Posted on 10/17/2019 11:24:45 AM PDT by Kaslin
There is growing and bipartisan alarm among Americans about the “bad acts” of Big Tech companies. For far too long, Big Tech has gotten away with profiting from human trafficking, revenge-porn, the opioid epidemic and drug addiction, terrorism, and other forms of human misery, while engaging in egregious business practices like snooping, spying, political bias against conservatives, employee abuses, and anticompetitive conduct.
Big Tech has engaged in this deplorable conduct largely free from any real oversight from Republicans or Democrats in Washington. That’s not surprising, especially if you understand the ways of the DC Swamp. Big Tech is “feeding chickens” — in the form of political contributions, cushy jobs and consulting gigs, and the like — to satiate the out-of-touch Ruling Class of the DC Swamp. Just like Big Tech Obama Democrats, Corporate Republicans take these handouts from liberal Silicon Valley executives, while taking potshots at principled Republicans and Democrats who dare to raise concerns about the Big Tech bullies. The DC Swamp is the only place on the planet where the reptiles lack backbones.
Fortunately, bold and courageous conservatives and populist progressives are stepping up on behalf of the American people in the fight against Big Tech. This includes new U.S. Senators Josh Hawley (R-MO) and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), joining a bipartisan chorus of 51 attorneys general from across the United States.
We recently launched the Internet Accountability Project (IAP) with the goal of supporting bold, principled leaders who have the courage to stand up to Big Tech’s bad acts, hold them accountable, and give a voice to real Americans — especially grassroots conservatives — throughout the country.
Since our launch just a few weeks ago, we have already heard from many conservatives across America who have shared their stories of Big Tech censorship and their growing concerns about Big Tech, especially Google, Facebook and Amazon, taking more control of their data and eroding privacy rights.
Enough is enough. It’s time to re-boot Big Tech, upgrade and reform the sweetheart laws that protect them, and enforce the antitrust, consumer protection, and similar laws already on the books.
Enforce Our Antitrust Laws
We are pleased that the bipartisan 51 state attorneys general, along with a bipartisan group of lawmakers on the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, recently took the bold and courageous steps of investigating Big Tech under the antitrust laws. As conservatives, we should support law enforcement. A free market requires a functioning market, so we should praise government officials in their efforts to investigate and hold Big Tech accountable. Conservatives should not shy away from these antitrust investigations; we should support vigorous enforcement. After all, antitrust law enforcement is the great American solution to the problem of undue political and market power. Rather than impose regulations on every company in a sector using a regulatory hammer, antitrust law enforcement uses a scalpel and goes after only those companies that are harming markets. As conservatives, we believe that antitrust law enforcement is a better approach to take than heavy-handed regulation. We now have a populist Republican back in the White House, making it an opportune time for antitrust law enforcement to return to its roots and for antitrust law enforcers to rein in Big Tech. It is time for today’s Republicans to take on Big Tech using antitrust law enforcement, just like Republican trustbusters like President Teddy Roosevelt did before them.
Upgrade Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996
Beyond antitrust, conservatives should also look to modernize Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. Section 230 was a well-intentioned piece of legislation back in 1996 when enacted. It was intended to protect Internet start-ups from being wiped out by defamation suits for content posted by users online. The big idea underpinning Section 230 was that the internet would be a thriving marketplace: competition online would be fierce because entry barriers for new websites were very low. In 1996, Congress believed that Section 230 was needed in order to protect nascent Internet companies. Of course, today’s Internet is nothing like the Internet lawmakers envisioned back in 1996 when they passed Section 230 into law. Fast forward to 2019 and instead of robust competition, for many people Google, Facebook, and Amazon are not just websites, they are the Internet. And they are no longer simply online chat rooms; when they censor conservatives, they are publishers of content. They should not be permitted to hold sway over our economy and our political discourse because they are protected from liability for their actions by Section 230. Instead, conservatives should see Section 230 for what it really is: a government subsidy to rich and powerful liberal corporations. Modernizing Section 230 to eliminate this government subsidy and make the platforms more accountable for their actions would be a good step in the right direction for conservatives.
Personal Data = Personal Property
Conservatives should also support the idea of data as a property right. Every year, and largely without our understanding, Big Tech makes hundreds of billions of dollars by harvesting our personal data. We are just beginning to comprehend the enormous cost in our loss of privacy for “free” social-media accounts, email addresses, and Internet searches. Creating a robust and interoperable market for data is a free-market solution to Big Tech’s dominance that would compensate and empower consumers, it would also foster marketplace competition and innovation by allowing consumers to decide which services get their business and which services do not.
What This All Means To Conservatives
As conservatives, we don’t want to see any economic activity over-regulated. Fundamentally, we’re advocating for the end to the “free ride” Big Tech has enjoyed over the last 25 years. These companies have abused their power and influence over our economy, our democracy, and our lives. It is important that conservatives join the movement to protect Americans from Big Tech’s unfettered political power, especially given that these companies have made no secret of their disdain for the president, the conservative movement, and the Republican Party, all while bowing to the whims of Beijing. The time is now for principled conservatives to join Senators Hawley and Blackburn and step up for the American people before it is too late. It is time to hold Big Tech accountable for their bad acts.
Big Tech almost got away with stealing the 2016 election. Google alone accounted for a 10 percent polling advantage for Hillary.
In 2020? They won’t fail. Google, Twitter, Amazon and Facebook will ensure a Rat Victory.
Unless action is taken NOW to regulate these e-Industry monopolies.
Isn’t Big tech hearing Elizabeth Warrens threats ?
Big tech would protect their money 1st one would think
Section 230 should be retained.
Our host Jim Robinson needs to be able to enjoy his life and to not have to worry about lawsuits.
The European Union knows how to deal with out-of-line giant businesses. And so do many American entrepreneurs.
I prefer market-based accountability over government-based accountability.
Beware of what you ask for because you may get it.
I agree these giant companies are evil but who is going to regulate them? The government? The government is 90 percent leftists. Leftists are not going to regulate themselves.
“Big Tech makes hundreds of billions of dollars by harvesting our personal data.”
And many Americans like me “love” Europe, which has certain rules about personal data.
Global players must play by EU rules.
First, take away the H-1B visa cookie jar.
Yes, but...
When market-based accountability overtakes government-based accountability and openly defies our rights and freedoms, then what?
For example, Twitter will not allow me to re-tweet a tweet from President Trump. OK, I’ll use Gab. No wait. Market forces have neutered Gab. No web hosts.
I guess my freedom of speech in the open marketplace is gone. And the government won’t do anything about it.
All of the Presidents largest 2016 support has been banned.
Why is copyright such a big deal when our own personal information isn’t?
REPEAL 230! Everything else will take care of itself.
47 USC § 230: “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider”
Destroy them.
I have been banned from Facebook Messenger because I write to my Viet contacts in Vietnamese. I get banned for three days when I post on FB in Viet. I don’t know what Skype has to do with it but I have become unable to use it.
?
The only genuinely conservative idea in the article. 230 currently treats web platforms as common carriers - (c)(1) - while allowing them to act as publishers - (c)(2). Make them choose: either allow all content, or be responsible for all content.
Yeah what happens when some POS is President? What would Obama have done with such powers?
Kind of generalizing “Big Tech” - once the spittoon of government control tips over, it tends to flow out and over everything in its path as a continuous slimy strand that never seems to have a logical end. It’s “The Blob” on steroids.
What's next? The gubbmint forcing MS to push spyware onto our PC's?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.