Posted on 10/15/2019 11:18:11 AM PDT by SpeedyInTexas
President Donald Trump looks likely to cruise to re-election next year under three different economic models Moodys Analytics employed to gauge the 2020 race.
Barring anything unusual happening, the presidents Electoral College victory could easily surpass his 2016 win over Democrat Hillary Clinton, which came by a 304-227 count.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...
RE: according to Moodys accurate election model
What is their track record for the past elections in this century?
At the link it says:
“The Moodys models have been backtested to 1980 and were correct each time except in 2016, when it indicated Clinton would win a narrow victory.”
Ooops
He’ll win, but the war will be hard. Take what they did in 2016, what they did to Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. The “Russia investigation,” The “Ukraine investigation,” and multiply it by 5 and you have the 2020 campaign.
There will be riots in the streets. Leftists will burn buildings and march. Insane individuals will wail at the moon. The media will invent things late in the game, too late to be proven. There will be outright lies.
Duh.....
Short of a complete economic collapse before next November, or some other black swan event of that magnitude, Trump will win handily.
Best case for Dems, and this is absolute best case is about 15 states plus DC... reality is, depending on who they nominate, they may not even get double digits.
Id like to see him add Nevada, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Virginia and Colorado. Well get a feel on Virginia next month.
Did they factor in margin of fraud?
That’s because the left has lost their mind and it shows. They almost make Hillary look sane
What accurate election model. There wasn’t a single 1 in 2016.
We need the house back. I dont care if its 5 seats. Enough of the crap they are doing. I wanted so badly for the house to stay in republican hands deserved of not. I knew this very thing would happen.
The Dimms and their Resistance idiots have forgotten how powerful incumbency is for the POTUS. The fact that there were only three one-term presidents in the last 100 years says a lot.
Is that real money?
The electoral college adds an additional dimension of complexity to the matrix. But you would have thought that they would have accounted for this.
The dems know this; that’s why they’re desperate to talk the economy down.
It is literally next to impossible for an economy to be either talked up or talked down. This doesn’t mean statements and “jawboning” can’t cause the markets to react, we know that can happen but to actually turn a failing economy up or a soaring economy down.
But But according to Fox News Trump’s poll numbers are in the toilet
Absolutely correct.
That was how Hubert Humphrey campaigned for every election.
I disagreed with his policies 90% of the time. But he knew how to win elections. He was called the “happy warrior”for a reason.
We should take nothing for granted!
Hoover, Bush Sr. Carter. Four if you count Ford
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.