Posted on 10/19/2019 10:24:20 AM PDT by rintintin
There are fresh battles lines in the 2020 presidential campaign, reflecting an unpredictable rivalry between two Democratic politicians one who isnt even running this cycle and another who is polling at barely 1 percent.
Hillary Clinton suggested this week that current primary contender Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii is being used by the Russians, ...
(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...
“why is Hillary paying attention to her?”
Because Tulsi is saner than Warren, Sanders and more mentally fit than Biden.
“Hillary is growing paler and paler.”
This is October.
Freddy often returns just before Halloween.
October is the witches’ favorite month.
Rules area rules. If you post an article ya gotta have pictures.
Oh my. Can you imagine if Bill suddenly started dating Tulsi gabbard? That would unquestionably be the most funny, insane story of 2019. If you think about it, Trump should consider surreptitiously creating and spreading that rumor, and then accusing the Democrats of going for a conspiracy theories when they react with predictable outrage. That scenario would be the funniest thing in the known universe.
Because she is the stupidest and most inept politician who ever lived.
If Tulsi is really polling at barely 1 percent, why is Hillary paying attention to her?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I think people fell asleep during the Dem debates, the powers that be realized that the dems are interested in electing....no one running. So to get some drama, they have Gabbard “take on” Clinton. Finally people are awake, some are screaming “girl fight”. Now if these two were to debate on TV, people would watch just for the hair pulling.
Hillary wants to run and is picking on someone “easy” to get herself back in the public eye. Didn’t work out well for her, as usual.
Agree, and commented similar below before seeing yours. You are on the right track in my view. Hillary would look bad going after a front-runner, so she picks on someone in the public eye but not a threat for the nomination.
I have a feeling both Andrew Yang and Tulsi Gabbard may do somewhat better than the ‘polls’ expect. Provided that the primary ballots are not RIGGED. I’ve personally seen more “YangGang” bumper stickers and signs here in L.A. and Sanders is a close second. California is an important primary state for the Dems if I’m not mistaken.
That being said, I do not ultimately support or appreciate either of them politically on their own merits in the least and hope they don’t ultimately sabotage Trump with swing voters/moderates. (One wonders, given the Tulsi fan club on FR — who even Freepers would pick if there ever were a farfetched Trump vs. Tulsi race.)
Don’t know if either Tulsi or Yang would be “VP” material for someone else? Who knows.
Anything can happen, but:
TRUMP 2020!
“not a declared candidate’
Yet.
Well if Tulsi were polling badly before, Hillary just may have turned her into a frontrunner LoL.
Rules area rules. If you post an article ya gotta have pictures. ................................ Looks like an enhanced photo? Being in the Army these days can build you up in places free in any part of the 54 genders?
I believe you're right...She may be a democrat...but shes not part of the “Deep State Swamp”....and anybody that's not part of the swamp...is a huge threat to all of them!!!!!!!
They'd sooner trust a Deep State Republican.....its like the Mafia...
Yes I get that she is the most attractive (physically and politically) candidate among the Dems -- but given some of the Freeper love she gets, one wonders how some even on these forums may vote in a farfetched Tulsi vs. Trump matchup!
mm hmm!
NOT COOL! Yang and Tulsi may ultimately sabotage Trump among libertarian/moderate/ and swing voters.
(But provided neither of them become the nominee or VP candidate, they can only help Trump as they expose the farce the Democratic Party really is.)
From the piece...
Gabbard, in a scathing response, called Clinton the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long.
Which is a good response, however she might have mentioned her apparent psychoses.
Oh, and to your image, Gabbard might have complimented Hillary on how Hillary puts the "MOO" in muumuu.
.
That’s certainly not her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.