But if they do - Sentate Republicans should immediately vote to decline the remove of the President.

Either way - Trump wins.

 

78 posted on 10/24/2019 2:18:38 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Graham worthless piece of shi! that the communists Democrats just laugh. Senate Republicans are the do nothing jackasses that have to protect their past.
79 posted on 10/24/2019 2:19:02 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
possibly see if they can get something in return for their votes.

Everything the Deep State has, all of its resources - girls, boys, money, K Street, threesomes, drugs, nondisclosure of Epstein material - all of it will be available to get to 19.

Count on it

80 posted on 10/24/2019 2:20:31 PM PDT by Jim Noble (There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson