Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jarrett: 'If Democrats were serious about impeachment Pelosi would dump Adam Schiff'
Fox News ^ | October 7, 2019 | Matt London

Posted on 10/07/2019 3:49:05 PM PDT by jazusamo

On Fox Nation’s “Deep Dive,” Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett warned that Democrats are pursuing an impeachment process that the authors of the U.S. Constitution would have opposed. As evidence, Jarrett pointed to the man that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi D-Calif., has empowered to lead the inquiry.

“Nancy Pelosi knows this,” said Jarrett. “In January of this year, she said we cannot impeach for political reasons and now she is doing precisely that. And the person that she has handled the gavel to, Adam Schiff, has a long and distinguished record of not just hatred of President Trump but lies and deceptions and false claims.”

“This is exactly what the framers feared: that an opposing party would seek to remove a president under impeachment for purely, political, partisan reasons or personal animus,” Jarrett argued.

On Friday, The Washington Post awarded House Intelligence Committee Chairman Schiff “Four Pinocchios” for misleading the media over his advanced knowledge of a whistleblower’s concerns regarding the now-infamous phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Jarrett said he listed a litany of instances raising concerns over Schiff’s integrity in his new book, “Witch Hunt: The Story of the Greatest Mass Delusion in American Political History.”

“[Schiff] pretended he had information he never had, he lied about Carter Page, he lied about the dossier, he lied about saying he had evidence of collusion with President Trump and Russia… He is absolutely the worst person to be presiding over this and if Democrats were serious about impeachment Pelosi would dump Adam Schiff,” he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: Delaware
KEYWORDS: adamschiff; botox; california; clowncar; declassification; delaware; democrats; districtofcolumbia; fbi; fisa; greggjarrett; impeachment; jamescomey; jeffbezos; joebiden; joeclowncarbiden; liarschiff; lisapage; nancypelosi; pelosi; peterstrzok; presidenttrump; robertmueller; sanfrancisco; sanfrannan; scaredschiffless; schiffforbrains; trump; washingtoncompost; washingtonpost; witchhunt

1 posted on 10/07/2019 3:49:05 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Pelosi: So Schiff is crooked,obnoxious,a liar, someone who conspires with witnesses to shape false testimony to build a case against an innocent victim-——what’s not to like?

He hates Trump and that counts for a lot.

Plus, well, he’s kinda cute isn’t he? Love that pencil neck and those bulging AOC eyes. On him it looks good.


2 posted on 10/07/2019 3:54:31 PM PDT by frank ballenger (End vote fraud & harvesting,non-citizen voting & leftist media news censorship or we are finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The founders envisioned impeachment for anything the House could muster a majority for, and the Senate could muster 67 votes for removal.

It was designed as a political remedy for the country to remove a President, his officers and Judges.

Under-utilized IMHO.

And designed to be abused by those willing to suffer the penalty of the people.

The Founders were not ignorant of the folly of man.

That’s why Representatives stand for election every two years. To keep them in synch with the will of the people, and when they lose synch to quickly remove them.

I still say Democrats do not have the votes, or don’t WANT to have the votes to pass articles of impeachment.


3 posted on 10/07/2019 4:06:27 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I’m with you on the Dems not wanting a vote on this before next years election and they may not have the votes for the inquiry.

They’re happy to keep slinging mud and have the three committees tied up with this fiasco.


4 posted on 10/07/2019 4:15:50 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

true about Schifty but only as a first step.. the D’s have a whole lot more swamp-draining to do ... including Pelousi


5 posted on 10/07/2019 4:21:49 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ( “Politicians are not , born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

MAGA!

Support Free Republic Folks, Donate Today!

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

6 posted on 10/07/2019 4:37:38 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

The way this procedure - extra-judicial but with judicial effect - is being conducted violates everything in the Constitution relating to judicial certainty, due process, a right to a defense, etc.

That said, I think it’s backfiring on them in a big way. For one thing, it’s called attention to Biden’s misdeeds and also to Obama’s continuing involvement in disruption.

So I think Trump is absolutely right to just go back to concentrating on governing - for example, getting us out of at least one part of the ME quagmire, working on the replacement for NAFTA, etc.

If he files suit at some point, I can’t believe any of Pelosi’s maneuvers to make herself President would be found even remotely constitutional. Also, I think he has an ace up his sleeve and probably knows something that is going to make the Dems wish they’d never even heard the name Nancy Pelosi.


7 posted on 10/07/2019 4:39:01 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It seems Pelosi WANTS Schiff to remain where he is. That she DOESN’T want a vote towards Impeachment or even a legitimate inquiry. This madness seems to be working for them better than any other thing they’ve tried. All they want to do is orchestrate the media to turn up the heat and confusion enough in the eyes of the people to make them think twice about voting for Trump. It’s all they have now, to keep these hit and run tactics in motion. It gives them cover for their own failures and inaction, helps them to cloke and spin the sins of their allies into nothing more than ‘conspiracy theories’. It’s too bad there aren’t any adults in the room who can nip these tantrums in the bud. Someone who can spank these babies raw to make them stop their incessant whining. There has to be some simple, brilliant idea that no one has thought of yet, but is right in front of us.


8 posted on 10/07/2019 4:39:39 PM PDT by Rainwave ("Work out your OWN salvation with fear and trembling")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Pelosi ain’t no dummie.

She put Shifty at point so that when it blows up, she has a sacrificial goat to throw to her base.

“Schiff messed it all up. I really wanted it to work, but Schiff....


9 posted on 10/07/2019 4:55:21 PM PDT by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Shifty is Pelosi's cut-out, her safety fuse.

When it blows up, she blames him, the base forgives her.


10 posted on 10/07/2019 4:58:46 PM PDT by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

I have a hunch you’re right and think she’d enjoy seeing him shafted.


11 posted on 10/07/2019 5:00:04 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity; All

the D’s have a whole lot more swamp-draining to do ... including Pelousi . FHC Is this what you’re talking about ?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3783714/posts


12 posted on 10/07/2019 5:33:45 PM PDT by mosesdapoet (mosesdapoet aka L,J,Keslin posting fobills are nr the record hoping some might read and pass around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

It should be 2/3rds for the house too.


13 posted on 10/07/2019 7:21:26 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Don’t worry, there will be 80 fewer Democrats in the house Jan 2021


14 posted on 10/07/2019 7:29:14 PM PDT by Rodm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rodm

Love it!


15 posted on 10/08/2019 5:20:49 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson