Posted on 07/25/2019 7:42:12 AM PDT by DFG
On MTP Daily Wednesday evening, Trump-deranged host Chuck Todd commiserated with fellow liberal MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell over Robert Mueller’s testimony before Congress. Mitchell sadly conceded that this whole Russia investigation was probably finally over, but she couldn’t help but take swings at “shameful” Republicans while expressing her disappointment.
Todd asked Mitchell if Wednesday’s events would lead to impeachment or was it finally the nail in the coffin for the Russia investigation: “Today was a moment. Is it a moment that leads to something bigger or is today going to be an epilogue on the Mueller Report?” he asked.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
WOW! You know they are delusional, but to hear it sometimes, is a bit shocking.
Go bring up that 2008 pic of Angryea Mitchell pushing a Newsweek cover at Sarah Palin.
Beauty confronted by sheer inner & outer ugliness.
“Keep digging!”
Pock face speaks.
Before Andrea was Mrs Greenspan she was known to be quite a free spirit with an appetite for just about anything that wore pants. Several pix of her posing nude were on the internet at one time ... probably scrubbed by now. Alan was likely a part of her extensive coterie and if he was well-off at the time, was probably the leading contender of those seeking Andrea’s ‘charms’.
The press with Trump in 2016:
The press with Hillary in 2016:
Grumpy with Sarah Palin:
It’s reeeeal sad for all of ‘em, in their echo chamber...lol
Andrea and Chuck and the whole democratic party, should be ashamed of themselves.
As WE ALL by now, the “Mueller” investigation was NOT conducted by Mueller.
Mueller was just the figurehead, and the people that conducted the investigations were not interviewed nor selected by him. In fact, what occurred would be analogous to having the mob bosses investigate the Mafia. IOW, the crooks who started the whole Russia collusion mess got to do the investigation.
All of that is evident by what they ‘investigated’ and what they skipped completely. No FusionGPS investigation, and no Steele investigation, and no dossier investigation. All of that was central to the investigation
What did occur was that the crooked investigators knew from the start that they could NOT EVEN MENTION the dossier nor Steele nor fusionGPS nor the DNC nor Hillary nor Obama. So, after dropping the reason for why they were hired, they knew that they had to come up with something to get Trump with. So, they set him up and his associates in traps for ‘lying to the FBI’ and investigators. That was easy to to, especially when just about everybody involved in politics has something to hide. So, the trap was to get the Trump associates in those traps, and then get them to give up the goods on the president.
The whole investigation was a hoax from the start, started by a hoax created by the Hillary campaign and the DNC and the Obama administration. The people selected to do the investigation were ALL associated with the DOJ/FBI/Hillary/Obama crooks who fabricated the phony dossier against Trump. Those crooks who produced the phony charges were slick, and jumped on the opportunity to bring in their own lawyers and investigators, in order to make sure that NOBODY on the democrat side got implicated nor investigated. There is nobody on the democrat side mentioned in the “Mueller” report, yet, they are the people that needed to be investigated and not Trump.
The “Mueller” report is misnamed, and should rightfully be named, “How the democrats were able to co-opt the collusion investigation and turn it into an obstruction investigation”. Mueller was “just there” in name only.
What the democrats have produced with the (not) “Mueller” report, is a second dossier against Trump, all of which is as flawed as the original Steele dossier.
When you allow the crooks to investigate themselves, they will always find themselves innocent and point the fingers elsewhere.
Another 30 pieces of silver person lacking the ability to be objective
Mueller and a bunch of democRats ran the investigation.
Tell me again Andrea, how Republicans could influence it?
Let me pose a riddle, a conundrum, if you will.
What is the difference between Beto and a Mallard with a cold?
“journalists” sadly crying that there is no there, there when it comes to ousting a POTUS!!! Anti-American scum.
I can’t guess
(bing doesn’t knoweither)
That is disrespectful to Rod Stewart. According to my memory all the girls I talked to in the 80’s (not many, mind you) Rod was extremely hot.
This hag is more muppet/fraggle-rock’ish.
“Andrea Mitchell: I’m ‘Sad’”
That just breaks my heart, I tell ya.
cat
Wait, Andrea Mitchell is not dead?
Joyless......ALL Democrats are JOYLESS!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.