Beto O'Rourke hits Pete Buttigieg with expletive-fueled swipe over gun-control comments

Fox News ^ | Sept. 16, 2019 | Talia Kaplan

[wastoute]

They are insane. They would require me to get a background check before giving my grandson a .22 rifle for his birthday. What the hell kind of background check could be done for a ten year old? So would the fact none could be done mean he can’t have it?

[mywholebodyisaweapon]

Bito O’Dork is about as macho as Freddie Mercury. At least Mercury was above-board in his role as a Prima Donna.

[Tench_Coxe]

They just want the fact that your 10 year old grandson has a .22 rifle in that database the government claims not to have.
That way, when your 10 year old's .22 gets re-classified as a "sniper rifle", they know exactly where to send the goons to go kick down the door and take it.

[Bonemaker]

“I’m not pro-gun but I support and understand the need for the Second Amendment.”

I don’t think you can be both.

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

Correct! It’s like a guitar string!

[MeneMeneTekelUpharsin]

Is this the new popularity test, who can swear the most profusely?

[MIchaelTArchangel]

Beet-Hole and Buttiplugieg are both evil fish-turds where the fish is the big mouthed bass.

[Old Yeller]

Tex Kennedy rear ends Peter eater.

[JimRed]

“Hell yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47, and we’re not going to allow it to be used against your fellow Americans anymore.”

Your coming to take it is the reason we HAVE a second amendment! You are no longer a fellow American; you are a domestic enemy. Make my day!

[BBQToadRibs]

“Beto seems to think that using profanity is helping his image. Beto is dumb.”

Even over at DU they criticize his swearing.

[savedbygrace]

We cuss in order to feel like we’re in control of a situation.

[precisionshootist]

"“I’m not pro-gun but I support and understand the need for the Second Amendment.” I don’t think you can be both."

I think the poster meant he does not like guns personally but is ok with others having them and understands why we have a second amendment. Not a thing wrong with that position.

[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

He knows he has no shot, but his goal is to be needed for an endorsement, in say, Texas? So he is simply going to the bottom of the barrel to get the skater, bong-hitting, Austin-ite type voters locked in for leverage.

[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

He and Abortion Barbie are going to do a statewide tour of how to suck at elections in Texas.

[skimbell]

"...these are wounds of war — that high-impact, high-velocity round, when it hit their systems, just shredded everything inside of them,” O’Rourke said..."

Oh shi+! Here we go again with the spinning bullet AR super killer rifle.

These clowns ought to visit a deer check station this fall and check out the damage a little bigger "weapon of war" makes.

[gundog]

I think he’d have to be 18 to clear an FFL. That said, it’s as much about identifying a specific firearm, and who has it, as anything else.

[grania]

re: not being pro-gun but support the Second Amendment. Of course it’s possible. I don’t want any US citizens to lose rights granted to them by the Constitution and its Amendments, even if they aren’t my personal priorities.

[caseinpoint]

Agreed. O’Rourke and Buttiegeg are both playing up “transgressive” characteristics to appeal to voters. What I believe they don’t understand is that “transgressive” characteristics are what voters decide to overlook if they are outweighed by other important factors like real accomplishments.

[Beagle8U]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDpDhofRoXA

This is more like the demonrat debates.

[Army Air Corps]

I am reminded of the old Celebrity Deathmatch show...