Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Omar, Tlaib welcome decision ruling US terror watchlist unconstitutional
JERUSALEM POST ^ | 9-6-19

Posted on 09/06/2019 2:44:35 PM PDT by SJackson

A federal judge ruled that the inclusion in the list infringes upon the right to due process.

Jerusalem Postb American Politicsb

Omar, Tlaib welcome decision ruling US terror watchlist unconstitutional

A federal judge ruled that the inclusion in the list infringes upon the right to due process.

By JERUSALEM POST STAFF

/ September 6, 2019 10:08 x 1 minute read.

 

U.S. Rep Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and U.S. Rep Ilhan Omar (D-MN)

U.S. Rep Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and U.S. Rep Ilhan Omar (D-MN). (photo credit: REUTERS/ERIN SCOTT)

US Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib has expressed her appreciation after a US federal judge ruled that an FBI terror watchlist was unconstitutional.

"I have heard of horrifying stories of Muslim Americans who were placed on the so-called 'watch list,' with no pathway (you know, due process!) to getting their names removed. Today, it's Muslims, but tomorrow it can be you, if we don't stop this madness," Tlaib, a Muslim-American of Palestinian descent, tweeted on Thursday.

Also US Representative Ilhan Omar, who arrived in the US as a refugee from Somalia as a child, called the decision "tremendous."

"Congratulations to everyone who worked so hard to make sure Constitutional rights are extended to all regardless of religion, race or ethnicity!" she added on Twitter.

Judge Anthony J. Trenga of the Eastern District of Virginia ruled in favor of 23 Muslim Americans who were included in the list, the Washington Post reported.

They had sued the FBI on the ground that the inclusion infringed upon their constitutional right to due process.

Those included on the list have restrictions placed on their ability to travel, among others.

"There is no evidence, or contention, that any of these plaintiffs satisfy the definition of a 'known terrorist,'" wrote Trenga, according to the Washington Post.

"An individual's placement into the [watch list] does not require any evidence that the person engaged in criminal activity, committed a crime, or will commit a crime in the future," the judge added, "and individuals who have been acquitted of a terrorism-related crime may still be listed."

The list included about 1.2 million people, including 4,600 US citizens or residents as of July 2017.

According to the Associated Press, the FBI's lawyers claimed in court that the challenges alleged by the plaintiffs were overshadowed by the government's needs in their fight against terror - and that these efforts outweighed the difficulties alleged by the nearly two dozen Muslim American citizens on the list.

Several of them reported a range of traumatic experiences, such as being handcuffed and interrogated for many hours, without possible cause.

The Washington Post reported that the parties now have 45 days to submit their arguments and responses for how the watch list could be changed.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts; US: Michigan; US: Minnesota; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ayannapressley; bds; berniesanders; commiejudges; ilhanomar; islam; jihad; jihadsquad; joecrowley; judiciary; justicedemocrats; massachusetts; michigan; minnesota; muslims; newyork; ocasiocortez; omar; rashidatlaib; saikatchakrabarti; smirkingchimpjudge; subhaschandrabose; svengali; taqiyya; tlaib
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 09/06/2019 2:44:35 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

I feel safer already.

Related

Rashida Tlaib once complained sister was on no-fly list – now that she’s in Congress, details on status are scarce

2 posted on 09/06/2019 2:46:06 PM PDT by SJackson (blow in a dogÂ’s face, he gets mad at you, car ride; he sticks his head out the window)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Should have noted, it probably does violate due process. As pertains to the 4,500. The rest, we can keep whoever we want out of our nation. We bar lots of people. Including, Democrat hyperventilation aside, a member of the Knesset


3 posted on 09/06/2019 2:47:43 PM PDT by SJackson (blow in a dogÂ’s face, he gets mad at you, car ride; he sticks his head out the window)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

So she will join us in opposing Red Flag laws, RIGHT?


4 posted on 09/06/2019 2:48:56 PM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Tlaib’s sister has been on a no-fly list for 7 years.
Lovely family


5 posted on 09/06/2019 2:49:24 PM PDT by silverleaf (Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Chan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Right...

But, taking guns away from a suspected “domestic” terrorist does not require due process?


6 posted on 09/06/2019 2:50:54 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Don’t need one since we know muzzies.


7 posted on 09/06/2019 2:51:08 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

Great point.


8 posted on 09/06/2019 2:52:30 PM PDT by gattaca ("Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
A federal judge ruled that the inclusion in the list infringes upon the right to due process.

It pains me to agree with any member of "The Squad" on anything but on this matter, they're sadly correct.

I'm actually surprised it's taken this long to notice the obvious.

9 posted on 09/06/2019 2:54:09 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
TERROR WATCH LIST WITH NO DUE PROCESS RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL affecting mostly Muslims living the U.S.

RED FLAG LAWS WITH NO DUE PROCESS affecting mostly HONKIES living in the U.S.? Makes Omar & Tlaib SMILE!!!

10 posted on 09/06/2019 2:57:23 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

Yep. red flag laws, same thing. Family would be the worst offenders for making false charges.

ps.

I’m the crazy uncle at Thanksgiving libs always reference.


11 posted on 09/06/2019 2:58:43 PM PDT by DeplorablePaul (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

What was Judge Anthony J. Trenga’s justification for saying the terror watchlist was unconstitutional? I hope this goes to the Supreme Court.


12 posted on 09/06/2019 3:01:44 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

waiting for redflag laws to be considered uncomstitutional for lack of due process.


13 posted on 09/06/2019 3:11:15 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maxwellsmart_agent

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Trenga

This judge upheld the Muslim travel exclusion, so I think he’s not being a knee jerk liberal.


14 posted on 09/06/2019 3:12:40 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

“...a US federal judge ruled that an FBI terror watchlist was unconstitutional.”

Considering that some weenies in the gestapo FBI name veterans as potential “terrorists,” this is a good ruling.


15 posted on 09/06/2019 3:35:15 PM PDT by sergeantdave (Teach a man to fish and he'll steal your gear and sell it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Except they are not looking for Due Process....They are looking for "privilege".

It's not like the entire US population is on the list. And there IS some reason you got on the list. It could be an error....but it's our perogative to create a list.

The USSR will sort it out.

16 posted on 09/06/2019 3:36:16 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

The no fly list was unconstitutional and illegal to begin with. Just like the DHS.


17 posted on 09/06/2019 3:37:26 PM PDT by one4perl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Whoops.....USSR should be USSC. Mind is overworked.


18 posted on 09/06/2019 3:39:43 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: maxwellsmart_agent
What was Judge Anthony J. Trenga’s justification for saying the terror watchlist was unconstitutional?

It's all right there in the article:

No due process.

I hope this goes to the Supreme Court.

Where hopefully a stake will be driven through its heart.

19 posted on 09/06/2019 3:42:32 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

...Islam is a political system bent on global domination. The religion is merely a beard.

The hells angels are more of a religion on a relative basis.


20 posted on 09/06/2019 3:44:59 PM PDT by himno hero (had'nff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson