Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Byron York: Democrats Use Secret Impeachment Process to Control Narrative
Breitbart ^ | 13 Oct 2019 | Joel B. Pollak

Posted on 10/13/2019 10:12:50 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Byron York wrote in the Washington Examiner on Saturday that Democrats are using a secret impeachment process to create a narrative that leaves out contradictory facts and prevents Republicans from presenting any real defense. York noted that Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee, chaired by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), are using the same tacit they used in 2017 to silence then-chair Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) with a phony ethics investigation. They are having witnesses testify in deposition, rather than in public or by transcription, which invokes ethics rules that prevent members from sharing any details publicly. Democrats then leak selective bits of testimony — and any Republicans who dare respond risk an ethics investigation that will silence them and damage them politically.

York observed:

Friday’s interview of Marie Yovanovitch, the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, marked a new point — a low point, as Republicans see it — in Democratic efforts to keep impeachment information out of public view.

The Yovanovitch session was different. Democrats conducted the interview in the format of a deposition, which is different from a transcribed interview. One key difference is that there are serious penalties for lawmakers who reveal the contents of a deposition. Doing so would almost surely subject the offending member to a House ethics investigation.

Here is the clever part, from the Democratic perspective. As the Yovanovitch interview began, her 10-page opening statement quickly leaked. In it, Yovanovitch made her case for all the press to read.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: byronyork; coup; couppeachment; democrats; fakeimpeachment; house; impeachment; schiffwhistleblower; trumpimpeachment

1 posted on 10/13/2019 10:12:50 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Nothing transparent about the Adam Schiff hearings. It is all behind closed doors so the public cannot watch the proceedings. That way the dimoKKKRATS can control the narrative.


2 posted on 10/13/2019 10:16:50 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

Star Chamber.


3 posted on 10/13/2019 10:17:53 AM PDT by Nothingburger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Unacceptable.


4 posted on 10/13/2019 10:19:28 AM PDT by bk1000 (I stand with Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Star chamber” courts were pretty much given a bad name long ago, as these institutions were used by royalty or other very powerful personages to intimidate challengers and subvert justice at every turn. Nobody can question the verdicts produced by these “star chambers”, because the proceedings and tactics used by the prosecution (usually in that absence of the defense altogether) never become public.

“The LAW is what I say it is, so shut up!”


5 posted on 10/13/2019 10:19:38 AM PDT by alloysteel (Nowhere in the Universe is there escape from the consequences of the crime of stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Democrats invoking Star Chamber proceedings.
Will the average American citizens allow this to continue?


6 posted on 10/13/2019 10:20:18 AM PDT by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It’s not an “impeachment”- it’s an “inquisition”.


7 posted on 10/13/2019 10:22:12 AM PDT by matthew fuller ( Trump's new immigration policy- Manifest Destiny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

the question is — how do republicans get around on the democrats


8 posted on 10/13/2019 10:22:21 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Schiff admits he should have been ‘much more clear’ about contact with whistleblower
Fox News ^ | 13 October 2019 | Andrew O’Reilly
Posted on 10/13/2019, 1:19:58 PM by E. Pluribus Unum

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., admitted on Sunday that he should have been clearer about his contact with the whistleblower who filed a complaint about President Trump’s July phone call with the Ukrainian president.

“I should have been much more clear,” Schiff said during an interview on CBS’ “Face The Nation.”

Fox News reported earlier this month that the intelligence community whistleblower did not disclose contact with Schiff’s staff to the intelligence committee inspector general (ICIG).

The sources said ICIG Michael Atkinson told lawmakers in a closed session that the whistleblower did not disclose the contact with the California Democrat’s committee and that Atkinson didn’t investigate that contact as he had no knowledge of it.

Sources also told Fox News that Atkinson also revealed that the whistleblower volunteered he or she was a registered Democrat and that they had a prior working relationship with a prominent Democratic politician.

Schiff’s office acknowledged earlier this month that the whistleblower had reached out to them before filing a complaint in mid-August, giving Democrats advance warning of the accusations that would lead them to launch an impeachment inquiry days later.

The source said Atkinson told lawmakers he did not know how a Schiff tweet in August and other statements about Ukraine appeared to reflect the substance of the whistleblower complaint, which was not declassified and not shared with Congress until the end of September.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


9 posted on 10/13/2019 10:29:19 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

The demon cat Losers have controlled the media forever- 50 years

however they do not own all the media anymore because now we have the Internet

Furthermore since the advent of Rush Limbaugh 1989 we have talk radio

So when shifty shift gets up there and does his nonsense and they think that that’s all the news that’s going to get out there they’re dead wrong


10 posted on 10/13/2019 10:36:38 AM PDT by Truthoverpower (The guvmint you get is the Trump winning express !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Doc91678
Will the average American citizens allow this to continue?

Depends on the definition of "average".

Author Bryon York states the process is a "...a low point, as Republicans see it".

Talk about a suggestive, obvious understatement!

He leaves out unregistered voters, independents, and Dems not wholly committed to their parties' totalitarian agenda.

He easily could have more accurately stated "...as the vast majority of American citizens see it"; one wonders why he chose not to.

11 posted on 10/13/2019 10:52:55 AM PDT by frog in a pot (Arguing the Founders intended the weakest of 2 possible forms of NBC for our leader is a scam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Isn’t it interesting that when the facts are against the Democrats that the Republicans refuse to charge anybody with anything. On the other hand, the Democrats create a narrative and immediately their minions in the administrative state set to charging the small fry within the Republican ranks in order to cement their narrative (read: conspiracy theory) into the publics’ mind.

We’re long since past the time where the Trump administration needs to start charging, trying and jailing the numerous Democrat offenses for leaking classified information, selling influence & perjury. Only then will the Democrat coup begin to unravel.


12 posted on 10/13/2019 10:53:05 AM PDT by Tallguy (Facts be d@mned! The narrative must be protected at all costs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Commies love their show trials.


13 posted on 10/13/2019 10:59:41 AM PDT by Kickaha (See the glory...of the royal scam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’m Shocked, Shocked that the dems play dirty.


14 posted on 10/13/2019 11:00:47 AM PDT by fatman6502002 ((The Team The Team The Team - Bo Schembechler circa 1969))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Where’s a whistle blower when you need one? If anybody is engaging in unethical behavior it’s Adam Schiff and his demonicRAT accomplices.


15 posted on 10/13/2019 11:46:34 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Can you imagine the hissyfit Adam Schiff would throw if some whistle blower divulged what is being said and done in those secret meetings?


16 posted on 10/13/2019 11:48:36 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson