FWIW, good defense attorney is not going to start arguing their defense until the prosecution has presented their complaint. There are a lot of reasons for this but chief among the reasons is that the defense does not want the prosecution aware of their own weaknesses. For example, what if the prosecutors in the OJ Simpson case were made aware that the defense was going to prove the glove did not fit?
Patience and let the process play out.
Yeah, well, that's when the prosecutor has asemblance of ethics. See Waco biker cases for a counterexample. Obviously innocent people ruined because the prosecutor could, and wanted to. Eventually, charges dropped.
I suppose you are okay-fine that Mueller had free reign? No sweat that baseless accusations are made the prominent publicity relating to Trump? Just let the process play out?
The number of false allegations that can be floated is adequate to preoccupy the presidency for its duration. And after, well, just drop it, and there, the process has played out.
FWIW, good defense attorney is not going to start arguing their defense until the prosecution has presented their complaint.
The court here is public opinion. The best strategy here always offense. Attack the coupists before they have a chance to gaslight their narrative in the media and pivot in whatever direction they choose.