Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT updates Kavanaugh 'bombshell' to note accuser doesn't recall alleged assault
Fox News ^ | Sept. 16, 2019 | Greg Re

Posted on 09/16/2019 6:19:48 AM PDT by libstripper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: nuconvert
"NYT new motto :

“Throw it against the wall & see if it sticks”"

Eventually....it will stick, for 2 primary reasons.

(R)'s generally don't fight back and secondly, the numbers of ignorant people in this country increases daily.

21 posted on 09/16/2019 7:00:19 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
The "revision" appeared suddenly after Mollie Hemingway worked the Times over in a thread on Twitter.

So I’m reading the new anti-Kavanaugh book by shockingly (really) biased reporters at NYT. All claimed anonymous sources are anti-Kavanaugh while all but a tiny few on-record sources are downright effusive. Just interesting how highly they contradict each other.— Mollie (@MZHemingway) September 15, 2019


22 posted on 09/16/2019 7:03:05 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind

23 posted on 09/16/2019 7:06:44 AM PDT by Tommy Revolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

The civil legal system and judges are partly to blame, When was the last time a liable or slander suit awarded against these media liars.


24 posted on 09/16/2019 7:08:24 AM PDT by Openurmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OttawaFreeper

What drives me crazy about this kind of stuff is, yea sure sue for liable and defamation and spend a year trying to get the system to even hear your case, but the definition of the truth in the court of public opinion is the first story that hits the street everything after that is a rebuttal.

So let’s smear this guy’s character some more cuz we can and we can create the image of evil white guy conservative.


25 posted on 09/16/2019 7:10:50 AM PDT by Jimmy The Snake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

“The hate filled Left really needs to stop this libel.”

Why would they? There are no consequences.


26 posted on 09/16/2019 7:15:55 AM PDT by bk1000 (I stand with Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bk1000
“The hate filled Left really needs to stop this libel.” Why would they? There are no consequences.

Yep, inaction on multiple crimes by the DOJ perpetuates this crap.

27 posted on 09/16/2019 7:17:35 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

BELIEVE ALL WOMEN!!

UNLESS THEY DENY THE ALLEGATIONS!


28 posted on 09/16/2019 7:18:20 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Eventually....it will stick, for 2 primary reasons.

This is not about making anything stick. This is about (1) trying to intimidate PDJT into nominating someone the Dems approve of when Ruth Buzzie finally passes, and (ii) trying to intimidate conservatives into rejecting a nomination for the seat.

One can only hope that PDJT has gotten the message that you can't work with these bastards, you can only fight them with everything you've got.

29 posted on 09/16/2019 7:20:50 AM PDT by KevinB ("Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." - Charles Darwin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

This might cover the Times’ behind legally, but it won’t slow down the Dems’ smear campaign or calls for Kavanaugh’s impeachment.


30 posted on 09/16/2019 7:30:56 AM PDT by Salman (The Democrat agenda in one word -- revenge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper; null and void; aragorn; azishot; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; Beautiful_Gracious_Skies; ...
.

PING

31 posted on 09/16/2019 7:31:17 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

The NYT sure has to shift into reverse a lot these days. Maybe they should vet stories before they go to print.


32 posted on 09/16/2019 7:40:36 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind

“MSNBC is pumping it out as him being guilty right now.”

So is ABC.


33 posted on 09/16/2019 7:58:43 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
...several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault in question at all...

Gee, if we had a real FBI, a real DOJ rather than the entities that were polluted and for all intents and purposes destroyed by 8 years of bammy...

If we had real law and justice in this Country someone would look into the "alleged victim" and find out who prompted her to come up with this obviously false accusation. There's a money trail in there somewhere. The "alleged victim" should be prosecuted and serve time, as should everyone connected with the false attack - all the way back up to the original money source. A few years 3 hots and a cot would be a great lesson to them, and an even better message to any others who might want to try something similar.

34 posted on 09/16/2019 8:04:37 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps ( Be ready!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

>>>The Slimes does it again. FAKE NEWS!!! And ALL THE DEMONSHIT CANDIDATES RAN WITH IT.<<<

Sick of ALL of those people. They were born in the sewer, live in the sewer, and spew nothing but sewage from their filthy mouths. Choke on it, all you @$$holes.


35 posted on 09/16/2019 8:05:31 AM PDT by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conserv

“.... and here I thought the media couldn’t possibly beclown themselves any further.”

Unfortunately, this is only the tip of the iceberg.


36 posted on 09/16/2019 8:09:34 AM PDT by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

“and has made no comment about the episode.”

Not much of a retraction..........”about the episode” WHAT EPISODE? Still wanting to promote the idea there was an “episode”


37 posted on 09/16/2019 8:09:35 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
The Times headline is still:

"Calls for Kavanaugh’s Impeachment Come Amid New Misconduct Allegations"

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/15/us/brett-kavanaugh-allegations-trump-impeach.html
38 posted on 09/16/2019 8:12:54 AM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps
If we had real law and justice in this Country someone would look into the "alleged victim" and find out who prompted her to come up with this obviously false accusation.

I guess you didn't read the article. The "alleged victim" did not come forward and, according to friends, has no recollection of it. NYT is the perp here.

39 posted on 09/16/2019 8:30:21 AM PDT by KevinB ("Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." - Charles Darwin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: KevinB
I realize the NYT is now a full-on propaganda machine for the left, with no ethics, no journalistic integrity... But do you really believe they just pulled this lady's name out of a virtual hat and wrote her into their original drivel? I'll bet she was contacted, and was initially on-board with taking another run at Kavanaugh, and then got cold feet and is now throwing NYT under the bus. Maybe her lawyer explained libel law and counter-suits to her.

Not that getting publicly discgraced is a problem for the NYT, they're a sewer rag now anyway but. I believe she was in on it, in spite of her story now. The NYT wouldn't have pressed forward with this trash that could be so easily torpedoed. This had to have been a surprise to them too.

40 posted on 09/16/2019 8:43:35 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps ( Be ready!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson