“Fox News has learned..”
Democrats have illegally leaked..
Isn’t it interesting the senate has no interest in investigating this in parallel with the house. But they ran russia investigation in parallel after 2016 election. And it’s been 3 years since the 2016 election, yet no info on fisa or the dossier from the alphabet agencies. Trump stands alone in DC, that is clear.
Marie Yovanovitch was covering for the Biden investment scheme to bilk money out of Ukraine. The Pay-for-play model was the get wealthy purpose of the Obama Regime. Money laundering was the method to hide what they stole.
Of course she does.
Of course she does.
Given that this was closed-door testimony, one would expect that any leaks would consist of the most damning bombshells. If this is the most newsworthy morsel that could be tossed to the press (and likely out of context), one would have to conclude her testimony was a complete lead balloon.
Hill likes Yavoniwitch....Let’s play the female card. How well do these girls know each other?
“Fox News has learned that Hill, who is testifying before the committee as part of the House’s impeachment inquiry into President Trump, had high praise for Yovanovitch during the closed-door session.”
But, Fox added, our source could have just made all that sh*t up!
Fox News: Leakers report, we decide.
Ukraine was trying to contact American officials about corruption by Americans. This Ambassador did everything she could to keep that from happening. I’d not be surprised if she got a piece of the 7 billion dollars that went down the RAT hole. She was an obstacle to Justice that got removed.
Hitlery Rotten Clinton told the deep state workers to “resist” the Trump Administration’s agenda and monkeywrench the government.
She deserves to be out of work.
When Obama fired Bush appointees no one batted an eyelash because Bushitler was a bad bad man. Shepherd Fairey, Obama’s personal propaganda poster artist, said so.
“...Rudy Giuliani, the onetime New York mayor is Trump’s personal attorney and has no official role in the U.S. government..”
I may be mistaken but was such a role required before he contacted officials in the Ukraine or was the President’s request enough? Because if the next line of the so called inquiry’s accusation is “no official role” it needs to be met and matched now.
So how did she morph into a “national security expert” for POTUS? Gateway Pundit reports she was not working at the White House when the Zelensky call was made, and it's hard to believe she ever worked there.
Of course, the Dems don't want her cross-examined by Republicans! More smoke and mirrors from Schiff.