Posted on 08/19/2019 9:34:29 AM PDT by DeweyCA
Perhaps when you think of the founding of the United States, you think of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Federalist Papers. Now, the New York Times wants to "reframe" your understanding of the nation's founding.
In the Times' view (which it hopes to make the view of millions of Americans), the country was actually founded in 1619, when the first Africans were brought to North America, to Virginia, to be sold as slaves.
This year marks the 400th anniversary of that event, and the Times has created something called the 1619 Project. This is what the paper hopes the project will accomplish: "It aims to reframe the country's history, understanding 1619 as our true founding, and placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of the story we tell ourselves about who we are."
Another, more concise statement from the Times: "The goal of The 1619 Project is to reframe American history."
The basic thrust of the 1619 Project is that everything in American history is explained by slavery and race. The message is woven throughout the first publication of the project, an entire edition of the Times magazine. It begins with an overview of race in America — "Our democracy's founding ideals were false when they were written. Black Americans have fought to make them true." — written by Times writer Nikole Hannah-Jones, who on Twitter uses the identity Ida Bae Wells, from the crusading late 19th-early 20th century African American journalist Ida B. Wells.
The essays go on to cover the economy ("If you want to understand the brutality of American capitalism, you have to start on the plantation."), the food we eat ("The sugar that saturates the American diet has a barbaric history as the 'white gold' that fueled slavery."), the nation's physical health ("Why doesn't the United States have universal healthcare? The answer begins with policies enacted after the Civil War."), politics ("America holds onto an undemocratic assumption from its founding: that some people deserve more power than others."), daily life ("What does a traffic jam in Atlanta have to do with segregation? Quite a lot."), and much more.
The Times promises more 1619 Project stories in the future, not just in the paper's news sections, but in the business, sports, travel, and other sections. The Times' popular podcast, The Daily, will also devote time to it.
But a project with the aim of reframing U.S. history has to be more than a bunch of articles and podcasts. A major goal of the 1619 Project is to take the reframing message to schools. The Times has joined an organization called the Pulitzer Center (which, it should be noted, is not the organization that hands out the Pulitzer Prize) to create a 1619 Project curriculum. "Here you will find reading guides, activities, and other resources to bring The 1619 Project into your classroom," the center says in a message to teachers.
The paper also wants to reach into schools itself. "We will be sending some of our writers on multi-city tours to talk to students," Hannah-Jones said recently, "and we will be sending copies of the magazine to high schools and colleges. Because to us, this project really takes wing when young people are able to read this and understand the way that slavery has shaped their country's history."
The project rollout just happened to come at the same time as the leak of a transcript of a Times employee town hall in which the paper's executive editor, Dean Baquet, discussed his "vision" of making race the central theme of Times coverage for the remaining two years of President Trump's term in office.
Baquet spoke frankly about the paper's approach to Trump. For two years, he explained, the Times made a very, very big deal of the Trump-Russia affair. "We built our newsroom to cover one story," Baquet said. But then came the Mueller report, which failed to establish the core allegation against the president: that he and his campaign conspired or coordinated with Russia to fix the 2016 election.
"Now we have to regroup," Baquet told the staff, "and shift resources and emphasis to take on a different story."
That different story is race — and Trump. "We've got to change," Baquet said. "I mean, the vision for coverage for the next two years is what I talked about earlier: How do we cover a guy who makes these kinds of remarks? How do we cover the world's reaction to him? How do we do that while continuing to cover his policies? How do we cover America, that's become so divided by Donald Trump?"
Some on the staff appeared both anguished by the president ("it's a very scary time") and more than ready to make race a key feature of Times coverage.
"I'm wondering to what extent you think that the fact of racism and white supremacy being sort of the foundation of this country should play into our reporting?" one staffer asked Baquet. "Just because it feels to me like it should be a starting point, you know? Like these conversations about what is racist, what isn't racist, I just feel like racism is in everything. It should be considered in our science reporting, in our culture reporting, in our national reporting."
