Dean Baquet
The NYT should be burned to the ground as a domestic enemy of the People of The United States.
Dean Baquet
Virtue signaling to suicide. It’s just a shot away. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbmS3tQJ7Os
And never before has so little of the country cared what the NYT thinks. The media is starting to have negative influence - I’m enjoying watching them spin there wheels ever faster but nothing is gain traction. They’ve tried every trick in their book and president Trump is as popular as ever. Next comes self doubt for these losers that should be fun.
It's payback time...
https://www.amazon.com/Stalins-Apologist-Walter-Duranty-Timess/dp/0195057007
It’s time to drive a stake through the black heart of this media monster. We need to shut it down for good.
Don’t leave out the Washington Post for starters.
How did the transcript leak? That might be a more interesting question.
America isn’t nearly as divided as the leftists make out. What division that does exist is there virtually 100% due to their (the leftists) actions and efforts.
The myth of an unbiased news media is the corner stone of propaganda.
“Never before has a single media institution played such a destructive role in the nation’s life.”
Well, CBS’ Walter Cronkite singlehandedly caused the Vietnam Nam war to not be won at Tet, by lying to America about it. And the folks at home swallowed his lies, trusted him. After retirement from TV, Cronkite shed his fake ‘regular guy’ skin and went full left in print.
NYT has been leftist a long time. A recent thread here discussed its role in supporting Fidel Castro’s ‘revolution’ in Cuba (directed/funded by the communist USSR).
That same media institution was - during wartime - publicly and openly overestimating enemy troop strength and revealing information about our equipment in...
...early 1862. The NYT has long been demonstrably incorrigible. Their destructive role goes back at least 157 years, but I might agree that they are now more openly against the United States of America - as established - than ever before.
Standards, ethics, objectivity and professionalism are dead at the NYT, but sadly the paper will continue on. It’s online subscriptions increased by something like 2 million after Trump’s election - and all those psycho subscribers want the hyper-partisanship and undiluted b.s. that the rag produces daily. Obvious and over-the-top propaganda is the NYT’s new business model (along with the rest of the legacy media).
Power corrupts. Reporters are no different than politicians. It’s astonishing how our founders recognized this human frailty and how modern “thinkers” fail to grasp it.
The New York Times is and always has been biased towards the left. The only thing that has changed is they are more open about their bias and their willingness to do anything to prevent President Trump from being re-elected.
So?
People who buy (and read) the New York Times are already convinced that President Trump should not be re-elected and will not vote for him. Again, So?
The only thing that the New York Times has accomplished is to be sure anyone that is not already a Anti-Trumper will not read nor respect anything printed in the Times. Their negative stories will not convince any current Trump supporter to switch side since for the most part those that support President Trump will never see an article printed in the the Times
Technology will be what kills the New York Times, not their bias.
He detailed his teaching philosophy, explained a couple of concepts of teaching language and correctly answered all questions on classroom control/discipline. At the end of the interview, the superintendent stated that he had an awesome concept of teaching and had demonstrated an understanding of everything needed and then pointed to his notebook and explained that he had marked down every time the man had said "black" and "Mexican" in the interview, three times "black" and six times "Mexican". My friend was stunned.
He is married to a native of Mexico and has been for over 30 years. His son dated an "African-American" woman at one time of which he approved. And yet, here is this man telling him he used the wrong terms in referring to people. The superintendent told him that if he used those terms in the classroom, he would cause a major issue and that the school would get calls demanding the teacher be fired.
He went on to point out as this was discussed that the friend used the term "black" when referring to the superintendent yet again. He asked my friend why he used that term again. The friend answered, "Because that's what you are." Another individual in the interview group also told my friend that there were teachers there who were "African-American" and if he called them black "they would fight you." The friend was not going to take the job (on wife's advice), but was called the next day and told he would not be offered the position.
This true story really needs to hit some major media outlet, but we don't know how to get it out. If a journalist is truly interested, (s)he can PM me on this forum.
My swan song as chapter leader was the 2006 demonstration against the Times for revealing the information that caused ISIS to go off the grid in their internal financial communications.
Yet I kept buying the paper until this year, when I found their new explicitness in sexual subjects to be totally objectionable.
I still pull the crossword puzzle out of the recycling bin but don’t bother reading anything else of their biased fury. The Trump Derangement had reached even the restaurant reviews.
The Grey Lady has for some time now been The Old Gray Whore, a bodello for presstitutes
bias equals layoffs... Dr. Raoul