[CondoleezzaProtege]

But Gabbard is also a hypocrite. She’s called for Trump being investigated for the same Clinton/DNC Russia dossier bullshit that Clinton and the Democratic establishment are now pointing at her

Yes I get that she is the most attractive (physically and politically) candidate among the Dems -- but given some of the Freeper love she gets, one wonders how some even on these forums may vote in a farfetched Tulsi vs. Trump matchup!

mm hmm!

NOT COOL! Yang and Tulsi may ultimately sabotage Trump among libertarian/moderate/ and swing voters.

(But provided neither of them become the nominee or VP candidate, they can only help Trump as they expose the farce the Democratic Party really is.)

[EEGator]

“...but given some of the Freeper love she gets, one wonders how some even on these forums may vote in a farfetched Tulsi vs. Trump matchup!”

Your point is ridiculous, and bold doesn’t make it meaningful.

[JBW1949]

“...but given some of the Freeper love she gets, one wonders how some even on these forums may vote in a farfetched Tulsi vs. Trump matchup!...”

No question...........TRUMP!!!!!!!!!

[Notthereyet]

“But Gabbard is also a hypocrite.”
_____________________________________

My bias is going to show:

Gabbard is a Democrat: It automatically puts her in the Hypocrite column.

This is a bias that I won’t retreat from in any set or form.