The staffer's point brought Baquet back to the paper's new initiative. "One reason we all signed off on The 1619 Project and made it so ambitious and expansive was to teach our readers to think a little bit more like that," Baquet said. "Race in the next year ... is going to be a huge part of the American story. And I mean, race in terms of not only African Americans and their relationship with Donald Trump, but Latinos and immigration."
So the Times has two big plans. One would be big enough: to focus on the universe of racism accusations that increasingly surround the president at a time when he just happens to be running for reelection. But the other is even bigger: to "reframe" American history in accordance with the values of Times editors. It's an extraordinarily ambitious undertaking for people in what used to be known more simply as the news business.
“The goal of The 1619 Project is to reframe American history.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It doesn’t help when Bush League Republicans like Nikki Haley are assisting them.
The left has been “reframing” (i.e. distorting for political effect) American history for decades now. That’s why most young people don’t know even the basics of American history. Leftists love focusing on the worst 10% of it in order to use it as a bludgeon to try to bring down the country and its people.
Is there any Conservative with money to buy out the NYT or WP and fire these anti-American bums?
(yawn)….Howard Zinn already did this back in the 80’s. Were he still alive he’s sue the Times for copyright infringement.
Ping.
Well they’re right about slavery.
It’s the backbone of this country and once we abolish it I don’t think we will last 5 years...
Wait a minute...
Ping.
The goal of the left is to destroy this country as we know it. To start, they are trying to destroy our pride in our country. They hate this country, as shown by the kneeling “athletes” and the BLM crowd.
Remember Orwell: He who controls the past, controls the future; and he who controls the present, controls the past.
Looks like the theme of the democrats in 2020 will be “Trump racist” “USA racist.” They must be defeated.
These bastards hate the country this is no longer arguable. We have an FEC and they need to go after the NYT. This is a huge in kind campaign donation to the Rats.
The commies are freaking out over the #walkAways from the collectivist plantation.
Much of the spade work has already been done. It is already an article of faith (for the left) that the election of Obama was the very first time anyone could legitimately be proud of our country.
And it is generally well accepted that monuments to Big Devil Confederates should be destroyed. It will be a tiny step to get Democrats to agree to take down memorials to slave owners Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Jackson, and Americus Vespucci.
Columbus is gone. And don't think that known white supremacists like Grant and Lincoln will be safe. They will come for them too. The way it is shaping up, anyone that came before, or after, Obama is fair game.
“democrats in 2020 will be “Trump racist” “USA racist.”
1. Russians
2. Racist
3. Rapist (as election comes near)
They’ll never quit lying
I’ve always regretted that Africans were brought here.
Coward Brother Bush I hired the entire commission, and all members’ commissions have since expired, half more than 10 years ago, with two vacancies.
The Fraud’s handlers must have been satisfied with the members, too.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Election_Commission
Rush is talking about it now -(8/19/19, about 12:30 EST) - note, PDJT should preempt this. Jamestown Landing, 1619, had 20 slaves. William Bradford, Mayflower, 1621, no slaves.
The Times are so woke that they are asleep to the reality that they are stooges of the communists. The communist have taught them well — redefine history, overlook and avoid the obvious, keep the dream of Marxism and socialism alive at any cost and despite all it’s failures. The “woke” title is self congratulatory moniker to their colossal delusion and stupidity. And yet we persist with these termites eating away at the fabric of society.
The Russia hoax having failed as have all other attacks on Trump and America... they scream “racism” LOUDER! #1619 Project #Kamikaze
IMHO I don’t think the insane Leftnoids really think they’re going to win in 2020. I see them as accepting defeat... but with INSANE RAGE! So like Japan in the last year of World War II they’re in Kamikaze mode! Though in the face of defeat inflict as many casualties on the enemy as possible. As do modern suicide bombers. It’s a “strategy” based in the despair of inevitable defeat. The Leftnoids have hijacked the media and plan to fly it and their “racism” invectives into the towers of our Founding!
These arrogant bastards are amoral beyond belief.
In 1619 we were subjects of the British Empire in which slavery was universally practiced. Independence was 182 years in the future.
The New York Times is an enemy of America and the personal enemy of Pres. Trump and each & every one of us who voted for him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.