FULL HEADLINE: "Tulsi Gabbard says U.S. should re-enter Iran nuclear deal, end sanctions in response to Saudi Arabia drone attack"
1 posted on
09/19/2019 10:38:11 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: BenLurkin
She’s falling out of the spotlight so controversy garners attention. So sad.
To: BenLurkin
3 posted on
09/19/2019 10:43:31 PM PDT by
eclectic
(Liberalism is a mental disorder)
To: BenLurkin
4 posted on
09/19/2019 10:44:02 PM PDT by
o-n-money
To: BenLurkin
Gabbard is a moron, Iran is going to keep working on getting nukes, deal or not. They never stopped.
5 posted on
09/19/2019 10:44:02 PM PDT by
Beagle8U
(It's not whether you win or lose, it's how you place the blame.)
To: BenLurkin
Well, Tulsi, you just proved that cute only goes so far. Now close your poi hole and go back to what you were normally doing.
To: BenLurkin
Reward them!?
The response should be to destroy their Navy and other offensive military capabilities. All from the air.
To: BenLurkin
She has walked under that sign that says “Abandon hope all ye who enter here”. I really thought that she might come around, but I was wrong.
10 posted on
09/19/2019 10:49:36 PM PDT by
matthew fuller
( Trump's new immigration policy- Manifest Destiny!)
To: BenLurkin
[ Tulsi Gabbard says U.S. should re-enter Iran nuclear deal, end sanctions in response... ]
THIS is Barack Obama in a skirt. Well, ya know.....
11 posted on
09/19/2019 10:52:30 PM PDT by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: BenLurkin
Gabbard was the only Democrat 2020 hopeful, that we might have had hope for. That is now gone, and Gabbard has joined Valierie Jarrette in league with the appeasers of the Mullahs of Iran for that genocidal terrorist regime’s drive to nuclear war.
16 posted on
09/19/2019 11:10:36 PM PDT by
Richard Axtell
(I am at a loss, how much lower will they go before all hell breaks loose?)
To: BenLurkin
Tulsi doesn’t have enough brain weight to be a president.
18 posted on
09/20/2019 12:58:42 AM PDT by
familyop
("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
To: BenLurkin
20 posted on
09/20/2019 1:00:50 AM PDT by
greedo
To: BenLurkin
Libs are soooo stupid. We’ve been through this exact scenario countless times with N. Korea under Clinton and then again under Obama. Every time a Kim wanted to collect some goodies, they just fired off a rocket or something. Worked every time. They got a payoff and all we got in exchange was more rockets going off.
Proper response to Iran’s aggression: Double sanctions. Increase pressure on allies to do likewise. Sell defensive weapon systems to likely Iranian targets.
22 posted on
09/20/2019 1:44:22 AM PDT by
KyCats
To: BenLurkin
IOW the woman claiming to have so much knowledge wants to surrender
23 posted on
09/20/2019 2:03:08 AM PDT by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the cloudsi)
To: BenLurkin
I wonder how much money Iran paid her to say that.
27 posted on
09/20/2019 2:22:42 AM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: BenLurkin
Her response is complete and total surrender to Iran?
28 posted on
09/20/2019 2:46:17 AM PDT by
KobraKai
To: BenLurkin
Same argument was used by Japanesophiles .
To: BenLurkin
"Tulsi Gabbard says U.S. should re-enter Iran nuclear deal, end sanctions in response to Saudi Arabia drone attack" She was at least "interesting" to watch up to this statement meaning she said enough to put the DemoKKKrats on edge once in awhile. As for now:
Bye bye Tulsi.
33 posted on
09/20/2019 3:16:27 AM PDT by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: BenLurkin
She has gone full retard. Never go full retard.
34 posted on
09/20/2019 3:35:02 AM PDT by
DAC21
To: BenLurkin
"What I would do is, I would re-enter the Iran nuclear deal to prevent Iran from continuing to move forward in building a nuclear weapon that puts us and the world further at risk," Gabbard said After all, history tells us how well that strategy worked with North Korea. If you truly want to keep an unstable rogue nation from developing weapons of mass destruction, you *don't* give them money and resources to develop those weapons just because they promise (wink, wink) not to. It is unconscionable that we have botched diplomacy to the point where belligerent nations threaten us because they expect generous payouts in return.
35 posted on
09/20/2019 3:38:55 AM PDT by
exDemMom
(Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
To: BenLurkin
Her FNC anchor fanboy Tucker Carlson agrees with this idiocy as well.
38 posted on
09/20/2019 3:51:43 AM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson